Skip to main content
Log in

Juggling a “junk-food” diet: responses of an urban bird to fluctuating anthropogenic-food availability

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within highly urban systems, anthropogenic activity often fluctuates cyclically, e.g. between weekdays and weekends. Thus, urban species may regularly experience significant changes in human activity and anthropogenic food abundance over very short time scales. Knowledge of how urban birds cope with such fluctuations may improve our understanding of how some species exploit and thrive in urbanised habitats. In this study, we explore the consequences of highly fluctuating anthropogenic food for Red-winged Starlings Onychognathus morio at the University of Cape Town campus, South Africa. Here, high numbers of students (and therefore anthropogenic food resources) are present during weekdays in term time (high human presence “HHP” days). However, students are largely absent and food outlets closed during weekends and vacation periods (“LHP” days). Using focal observations and morning and evening weights of habituated colour-ringed starlings during the non-breeding season, we investigated how diet, behaviour and daily mass gain differed between HHP and LHP days. We hypothesised that anthropogenic food supply is beneficial to this city-dwelling species. We predicted that on HHP days starlings would consume overall more food and a greater proportion of anthropogenic food items, resulting in less time spent foraging and greater daily mass gain compared to LHP days. We found that on HHP days, starlings consumed more anthropogenic food, however overall food intake, and time budgets were similar to LHP days. Additionally, there was an indication that mass gain was greater on HHP days. Thus, starlings appear to cope with potential food shortage on LHP days by including more natural items in their diet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies JM, Katti M, Schochat E (2007) Living in the city: resource availability, predation and bird population dynamics in urban areas. J Theor Biol 247:36–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson MN, Wang H-L, Nord A, Salmon P, Isaksson C (2015) Composition of physiologically important fatty acids in great tits differs between urban and rural populations on a seasonal basis. Front Ecol Evol 3:93

    Google Scholar 

  • Auman HJ, Meathrel CE, Richardson A (2008) Supersize me: does anthropogenic food change the body condition of silver gulls? A comparison between urbanized and remote, non-urbanized areas. Waterbirds 31:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/. Accessed 17 Apr 2019

  • Bradley CA, Altizer S (2007) Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol Evol 22:95–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brearley G, Rhodes J, Bradley A, Baxter G, Seabrook L, Lunney D, Liu Y, McAlpine C (2013) Wildlife disease prevalence in human-modified landscapes. Biol Rev 88:427–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catto S (2018) Fluctuating human activity and associated anthropogenic food availability affect behaviour and parental care of red-winged starlings. Master of Science University of Cape Town, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciach M, Fröhlich A (2017) Habitat type, food resources, noise and light pollution explain the species composition, abundance and stability of a winter bird assemblage in an urban environment. Urban Ecosyst 20:547–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciach M, Kruszyk R (2010) Foraging of white storks Ciconia ciconia on rubbish dumps on non-breeding grounds. Waterbirds 33:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogan SC, Machovsky-Capuska GE, Senior AM, Martin JM, Major RE, Raubenheimer D (2017) Macronutrient selection of free-ranging urban Australian white ibis (Threskiornis moluccus). Behav Ecol 28:1021–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogan SCP, Raubenheimer D, Zantis SP, Machovsky-Capuska GE (2018) Multidimensional nutritional ecology and urban birds. Ecosphere 9:e02177

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig AJFK (2005) Red-winged starling, Onychognathus morio. Roberts—birds of Southern Africa, 7th edn. The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town, pp 961–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucco M, Malacarne G (1997) The effect of supplemental food on time budget and body condition in the Black redstart Phoenicurus. Ardea 85:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis M (2005) Red-winged starlings that breed in the urban environment. Promerops 263:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Gaston KJ, Sharp SP, McGowan A, Hatchwell BJ (2009) The effect of urbanisation on avian morphology and latitudinal gradients in body size. Oikos 118:251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Chamberlain DE, Hatchwell BJ, Gregory RD, Gaston KJ (2011) What makes an urban bird? Glob Chang Biol 17:32–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg WP, George TL, Black JM (2016) Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stelleri) space use and behavior in campground and non-campground sites in coastal redwood forests. Condor 118:532–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison XA (2014) Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. Peerj 2:e616

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey PAR, Dean WRJ, Ryan PG (2005) Roberts birds of southern Africa. John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town

  • Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Magrath RD, Oteyza JC, Chalfoun AD, Haff TM, Schmidt KA et al (2015) Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives. J Ornithol 156:247–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins AR (2000) Variation in the quality of parental care at falcon nests in South Africa as evidence for postulated differences in food availability. Ardea 88:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A, Banker E (2007) Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter? J Biogeogr 34:638–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Borgström P, Loës P, Schlicht E, Valcu M (2010) Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Curr Biol 20:1735–1739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liker A, Bókony V (2009) Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:7893–7898

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP (2013) The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nat Commun 4:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry H, Lill A, Wong B (2012) Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments. Biol Rev 88:537–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Machovsky-Capuska GE, Senior AM, Zantis SP, Barna K, Cowieson AJ, Pandya S, Pavard C, Shiels M, Raubenheimer D (2015) Dietary protein selection in a free-ranging urban population of common myna birds. Behav Ecol 27:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Springer:19–47

  • Møller AP (2009) Successful city dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic. Oecologia 159:849–858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2012) Urban areas as refuges from predators and flight distance of prey. Behav Ecol 23:1030–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenadic O, Greenacre M (2007) Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: the ca package. J Stat Softw 20

  • Ottoni I, de Oliveira FF, Young RJ (2009) Estimating the diet of urban birds: the problems of anthropogenic food and food digestibility. Appl Anim Behav Sci 117:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Peneaux C, Machovsky-Capuska GE, Raubenheimer D, Lermite F, Rousseau C, Ruhan T, Rodger JC, Griffin AS (2017) Tasting novel foods and selecting nutrient content in a highly successful ecological invader, the common myna. J Avian Biol 48:1432–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R version 3.4.4. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 17 Apr 2019

  • Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2006) Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler. Behav Ecol 18:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Kearns LJ, Shustack DP (2011) Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator–prey relationships. Ecol Appl 21:936–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolando A, Laiolo P, Carisio L (2003) Urbanization and the flexibility of the foraging ecology of the alpine chough Pyrrhocorax graculus in winter. Revue d Ecology 58:337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz C (2008) The establishment of an urban bird population. J Anim Ecol 77(5):1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01420.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoech SJ, Bowman R (2003) Does differential access to protein influence differences in timing of breeding of Florida scrub-jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) in suburban and wildland habitats? Auk 120:1114–1127

    Google Scholar 

  • Seress G, Liker A (2015) Habitat urbanization and its effects on birds. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 61:373–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E (2004) Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city-slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 2:186–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH (2010) Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. BioScience 60:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H (2013) Songs of the city: noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Anim Behav 85:1089–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Griffin AS, Bartomeus I, Boyce H (2011) Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird. PLoS One 6:e19535

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Lapiedra O, González-Lagos C (2013) Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city. Anim Behav 85:1101–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorace A (2002) High density of bird and pest species in urban habitats and the role of predator abundance. Ornis Fennica 79:60–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri J, Sumasgutner P, Hellard E, Koeslag A, Amar A (2017) Stability in prey abundance may buffer Black Sparrowhawks from health impacts of urbanisation. Ibis 159(1):38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12422

    Google Scholar 

  • The CyberTracker Team (1997) CyberTracker: GPS field data collection software 3.443. Available from http://cybertracker.org

  • Tieleman BI, Williams JB (2002) Effects of food supplementation on behavioural decisions of hoopoe-larks in the Arabian Desert: balancing water, energy and thermoregulation. Anim Behav 63:519–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo A, Andersson MN, Wang HL, Salmón P, Watson H, Burdge GC, Isaksson C (2016) Fatty acid profiles of great tit (Parus major) eggs differ between urban and rural habitats, but not between coniferous and deciduous forests. Sci Nat 103:1–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsipoura N, Burger J, Newhouse M, Jeitner C, Gochfeld M, Mizrahi D (2011) Lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic levels in eggs, feathers, and tissues of Canada geese of the New Jersey meadowlands. Environ Res 111:775–784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoda K, Tomita N, Mizutani Y, Narita A, Niizuma Y (2012) Spatio-temporal responses of black-tailed gulls to natural and anthropogenic food resources. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 466:249–259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence and a South Africa (NRF) / Sweden (STINT) science and technology research collaboration (STINT 160909188048). We wish to thank Robert Thomson for assistance with the starling trapping and his advice in planning the project in its early stages, as well as to Caroline Isaksson, Martin Andersson, Hannah Watson, Johan Nilsson and Arne Hegemann for their input on the Red-winged Starling research. We are grateful to Amanda Bourne and Tom Flower for valuable advice on a suitable habituation protocol and to Natasha Pindral for her continuing support in volunteering for the project. MS would also like to express her gratitude for the funding received from the UCT Postgraduate funding office. PS was supported by the Claude Leon Foundation post-doctoral fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Sumasgutner.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 302 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stofberg, M., Cunningham, S., Sumasgutner, P. et al. Juggling a “junk-food” diet: responses of an urban bird to fluctuating anthropogenic-food availability. Urban Ecosyst 22, 1019–1026 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00885-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00885-3

Keywords

Navigation