Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The AquaCrop model was analyzed for simulating sugar beet crop production under four irrigation regimes, three mulching conditions and three furrow irrigation systems in semi-arid region of Pakistan. Irrigation regimes were full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI20), 40% deficit irrigation (DI40) and 60% deficit irrigation (DI60). The mulching practices were No-mulch (NM), black film mulch (BFM) and straw mulch (SM). The furrow irrigation systems were conventional ridge-furrow (CRF) system, medium raised-bed (MRB) system and wide raised-bed (WRB) system. The model was calibrated and validated using the independent data sets of full irrigation and deficit irrigation regimes collected during 2011–12 cropping season. The model performance was evaluated by using different statistical indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), index of agreement (dindex), and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These indicators showed that the model fairly simulated sugar beet canopy cover for all treatments with 3.00 ≤ RMSE ≤ 16.89, 0.84 ≤ dindex ≤ 0.97, and 0.76 ≤ NSE ≤ 0.99. For biomass and root yield, the model performance was excellent under all full irrigation (FI) and mild deficit irrigation (DI20) treatments with RMSE ranged between 0.07 and 1.17, dindex between 0.48 and 0.84, and NSE between 0.42 and 0.86, respectively. However the low values of dindex (0.10 and 0.13) and NSE (−69.32 and −30.63) showed that the model overestimated both the biomass and root yield when 20% deficit irrigation was applied without mulch in WRB system. The model also over estimated the yield and biomass when 40% deficit irrigation was applied in CRF system. The highest overestimation (dindex: 0.10 to 0.11; NSE: −50.92 to −70.55) was observed when highest stress level (DI60) was applied in the presence of BFM in CRF system. Based on the model’s overall performance, the AquaCrop application is recommended for developing efficient farm water management strategies in the semi-arid regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alishiri R, Paknejad F, Aghayari F (2014) Simulation of sugarbeet growth under different water regimes and nitrogen levels by AquaCrop. Intl J Biosci 4(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrig Drain paper no. 56. FAO, Rome, p 300

    Google Scholar 

  • Arshad AM, Ibrahim W (2014) Effect of regulated deficit irrigation on photosynthesis, photosynthetic active radiation on yield of sorghum cultivar. J Biol Agric Healthcare 4(2):107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2013) Asian development outlook 2013: Asia’s energy challenge, Mandaluyong City, Philippines

  • Awan UK, Liaqat UW, Choi M, Ismaeel A (2016) A SWAT modeling approach to assess the impact of climate change on consumptive water use in lower Chenab Canal area of Indus basin. Hydrol Res. doi:10.2166/nh.2016.102

  • Chukalla AD, Krol MS, Hoekstra AY (2015) Green and blue water footprint reduction in irrigated agriculture: effect of irrigation techniques, irrigation strategies and mulching. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19(12):4877–4891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang T, Hao M, Guo S, Cai G (2003) Effect of plastic film mulch on water and nitrogen use by spring maize and on fate of applied nitrogen in the southern loess plateau. J Appl Ecol 14(11):1901–1905

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahani HJ, Izzi G, Oweis TY (2009) Parameterization and evaluation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agron J 101:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D (2009) Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric Water Manag 96:1275–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan (GOP) (2014–2015) Pakistan economic survey. Economic Affairs Division, Pakistan

    Google Scholar 

  • Heris AM, Nazemi AH, Sadraddini AA (2014) Effects of deficit irrigation on the yield, yield components, water and irrigation water use efficiency of spring canola. Iran J Biodivers Environ Sci 5(2):44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Igbadun HE, Ramalan AA, Oiganji E (2012) Effects of regulated deficit irrigation and mulch on yield, water use and crop water productivity of onion in Samaru, Nigeria. Agric Water Manag 109:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal MA, Shen Y, Stricevic R, Pei H, Sun H, Amiri E, Penas A, Rio SD (2014) Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agric Water Manag 135:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalota SK (1993) Evaporation through a soil mulch in relation to mulch characteristics and evaporability. Aust J Soil Res 31(2):131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME (Ed) (1980) Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. Am Soc Agric Eng, Monograph, St. Joseph, Michigan, pp 501–580

  • Khonok A (2013) The evaluation of water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in irrigation condition and mulch. Sci Agric 2(3):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu EK, He WQ, Yan CR (2014) “White revolution” to “white pollution” − agricultural plastic film mulch in China. Environ res Lett 9(9): (091001)

  • Michael AM (Ed) (1978) Irrigation theory and practice. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd., 576, Masjid Road, Jangpura, New Delhi, pp 542–543

  • Naheed G, Rasul G (2010) Projections of crop water requirement in Pakistan under global warming. Pak J Meteorol 7(13):45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaverdinejad V, Khorsand A, Shahidi A (2014) Evaluation and comparison of AquaCrop and FAO models for yield prediction of winter wheat under environmental stresses. J Biol Environ Sci 4(6):438–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothaar W, Kamal S, Haq SH (1965) Sugar beet seed production in the northern regions of West Pakistan. Tech bull no. 7, Dept Agric Govt West Pak

  • Salemi H, Soom MAM, Lee TS, Mousavi SF, Ganji A, Yusoff MK (2011) Application of AquaCrop model in deficit irrigation management of winter wheat in arid region. Afr J Agric Res 610(10):2204–2215

    Google Scholar 

  • Salunkhe R, Kale MU, Wadatkar SB, Rao KVR (2015) Validation of crop model for drip irrigated capsicum under polyethylene mulch. Int J Trop Agric 33(2):359–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Saha S, Modal S (2013) Modelling irrigated wheat production using the FAO AquaCrop model in West Bengal, India, for sustainable agriculture. Irrig Drain 62:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (2012) Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrig Drain Paper No 66: 124–131

  • Tagar A, Chandio FA, Mari IA, Wagan B (2012) Comparative study of drip and furrow irrigation methods at farmer’s field in Umarkot. Intl J Bio Biomol Agril Food Biotech Eng 6(9):788–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli AR, Moghadam MM, Sepaskhah AR (2015) Evaluation of the AquaCrop model for barley production under deficit irrigation and rainfed condition in Iran. Agric Water Manag 161:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic M, Albrizio R, Zivotic L, Abi Saab MT, Stöckle C, Steduto P (2009) Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron J 101(3):509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toumi J, Er-Raki S, Ezzahar J, Khabba S, Jarlan L, Chehbouni A (2016) Performance assessment of AquaCrop model for estimating evapotranspiration, soil water content and grain yield of winter wheat in Tensift Al Haouz (Morocco): application to irrigation management. Agric Water Manag 163:219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USSL (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA, Handbook, 60, p 147

  • Wang C, Tian X, Li S (2004) Effects of plastic sheet-mulching on ridge for water-harvesting cultivation on WUE and yield of winter wheat. Sci Agric Sinica 37(2):208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisler FD, Acock B, Baker DN, Fye RE, Hodges HF, Lambert JR, Lemmon HE, McKinion JM, Reddy VR (1986) Crop simulation models in agronomic systems. Adv Agron 40:141–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Report (2012) Development of Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM) for Indus Basin – Challenges and Opportunities

  • Zeleke KT, Luckett D, Cowley R (2011) Calibration and testing of the FAO AquaCrop model for Canola. Agron J 103(6):1610–1618

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar, 25120, Pakistan

    Abdul Malik, Muhammad Ajmal & Taj Ali Khan

  2. Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

    Abdul Sattar Shakir

  3. Water Management Department, Agricultural University Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Muhammad Jamal Khan

Authors
  1. Abdul Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdul Sattar Shakir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Ajmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Jamal Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Taj Ali Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Ajmal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, A., Shakir, A.S., Ajmal, M. et al. Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan. Water Resour Manage 31, 4275–4292 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1745-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1745-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation