Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Semi-automated three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of mandibular condyles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to research the mandibular condyle volumes of the Turkish subpopulation by sex, age, laterality, and posterior occlusal support, to provide volumetric data for young and old patient groups.

Methods

The CBCT images of 690 condyles from 345 patients (165 females and 180 males) were assessed. Patients aged 18–25 years were chosen for the younger group, and 45–70 years for the older group. The dental statuses of the older patient group were divided into three categories, based on the Eichner index. All the CBCT images were transferred to the three-dimensional volumetric analysis software, ITK-Snap (Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory (PICSL) at the University of Pennsylvania and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute (SCI) at the University of Utah) and analyzed with sagittal, coronal, and axial sections. Mandibular condyles were defined using semi-automatic segmentation, then manual segmentation was performed to ensure accuracy. Analyses were performed using MedCalc statistical software. The p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean right condyle volume for the whole sample (n = 345) was 1678.8 mm3 and the left condyle volume was 1661.3 mm3. Males had a larger condyle volume than females in both the younger and older patient groups (p = 0.035, p < 0.01, respectively). The Eichner index did not correlate significantly with condylar volume in the older patient group (p = 0.134, p = 0.122).

Conclusion

There were significant differences between the volumes of mandibular condyles for different sex, while there were no significant differences in relation to age, laterality, and posterior occlusal support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. St Louis: Elsevier/Mosby; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ishibashi H, Takenoshita Y, Ishibashi K, Oka M. Age-related changes in the human mandibular condyle: a morphologic, radiologic, and histologic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:1016–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Safi A-F, Kauke M, Grandoch A, Nickenig H-J, Zöller JE, Kreppel M. Age-related volumetric changes in mandibular condyles. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:510–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saccucci M, Polimeni A, Festa F, Tecco S. Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis. Head Face Med. 2012;8:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahn SJ, Chang MS, Choi JH, Yang IH, An JS, Heo MS. Relationships between temporomandibular joint disk displacements and condylar volume. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:192–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. da Silva RJ, Valadares Souza CV, Souza GA, Ambrosano GMB, Freitas DQ, San’Atana E, et al. Changes in condylar volume and joint spaces after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:511–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulétreau P, Frey R, Breton P, Freidel M. Focus on the effect of orthognathic surgery on condylar remodeling. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2004;105:283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conte R, Forin Valvecchi F, Gracco AL, Bruno G, de Stefani A. Condylar dysfunctional remodeling and recortication: a case-control study. Minerva Stomatol. 2019;68:74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen J, Sobue T, Utreja A, Kalajzic Z, Xu M, Kilts T, et al. Sex differences in chondrocyte maturation in the mandibular condyle from a decreased occlusal loading model. Calcif Tissue Int. 2011;89:123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nascimento Falcão I, Cal Alonso MBC, da Silva LH, Lopes SLPC, Comar LP, Costa ALF. 3D morphology analysis of TMJ articular eminence in magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5130241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5130241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, Polimeni A, Pagnoni M, Cordasco G, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saccucci M, D’Attilio M, Rodolfino D, Festa F, Polimeni A, Tecco S. Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II and class III young adult subjects. Head Face Med. 2012;8:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Enomoto A, Watahiki J, Yamaguchi T, Irie T, Tachikawa T, Maki K. Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:66–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Akhlaghian M, Abolvardi M. Is mandibular fossa morphology and articular eminence inclination associated with temporomandibular dysfunction? J Dent (Shiraz, Iran). 2016;17:134–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin ÖS, Küçük M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1812–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, Cappella A, Panzeri MM, Oliva AG, et al. Anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa: an innovative metrical assessment based on 3D segmentation on head CT-scan. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;41(5):523–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallaeys K, Kacem A, Legoux H, Le Tenier M, Hamitouche C, Arbab-Chirani R. 3D dento-maxillary osteolytic lesion and active contour segmentation pilot study in CBCT: semi-automatic vs manual methods. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20150079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1116–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nota A, Caruso S, Ehsani S, Baldini A, Tecco S. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of mandibular condyle changes in growing subjects: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Cranio. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2018.1537088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goulart DR, Muñoz P, Cantín López MG, de Moraes M, Olate S. Comparative evaluation of condylar volume between patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia and class III dentofacial deformity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:180–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alexiou K, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K. Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li G, Qian H, Guo S, Wang D, Sun C, Du Y, et al. Assessment of aging characteristics of female condylar trabecular structure by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2019;35:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Koshab M, Nambiar P, John J. Assessment of condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in south-east Asians. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0121682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E, Laskin D. Comparison of the stress direction on the TMJ in patients with class I, II, and III skeletal relationships. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmed NF, Samir SM, Ashmawy MS, Farid MM. Cone beam computed tomographic assessment of mandibular condyle in Kennedy class I patients. Oral Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00413-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giesen EBW, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TMGJ. Changed morphology and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the mandibular condyles of edentate people. J Dent Res. 2004;83:255–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Levartovsky S, Gavish A, Nagar Y, Sarphati L, Levartovsky D, Winocur E. The association between dental status and temporomandibular osseous changes: a morphological study on Roman–Byzantine skeletons. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:888–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eichner K. Uber eine Gruppeneinteilung der Lunckengebisse fur die Prothetic. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1955;10:1831–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Widmalm SE, Westesson P-L, Kim I-K, Pereira FJ, Lundh H, Tasaki MM. Temporomandibular joint pathosis related to sex, age, and dentition in autopsy material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:416–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was self-funded by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GAŞ conceptualized and designed the study, acquired, interpreted the data, drafted the manuscript, and revised the paper. ZÖ contributed to the data collection and interpreted the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülay Altan Şallı.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Gülay Altan Şallı and Zeynep Öztürkmen declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altan Şallı, G., Öztürkmen, Z. Semi-automated three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of mandibular condyles. Oral Radiol 37, 66–73 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00426-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00426-1

Keywords

Navigation