Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the potential impacts of future climate change on the hydrological response in the upper reach of the Spree River catchment using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The model was calibrated for ten years (1997–2006) and validated with the data from four years (2007–2010) using average monthly stream flow. The impact of future climate change on precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration and stream flow was then investigated from two different downscaled climate models (CLM and WETTREG2010) under SRES A1B scenarios for two future periods (2021–2030 and 2041–2050). Besides that, sensitivity analysis was carried out with and without observations, to test robustness of the sensitivity algorithm used in the model. Results of the determination coefficient R2 and Nasch-Sutcliff efficiency ENC were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively, during the calibration; 0.71 and 0.70, respectively, during the validation. Although some parameters were changed their sensitiveness ranking when the model run with observations, the SWAT model was, however, able to predict the top influential parameters without observations. According to 12 realizations from the two downscaled climate models, annual stream flow from 2021–2030 (2041–2050) is predicted to decrease by 39 % (43 %). This corresponds to an increase in annual evapotranspiration from 2021–2030 (2041–2050) of 36 % (38 %). The upper reach of the Spree River catchment will likely experience a significant decrease in stream flow due to the increasing in the evapotranspiration rates. This study could be of use for providing insight into the availability of future stream flow, and to provide a planning tool for this area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbaspour KC, Johanson CA, Van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadoze Zone J 3(4):1340–1352
Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J et al (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333(2–4):413–430. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
Al-Mukhtar M, Dunger V, Merkel B (2013) Evaluation of the climate generator model CLIGEN for rainfall data simulation in Bautzen catchment area, Germany. Hydrol Res. doi:10.2166/nh.2013.073
Al-Mukhtar M, Dunger V, Merkel B (2014) Runoff and sediment yield modeling by means of WEPP in the Bautzen dam catchment, Germany. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3113-0
Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89
Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6(3):279–298
Chen H, Xu C-Y, Guo S (2012) Comparison and evaluation of multiple GCMs, statistical downscaling and hydrological models in the study of climate change impacts on runoff. J Hydrol 434–435:36–45. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.040
Chien H, Yeh PJ-F, Knouft JH (2013) Modeling the potential impacts of climate change on streamflow in agricultural watersheds of the midwestern United States. J Hydrol 491:73–88. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.026
Duan QY, Gupta VK, Sorooshian S (1993) Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. J Optim Theory Appl 76(3):501–521. doi:10.1007/BF00939380
EEA Environment European Agency (2012) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012. Copenhagen
Fiseha BM, Setegn SG, Melesse AM, Volpi E, Fiori A (2014) Impact of climate change on the hydrology of upper tiber river basin using bias corrected regional climate model. Water Resour Manag 28(5):1327–1343
Hardyanto W, Merkel B (2007) Introducing probability and uncertainty in groundwater modeling with FEMWATER-LHS. J Hydrol 332(1–2):206–213. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.035
Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1:96–99
Hay LE, Clark MP, Wilby RL, Gutowski WJ, Leavesley GH, Pan Z et al (2002) Use of regional climate model output for hydrologic simulations. J Am Meteorol Soc 3:571–590
Jha M, Pan Z, Takle ES, Gu R (2004) Impacts of climate change on streamflow in the upper mississippi river basin: A regional climate model perspective. J Geophys Res 109, D09105. doi:10.1029/2003JD003686
Kuczera G, Parent E (1998) Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the metropolis algorithm. J Hydrol 211(1–4):69–85. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X
Monteith JL (1965) Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London. Ser. B.(281): 277–329
Narsimlu B, Gosain AK, Chahar BR (2013) Assessment of future climate change impacts on water resources of upper sind river basin, India using SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3647–3662
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part1-A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR (2005) Soil and water assessment tool input/output file documentation. version, Blackland research center, texas agriculture experiment station. Temple, Texas
Park J, Park M, Ahn S, Park G (2011) Assessment of future climate change impacts on water quantity and quality for a mountainous dam watershed using SWAT. J Am Soc Agric Biol Eng 54(5):1725–1737
Potta S (2004) Application of stochastic downscaling techniques to global climate model data for regional climate prediction. Louisiana State University, Master’s thesis
Priestley C, Taylor R (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review. (100): 81–92
Refsgaard JC (1996) Terminology, modeling protocol and classification of hydrological model codes. In Abbott,M. B., Refsgaard, J. C. (Eds.), Distributed Hydrological Modelling. Kluwer academic. pp.17–39
Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 198(1–4):69–97. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03329-X
Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M et al (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5: Part1:Model description. Report Nr.349. Max Planck Institute of Meteorology. Hamburg
Roeckner E, Brasseur GP, Giorgetta M, Jacob D, Jungclaus J, Reick C et al (2006) Climate projections for 21st century. max planck institute of meteorology. Hamburg, Germany
Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott M (2000) Sensitivity analysis. John Wiley, New York
Schuol J, Abbaspour KC, Yang H, Srinivasan R, Zehnder AJB (2008) Modeling blue and green water availability in Africa. Water Resour Res 44(7), W07406
Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC-Erosion/ productivity impact calculator 1 model documentation. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Tech. Bull, P.1768
Sivapalan M, Blöschl G, Zhang L, Vertessy R (2003) Downward approach to hydrological prediction. Hydrol Process 17(11):2101–2111. doi:10.1002/hyp.1425
Sloan PG, Moore ID, Coltharp GB, Eigel JD (1984) Modeling surface and subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds. Water Resources Research. Report 142, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
USDA-SCS (1972) Section 4:Hydrology. In National Engineering Handbook. Washington, D.C., USDA Soil Converation Service
Van Griensven A, Meixner T (2006) Methods to quantify and identify the sources of uncertainty for river basin water quality models. Water Sci Technol 53(1):51–59
Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324(1–4):10–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008
Williams JR (1969) Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficient. ASAE 12(1):100–103
Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold JG (2010) ArcSWAT interface for swat2009 user’s guide. Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas
Xu CY (2000) Modelling the effects of climate change on water resources in central Sweden. Water Resour Manag 14:177–189
Xu CY, Widén E, Halldin S (2005) Modelling hydrological consequences of climate change—progress and challenges. Adv Atmos Sci 22(6):789–797. doi:10.1007/BF02918679
Xu Y-P, Zhang X, Ran Q, Tian Y (2013) Impact of climate change on hydrology of upper reaches of Qiantang River Basin, East China. J Hydrol 483:51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.004
Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Xia J, Yang H (2008) Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the chaohe basin in China. J Hydrol 358(1–2):1–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.012
Zhang H, Haan C, Nofziger D (1993) An approach to estimating uncertainties in modeling transport of solutes through soils. J Contam Hydrol 12:35–50
Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Hao F (2007) Predicting hydrologic response to climate change in the Luohe river basin using the SWAT model. Trans ASABE 50(3):901–910
Zhang A, Zhang C, Fu G, Wang B, Bao Z, Zheng H (2012) Assessments of impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff with SWAT for the Huifa river basin, northeast China. Water Resour Manag 26(8):2199–2217
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) and Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Iraq for the financial support during the period of this study. Special thanks to Prof. Dr. Jörg Matschullat for his suggestions and for Dr. Stephanie Hansel from the Interdisciplinary Environmental Center for her support to provide the future climate data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Mukhtar, M., Dunger, V. & Merkel, B. Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Hydrology of the Upper Reach of the Spree River: Germany. Water Resour Manage 28, 2731–2749 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0675-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0675-2