Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comprehensive Study of the Effect of Input Data on Hydrology and non-point Source Pollution Modeling

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Watershed models have been applied to develop management strategies for water resources, but its effectiveness is limited by predictive uncertainties associated with input data. In this study, we focus on the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall and DEM resolution on hydrology and non-point source pollution (H/NPSP) modeling of a large watershed. The uncertainty introduced by spatial distribution of rainfall was determined by the density of raingauge network, which were estimated by Thiessen polygon method. A range of 16 DEM spatial resolutions, from 30 to 480 m, was examined, and the annual and monthly model outputs based on each resolution were compared. The Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF) was used to quantify the effect of input data uncertainty on watershed H/NPSP modeling of the Yixunhe watershed in China. Results indicated that the rainfall and DEM resolution could contribute significant uncertainty in model input information and the carry-magnify effect caused even larger uncertainty in the H/NPSP modeling. This uncertainty was magnified from hydrology modeling (stream flow) into NPSP modeling (TP, TN, NO3-N and NH3-N). From a practical point of view, it is indicated that every effort must be made to collect spatial data at high resolution to minimize uncertainty in model simulations. The results of this study provide useful information for better understanding and estimating uncertainties in the HSPF model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams R, Western AW, Seed AW (2012) An analysis of the impact of spatial variability in rainfall on runoff and sediment predictions from a distributed model. Hydrol Process 26:3263–3280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Abed NA, Al-Sharif M (2008) Hydrological Modeling of Zarqa River Basin – Jordan using the hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF). Model Water Resour Manag 22(9):1203–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bárdossy A, Das T (2008) Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck MB (1987) Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour Res 23:1393–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL, Jobes TH, Donigian AS (2001) Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF). User’s Manual for Release 12. U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, in cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey, Office of Surface Water, Reston, VA

  • Boomer K, Li X, Weller D (2011) Applying Multiple Models to Inform Watershed Management and Land Use Planning in a Coastal Community. The NOAA/UNH Cooperative In-stitute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET).

  • Borah DK, Bera M (2003) Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review and mathematical bases. T ASAE 46(6):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cryer SA, Fouch MA, Peacock AL, Havens PL (2001) Characterizing agrochemical patterns and effective BMPs for surface waters using mechanistic modeling and GIS. Environ Model Assess 6(3):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Ramirez JN, McAnally WH, Martin JL (2012) Sensitivity of simulating hydrologic processes to gauge and radar rainfall data in subtropical coastal catchments. Water Resour Manag 26(12):3515–3538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B, Earls J (2009) Resample or not effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 23(12):1714–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Li X, Zhang W Wang H (2014) Variations in source apportionments of nutrient load among seasons and hydrological years in a semi-arid watershed: GWLF model results. Environ Sci Pollut R 1–10

  • Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-streamflow models. Water Resour Res 28:1015–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghayoor HA (1991) Prediction of peak runoff from rainfall in a temperate area. Water Resour Manag 5(1):63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im S, Brannan M, Mostaghimi S, Cho J (2005) Simulating fecal coliform bacteria loading from an urbanizing watershed. J Environ Sci Health A 39(3):663–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katie Price S, Purucker ST, Kraemer SR, Babendreier JE, Knightes CD (2014) Comparison of radar and gauge precipitation data in watershed models across varying spatial and temporal scales. Hydrol Process 28(9)

  • Li XY, Du XZ, Wang HL (2013) Key watershed modelling research needs and case studies in TMDLmethodology transition to northern China, The 16th International Conference on Diffuse Pollution and Eutrophication, Beijing, China, 18 – 23 August, 2013

  • Li X, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2010) Watershed model calibration using multi-objective optimization and multi-site averaging. J Hydrol 380(3):277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Jing C, Coles NA, Chaplot V, Moore NJ, Wu J (2013) Evaluating DEM source and resolution uncertainties in the soiland water assessment tool. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(1):209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes VL (1996) On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modeling. Catena 28:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Software 18(8–9):761–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamoud YM (2007) Enhancing hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN model channel hydraulic representation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43(5):1280–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamoud YM, Lourdes MP (2012) Effect of temporal and spatial rainfall resolution on HSPF predictive performance and parameter estimation. J Hydrol Eng 17:377–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudin L, Perrin C, Mathevet T, Andre´assian V, Michel C (2006) Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models. J Hydrol 320:62–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribarova I, Ninov P, Cooper D (2008) Modeling nutrient pollution during a first flood event using HSPF software: Iskar River case study, Bulgaria. Ecol Model 211(1–2):241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZY, Liao Q, Hong Q, Gong Y (2012a) An overview of research on agricultural non-point source pollution modeling in China. Sep Purif Technol 84:104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Chen L, Liao Q, Liu R, Hong Q (2012b) Impact of spatial rainfall variability on hydrology and nonpoint source pollution modeling. J Hydrol 472–473:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD (2013) Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds. Water Resour Manag 27(6):1737–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed KH, Goodrich DC, Myers DE, Sorooshian S (2003) Spatial characteristics of thunderstorm rainfall fields and their relation to runoff. J Hydrol 271:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XJ, Liu RM, Gong YW (2011) Simulation of the effect of land use/cover change on non-point source pollution load in Xiangxi River watershed. Chin J Environ Eng 5:1194–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood GB, Wiant HV, Loy RJ, Miles JA (1990) Centroid sampling: a variant of importance sampling for estimating the volume of sample trees of radiate pine. Forest Ecol Manage 36:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehe E, Becker R, Bárdossy A, Plate E (2005) Uncertainty of simulated catchment sale 5 runoff response in the presence of threshold processes: role of initial soil moisture and precipitation. J Hydrol 315:183–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Liu R, Bao Y, Wang J, Yu W, Shen Z (2014) Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed. Water Res 53:132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Benoy G, Chow TL, Rees HW, Daigle J, Meng F (2010) Impacts of accuracy and resolution of conventional and LiDAR based DEMs on parameters used in hydrologic modeling. Water Resour Manag 24(7):1363–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was supported by Open Laboratory of Water Conservancy and Science of Key Disciplines in Henan Province, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51079131), and the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams of ‘Ecosystem Processes and Services’ (Grant No.KZCX2-YW-T13). The authors would like to thank the Chengde Branch of Hebei Provincial Survey Bureau of Hydrology & Water Resources for providing hydrological data. Finally the authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and the Editor of the journal. Their detailed suggestions have resulted in an improved manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Water Conservancy and Science of Key Disciplines in Henan Province, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China

    Huiliang Wang

  2. College of Water Conservancy & Environmental Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China

    Huiliang Wang, Zening Wu & Caihong Hu

Authors
  1. Huiliang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zening Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caihong Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiliang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Wu, Z. & Hu, C. A Comprehensive Study of the Effect of Input Data on Hydrology and non-point Source Pollution Modeling. Water Resour Manage 29, 1505–1521 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0890-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0890-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation