Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil chemical properties in forest patches across multiple spatiotemporal scales in mid-Atlantic U.S. metropolitan areas

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temperate deciduous forests in the United States are in the most densely populated states across the northern and mid-Atlantic east coast. Land development and associated human activities have resulted in small forests that are susceptible to various anthropogenic influences across multiple spatiotemporal scales. The objective of this study was to assess soil chemistry in forest patches of various sizes embedded within an urban development gradient. We established 36 forest sites along the U.S. east coast in northern Delaware and southeastern Pennsylvania, and assessed soil chemical properties across metro (city size), landscape (surrounding urban density), patch (forest patch size/shape, non-native plant invasion), and temporal (time since forest canopy closure) scales. At the metro and landscape scale, we found significantly greater soil Cu, Zn, and S concentrations in forest patches with greater surrounding urban density. At the forest patch scale, soil pH and Ca increased with greater abundance of non-native invasive plants within the forest, whereas soil organic matter decreased with plant invasion. However, increased soil pH and Ca with decreasing SOM may also be a result of land use legacies since we found younger forests had significantly more plant invasion. Forest patch size and shape were primarily related to urban density, where smaller forests with greater edge to interior ratios had greater soil Cu and Zn concentrations. These findings support the importance of considering forest patch structure (size and shape), site legacies, proximity to urban land uses, and duration of intact canopy in understanding patterns and processes in forest soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available on the FRAME website https://sites.udel.edu/frame/published-data/

References

  • Bååth E (1989) Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations (a review). Water Air Soil Pollut 47:335–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank RR (2008) Biogeochemistry of plant invasion: a case study with downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:226–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB (2002) Ecological Climatology. Concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiskey J, Schmit JP, Sanders S, Campbell P, Mitchell B (2009) Forest vegetation monitoring in eastern parks. Park Sci 26:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • DGS (Delaware Geological Survey) (2018) Aerial photography. Delaware environmental monitoring and analysis Center. Available: http://demac.udel.edu/data/aerial-photography/

  • Delaware Invasive Species Council (2019) Available: https://delawareinvasives.net

  • Efroymson RA, Suter II GW, Sample BE, Jones DS (1997) Preliminary remediation goals for ecological endpoints. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ES/ER/TM-162/R2. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ecobox/epa-ecobox-tools-effects-terrestrial, Accessed on: February 25, 2020

  • Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2007) Ecological soil screening levels (eco-SSL) for copper, for zinc. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ecobox/epa-ecobox-tools-effects-terrestrial, Accessed on: February 25, 2020

  • Flinn KM, Vellend M (2005) Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 3(5):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2014) Urban ecology: science of cities. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology. Island Press, Washington DC, Science and solutions

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavilán RG, Sánchez-Mata D, Gaudencio M, Gutiérrez-Girón A, Vilches B (2016) Impact of the non-indigenous shrub species Spartium junceum (Fabaceae) on native vegetation in Central Spain. J Plant Ecol 9(2):132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song D-X, Townshend (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper KA, MacDonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE Jr, Dupont C et al (2019) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.3–0 Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc

  • Heneghan L, Steffen J, Fagen K (2006) Interactions of an introduced shrub and introduced earthworms in an Illinois urban woodland: impact on leaf litter decomposition. Pedobiologia 50:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulson J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K (2015) Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States – representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 81(5):345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Horikoshi M, Tang Y (2016) Ggfortify: data visualization tools for statistical analysis results. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggfortify

  • Howard TG, Gurevitch J, Hyatt L, Carreiro M, Lerdau M (2004) Forest invisibility in communities in southeastern New York. Biol Invasions 6:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner CD, Steinman J, Hutchinson TF, Ristau TE, Royo AA (2014) The distribution of a non-native (Rosa multiflora) and native (Kalmia latifolia) shrub in mature closed-canopy forests across soil fertility gradients. Plant Soil 377:259–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leicht-Young SA, O’Donnell H, Latimer AM, Silander JA Jr (2009) Effects of an invasive plant species, Celastrus orbiculatus, on soil composition and processes. Am Midl Nat 161(2):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lookingbill T, Schmit JP, Carter SL (2012) GRTS and Graphs: Monitoring Natural Resources in Urban Landscapes. In: Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ, Cooper AB, Licht DS (eds) Design and Analysis of Long-term Ecological Monitoring Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 361–380

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett GM, Traynor MM, Pouyat RV, Carreiro MM, Zhu W, Baxter JW (2000) Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban-rural gradient. Environ Sci Technol 34:4294–4300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDermot CR, Minocha R, D’Amico V, Long S, Trammell TLE (2020) Red maple (L.) trees demonstrate acclimation to urban conditions in deciduous forests embedded in cities. PLoS one 15(7):e0236313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MGE, Suarez-Castro AF, Martinez-Harms M, Maron M, McAlpine C, Gaston KJ, Johansen K, Rhodes JR (2015) Reframing landscape fragmentation’s effects on ecosystem services. TREE 30(4)

  • National Invasive Species Information Center (2019) US Department of Agriculture Available at: https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Staff (2020) United States Department of Agriculture. Web soil survey. Available at: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

  • Oke TR (1973) City size and the urban heat island. Atmos Environ 7:769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olge DH, Wheeler P, Dinno A (2019) FSA: fisheries stock analysis. R package version 0.8.25, Available at: https://github.com/droglenc/FSA

  • Oswald WW, Foster DR, Shuman BN, Chilton ES, Doucette DL, Duranleau DL (2020) Conservation implications of limited native American impacts in pre-contact New England. Nat Sustain 3:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0466-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Geological Survey (2018) Historic aerial photographs of Pennsylvania. Penn pilot. Available: http://www.pennpilot.psu.edu/index.html

  • Pouyat RV, McDonnell MJ (1991) Heavy metal accumulations in forest soils along an urban-rural gradient in southeastern New York, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut 57-58:797–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Trammell TLE (2019) Climate change and urban forest soils. In Dev Soil Sci 36:189–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Yesilonis ID, Szlavecz K, Csuzdi C, Hornung E, Korsos Z, Russell-Anelli J, Giorgio V (2008) Response of forest soil properties to urbanization gradients in three metropolitan areas. Landsc Ecol 23:1187–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Carreiro MM, Groffman PM, Zuckerman M (2009) Investigative approaches to urban biogeochemical cycles: New York metropolitan area and Baltimore as case studies. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs A, Breuste J (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, Oxford, pp 329–354

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Yesilonis ID, Groffman PM, Schwarz K (2010) Chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of urban soils. In pages 119-152. In: Aitkenhead-Peterson J, Volder A (eds) Urban ecosystem ecology (agronomy monograph 55). ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentch JS, Fortney RH, Stephenson SL, Adams HS, Grafton WN, Anderson JT (2005) Vegetation-site relationships of roadside plant communities in West Virginia, USA. J Appl Ecol 42:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battlin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman LA, Pearsall H, Eisenman TS, Conway TM, Fahey RT, Landry S, Vogt J, van Doorn NS, Grove JM, Locke DH, Bardekjian AC, Battles JJ, Cadenasso ML, van den Bosch CCK, Avolio M, Berland A, Jenerette GD, Mincey SK, Pataki DE, Staudhammer C (2018) Human and biophysical legacies shape contemporary urban forests: a literature synthesis. Urban For Urban Green 31:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith IA, Hutyra LR, Reinmann AB, Marrs JK, Thompson JR (2018) Piecing together the fragments: elucidating edge effects on forest carbon dynamics front Ecol environ doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1793

  • Szlavecz K, Placella SA, Pouyat RV, Groffman PM, Csuzdi C, Yesilonis ID (2006) Invasive earthworm species and nitrogen cycling in remnant forest patches. Appl Soil Ecol 32:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Horikoshi M, Li W (2016) Ggfortify: unified interface to visualize statistical result of popular R packages. The R J 8(2):478–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell TLE, Schneid BP, Carreiro MM (2011) Forest soils adjacent to urban interstates: soil physical and chemical properties, heavy metals, disturbance legacies, and relationships with woody vegetation. Urban Ecosyst 14:525–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell TLE, Ralston HA, Scroggins SA, Carreiro MM (2012) Foliar production and decomposition rates in urban forests invaded by the exotic invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii. Biol Invasions 14(3):529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell TLE, D’Amico V, Avolio ML, Mitchell JC, Moore E (2020) Temperate deciduous forests embedded across developed landscapes: younger forests harbor invasive plants and urban forests maintain native species. J Ecol 108:2366–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2013) The United Nations Population Division. Available: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/

  • US Census Bureau (2010) The United States Census Bureau. American fact finder. Available: https://www.census.gov/

  • Weathers KC, Lovett G, Likens G, Lathrop R (2000) The effect of landscape features on deposition to Hunter Mountain, Catskill Mountains, New York. Ecol Apps 10(2):528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers KC, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2001) Forest edges as nutrient and pollutant concentrators: potential synergisms between fragmentation, forest canopies, and the atmosphere. Conserv Biol 15(6):1506–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CSC, Li X, Thornton I (2006) Urban environmental geochemistry of trace metals. Environ Pollut 142:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yesilonis ID, Pouyat RV, Neerchal NK (2008) Spatial distribution of metals in soils in Baltimore, Maryland: role of native parent material, proximity to major roads, housing age and screening guidelines. Environ Pollut 156:723–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zitter C, Turner MG (2018) Current and historical land use influence soil-based ecosystem services in an urban landscape. Ecol App 28:643–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Christina Mitchell for field assistance and anonymous reviewers for valuable input on a previous manuscript version.

Funding

The University of Delaware Research Foundation and the USDA Forest Service (#16-JV-11242308-122) funded this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    Tara L. E. Trammell & Richard V. Pouyat

  2. USDA Forest Service, NRS-08, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    Richard V. Pouyat & Vince D’Amico III

Authors
  1. Tara L. E. Trammell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard V. Pouyat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vince D’Amico III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.L.E.T. and R.V.P. formulated the ideas and wrote the manuscript, T.L.E.T analyzed the data and established forest sites in Philadelphia, V.D. established long-term urban forest study, developed methodology, and contributed to the manuscript revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara L. E. Trammell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 803 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trammell, T.L.E., Pouyat, R.V. & D’Amico, V. Soil chemical properties in forest patches across multiple spatiotemporal scales in mid-Atlantic U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Ecosyst 24, 1085–1100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01096-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01096-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation