Skip to main content
Log in

An increase in song pitch of eastern great tits (Parus minor) in response to urban noise at Seoul, Korea

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise may mask effective vocal signal transmission by birds, particularly in notes occurring in lower frequencies. Previous studies have shown a correlation of increased urban noise levels, higher minimum frequency, and lowered bandwidth in Great Tit song (Parus major). We therefore studied the effect of urban noise pollution on the song characteristics of the closely related Eastern Great Tit (EGTs, Parus minor) at Hongneung experimental forests (HEFs) in the metropolitan urban of Seoul, Korea. We analysed the song characteristics of breeding territories of EGTS in total 13 individuals recorded including four individuals at high noise group. EGTs singing in noisier locations exhibited higher minimum & maximum frequency, and lower note & strophe length, and higher bandwidth, replicating the different findings of Great Tits. This data also suggests that several individuals at high noise location exhibited a non-typical song type indicative of structural adaptation to higher noise levels. Although the mechanisms of these correlations are as yet undetermined, it is likely that behavioural plasticity may play a role of vocal signal adaption in an increasingly urbanizing Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bermúdez-Cuamatzin E, Ríos-Chelén AA, Gil D, Garcia CM (2009) Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour 146:1269–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bioacoustics Research Program (2012) Raven pro: interactive sound analysis software (Version 1.5). The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H (2004) The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. J Anim Ecol 73:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav 35:151–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slater PJB (2006) Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt AA, Lambrechts MM (1991) The many meanings of great tit song. Belg J Zool 121:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle C, Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H (2008) Habitat-dependent song divergence at subspecies level in the grey-breasted wood-wren. J Evol Biol 21:1079–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eck S, Martens J. (2006) Systematic notes on Asian birds. 49. A preliminary review of the Aegithalidae, Remizidae and Paridae. Zool Med Leiden 80–5(1). Germany

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Poston R, de Collibus K, Morgan T, Bastain B, Martin C, Jones K, Treminio R (2005) Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the Western U.S. Urban Habitats 3(1):49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco P, Slabbekoorn H (2009) Repertoire size and composition in great tits: a flexibility test using playbacks. Anim Behav 77(1):261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H (2009) A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Anim Behav 78(6):1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1977) The significance of song repertoires: the beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav 25:475–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts MM (1997) Song frequency plasticity and composition of phrase versions in great tits Parus major. Ardea 85:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts MM, Dhondt AA (1986) Male quality, reproduction, and survival in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19(1):57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrechts MM, Dhondt AA (1987) Differences in singing performance between male great tits. Ardea 75:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengagne T, Aubin T, Lauga J, Jouventin P (1999) How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1623–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr B, Wright TF, Dooling RJ (2003) Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal. Anim Behav 65:763–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard E (1911) Le signe de l’elevation de la voix. Ann. Maladies Oreille, Larynx, Nez, Pharynx 37:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1989) Song learning in adult great tits (Parus major): effects of neighbours. Behaviour 108:139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockford EJ, Marshall RC (2009) Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2979–2985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth E, Brumm H (2009) Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? Anim Behav 78(3):637–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patricelli GL, Blickley JL (2006) Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Salaberria C, Gil D (2010) Increase in song frequency in response to urban noise in the great tit (Parus major) as shown by data from the Madrid (Spain) city noise map. Ardeola 57:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:507–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SS, Wilks MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52:591–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267

  • Slabbekoorn H (2004) Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (eds) Nature's music the science of Birdsong. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 178–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, den Boer-Visser A (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Curr Biol 16:2326–2331

  • Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002) Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56:1849–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorjonen J (1986) Song structure and singing strategies in the genus Luscinia in different habitats and geographical areas. Behaviour 98:274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren PS, Katti M, Ermann M (2006) Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise. Anim Behav 71:491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (1991) Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am Nat 138:973–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood WE, Yezerinac SM (2006) Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk 123:650–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chan Ryul Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, C., Park, C.R. An increase in song pitch of eastern great tits (Parus minor) in response to urban noise at Seoul, Korea. Urban Ecosyst 22, 227–233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0809-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0809-z

Keywords

Navigation