Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for tongue space measurements in the field of orthodontics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 June 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Accurately measuring tongue space is challenging, but this information can be useful to many dental specialties. This study was intended to estimate the reliability of using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure tongue space, which includes tongue volume and the oral cavity air capacity.

Methods

For this preliminary study, CBCT images from ten participants (five females and five males, mean age of 29.8 ± 3.3 years) were available for evaluation. Each participant was radiographed two times (T0 and T1). The average time between T0 and T1 was 15.8 ± 3.7 days. CBCT scans were standardized to reduce variability. Three-dimensional landmarks were established to identify tongue space and 3D image analysis software (SimPlant® 17 Pro; Materialise Dental, Leuven, Belgium) was used to measure the volume circumscribed by the landmarks. Two investigators independently calculated airway, tongue dimensions, and total tongue space for CBCT image T0 twice (day 1 and day 14), and T1 once. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to estimate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Bland–Altman charts were constructed to demonstrate agreement within and between raters.

Results

The intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs of the CBCT measurements at T0 were excellent (> 0.90). Measurements for T0 vs. T1 show good (0.75–0.90) intra-rater and excellent (> 0.90) inter-rater reliability. Bland–Altman charts show that 90–95% of the total measurements fall within the 95% limits of agreement for both intra- and inter-rater pairs

Conclusions

The results of this preliminary study suggest that the landmarks chosen to measure the overall tongue space are reproducible and can be measured clearly using CBCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Kadhum MA. Assessment of tongue space are in a sample of Iraqi adults with Class I dental and skeletal pattern. J Bagh Coll Dentistry. 2015;27:117–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vig PS, Cohen AM. The size of the tongue and intermaxillary space. Angle Orthod. 1975;44:25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen AM, Vig PS. A serial growth study of the tongue and intermaxillary space. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:332–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardran GM, Kemp FH. A functional assessment of relative tongue size. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1972;114:282–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:367–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alpern M. Diagnosing functional tongue space. Orthod Prod 2011.

  8. Waese S. Concern about space for the tongue. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthod. 2011;140:756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takada K, Sakuda M, Yoshida K, Kawamura Y. Relations between tongue volume and capacity of the oral cavity proper. J Dent Res. 1980;59:2026–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uysal T, Yagci A, Ucar FU, Veli I, Ozer T. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of relationship between tongue volume and lower incisor irregularity. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35:555–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liegeois F, Albert A, Limme M. Comparison between tongue volume from magnetic resonance images and tongue are from profile cephalograms. Eur J Orthod. 2009;32:381–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauder R, Muhl Z. Estimation of tongue volume from magnetic resonance imaging. Angle Orthod. 1991;61:175–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tseng Y, Wu J, Chen C, Hsu K. Correlation between change of tongue area and skeletal stability after correction of mandibular prognathism. Kaoshiung J Med Sci. 2017;33:302–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ding X, Suzuki S, Shiga M, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Moriayama K. Evaluation of tongue volume and oral cavity capacity using cone-beam computed tomography. Odontology. 2018;106:266–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roehm E. Computed tomographic measurement of tongue volume relative to its surrounding space. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1982;81:172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenzoni D, Bolognese A, Daniela G, Fabio R, Sant’Anna E. Cone beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ludlow JB, Walker C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144:802–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Kakuno E, Kanomi R, et al. Tongue posture improvement and pharyngeal airway enlargement as secondary effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li HY, Chen NH, Wang CR, Shu YH, Wang PC. Use of 3-dimensional computed tomography scan to evaluate upper airway patency for patients undergoing sleep-disordered breathing surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:336–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cevidanes L, Oliveira AEF, Motta A, Phillips C, Burke B, Tyndall D. Head orientation in CBCT-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:971–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: CBCT vs. conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:312–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park JH, Kim S, Lee YJ, Bayome M, Kook YA, Hong M, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary dentoalveolar changes and airway space after distalization in adults. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:187–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Y, Hong L, Wang CL, Zhang SJ, Cao C, Wei F, et al. Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:964–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc B. 1983;32:307–17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hatcher D. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:3S–6S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah A. Use of MRI in orthodontics—a review. J Imaging Interv Radiol. 2017;1:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tai K, Park JH, Hayashi K, Yanagi Y, Asaumi JI, Iida S. Preliminary study evaluating the accuracy of MRI images on CBCT images in the field of orthodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36(2):211–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod. 2004;31:154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryan DP, Bianchi J, Ignácio J, Wolford LM, Gonçalves JR. Cone-beam computed tomography airway measurements: can we trust them? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;156:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Winnberg A, Pancherz H, Westesson PL. Head posture and hyo-mandibular function in man. A synchronized electromyographic and videofluorographic study of the open-close-clench cycle. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Muto T, Kanazawa M. Positional change of the hyoid bone at maximal mouth opening. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;77:451–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sahin Sağlam AM, Uydas NE. Relationship between head posture and hyoid position in adult females and males. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated life-time attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kieser JA, Farland MG, Jack H, Farella M, Wang Y, Rohrle O. The role of oral soft tissues in swallowing function: what can tongue pressure tell us? Aust Dent J. 2014;59:155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mete A, Akbudak IH. Functional anatomy and physiology of airway. Intech Open J. 2018;89:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oh CH, Ji GY, Yoon SH, Hyun D, Choi CG, Lim HK, et al. Surface landmarks do not correspond to exact levels of the cervical spine: references according to the sex, age and height. Korean J Spine. 2014;11:178–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mattos CT, Cruz CV, da Matta TC, Pereira LA, Solon-de-Mello PA, Ruelas AC, et al. Reliability of upper airway linear, area, and volumetric measurements in cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145:188–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Brent Jorgensen, Dr. Alan Kai, and Dr. Darshan Patel for providing assistance in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author's contribution to the submission: IAH: contributed to leading the research; reviewing the literature prior to starting the research/manuscript; editing and finalizing the figure; presenting the research in the form of PowerPoint and poster presentation and receiving feedback to improve on the manuscript; writing, reviewing, editing the manuscript; working with all authors and including their input on the manuscript; JHP: contributed to supervising the research; coming with ideas to start and expand on the research; improving illustration, tables, figures; reviewing and editing the research as an author/editor; final approval of the manuscript; corresponding author; EJWL: contributed to expanding the research ideas; introducing a software that will help with the research/data collection; initial input and finalizing on landmarks for the study; reviewing and editing the manuscript as an author and editor; MZ: contributed to reviewing the literature prior to starting the research; data collection since he has the most experience with the software; initial input and finalizing on landmarks for the study; teaching the software to other authors especially Dr. Samawi; editing the paper; YSAS: contributed reviewing the literature prior to starting the research; one of the main people on data collection; finalizing on landmarks for the study; learning and teaching the software to all authors at Mesa, AZ; RCB: contributed to the IRB approval process; doing all the statistical analysis, and writing the statistical analysis for the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Hyun Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Ivan A. Halim, Jae Hyun Park, Eric J. W. Liou, Mohammad Zeinalddin, Yazan Sharif Al Samawi and R. Curtis Bay declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Animal and/or human studies

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: In the original publication of the article the fourth author name was incorrectly published. The correct name is given in this correction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halim, I.A., Park, J.H., Liou, E.J.W. et al. Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for tongue space measurements in the field of orthodontics. Oral Radiol 37, 256–266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00443-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00443-0

Keywords

Navigation