Abstract
Urban species often adjust their behavior to survive in urban environments, characterized by the proximity of humans, habitat fragmentation and heterogeneous, fluctuating ecological resources. Several hypotheses have been put forth to explain how species manage living in heterogeneous and complex anthropogenic habitats. The ability of individuals or species to beneficially modify their behaviors in response to changes in the environment has indeed been alternatively explained based on phylogenetic, adaptive, and ontogenic arguments. In this study we investigated the role of sociality as a driver of behavioural flexibility in urban birds. Sociality can be defined as the tendency to associate with conspecifics or form a group and may influence a species’ ability to survive in an urban ecosystem to the extent that it represents advantages to species or individuals in terms of resource exploitation, fitness, and predation risk-avoidance. Given the potential benefits of sociality we hypothesized that sociality is a further characteristic that may explain how species have successfully expanded their range into urbanized areas. Based on this hypothesis, we predicted that pigeons (Columba livia) will show higher behavioural flexibility when in larger groups, whatever their genetic background and living-circumstances. Using pigeons as a model system, we compared 27 groups in France and Italy composed of four different genetic strains and varying living-conditions: free-living feral pigeons in urban areas, free-living domestic pigeons at the property of a local breeder captive, feral pigeons in a French ecological field station, captive domestic pigeons in an Italian ecological station. We tested two standardized behavioral measures of behavioural flexibility: thresholds for fear or neophobia and rates of problem solving. We found that group number affects neophobia and to a lesser extent problem-solving, suggesting that sociality is a factor enhancing birds’ faculties to establish in and cope with heterogeneous urban environments. We consider this hypothesis here as compatible and complementary to existing hypotheses on species’ adaptation to urban ecosystems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atwell JW, Cardoso GC, Whittaker DJ, Campbell-Nelson S, Robertson KW, Kettersona ED (2012) Boldness behavior and stress physiology in a novel urban environment suggest rapid correlated evolutionary adaptation. Behav Ecol 23(5):960–969
Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C (2008) Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62:1951–1964
Beauchamp G (2014) Social predation. Academic Press, London
Beauchamp G (2015) Animal Vigilance. Academic Press, London
Bouchard J, Goodyer W, Lefebvre L (2007) Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn 10:259–266
Bremner-Harrison S, Cypher BL (2010) Reintroducing San Joaquin Kit Fox to vacant or restored lands: identifying optimal source populations and candidate foxes. Prepared for the U.S Bureau of reclamation Central Valley project Conservation Program
Brown CR, Bomberger Brown M (2013) Where has all the road kill gone? Curr Biol 23(6):233–234
Caro T (2007) Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far? Trends Ecol Evol 22:394–400
Carter KD, Brand R, Carter JK, Shorrocks B, Goldizen AW (2013) Social networks, long-term associations and age-related sociability of wild giraffes. Anim Behav 86:901–910
Croci S, Butet A, Clergeau P (2008) Does urbanisation filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? Condor 110:223–240
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie D (eds) (2005) Handbook of the birds of the world vol. 10. Lynx Ediciones, Barcelona
Evans KL, Hatchwell BJ, Parnell M, Gaston KJ (2010) A conceptual framework for the colonization of urban areas: the blackbird Turdus merula as a case study. Biol Rev 85:643–667
Festa-Bianchet M (1991) The social system of bighorn sheep: grouping patterns, kinship and female dominance rank. Anim Behav 42(1):71–82
Greenberg R (1984) Differences in feeding neophobia in the tropical migrant wood warblers, Dendroica castanea and D pensylvanica. J Comp Psychol 98:131–136
Greenberg R (2003) The role of neophobia and Neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. In: Reader SM, Laland KN (eds) Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 175–196
Greenberg R, Mettke-Hofmann C (2001) Ecological aspects of neophobia and Neophilia in birds. Curr Ornithol 16:119–178
Jacquin L, Blottiere M, Haussy L, Perret S, Gasparini J (2012) Prenatal and postnatal parental effects on immunity and growth in ‘lactating’ pigeons. Funct Ecol 26:866–875
Jiguet F, Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D (2012) French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecol 44:58–66
Kettlewell HBD (1961) The phenomenon of industrial melanism in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 6:245–262
Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560
Marino A, Baldi R (2008) Vigilance patterns of territorial guanacos (Lama guanicoe): the role of reproductive interests and predation risk. Ethology 114(4):413–423
McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890
Mettke-Hofmann C, Winkler H, Leisler B (2002) The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108:249–272
Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:63–75
Møller AP (2009) Successful City dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the western Palearctic. Oecologia 159:849–858
Seferta A, Guay R-J, Marzinotto E, Lefebvre L (2001) Learning differences between feral pigeons and Zenaida doves: the role of neophobia and human proximity. Ethology 107:281–293
Slabbekoorn H, Den Boer-Visser A (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Curr Biol 16:2326–2331
Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5460–5465
Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L (2008) Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am Nat 172:S63–S71
Sol D, Lefebvre L (2000) Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90:599–605
Soldatini C, Mainardi D, Baldaccini NE, Giunchi D (2006) A temporal analysis of the foraging flights of feral pigeons (f.) from three Italian cities. Ital J Zool 73(1):83–92
Stephen S, Ditchkoff S, Saalfeld T, Gibson CJ (2006) Animal behaviour in urban ecosystems: modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst 9:5–12
Tear TH, Ables ED (1999) Social system development and variability in a reintroduced Arabian oryx population. Biological Conservation 89 (2):199-207
Ward P, Zahavi A (1973) The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information-centres” for foodfinding. Ibis 115: 517–534. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1973.tb01990.x
Webster SJ, Lefebvre L (2001) Problem solving and neophobia in a Columbiform–Passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Anim Behav 62:23–32
Wright TF, Eberhard JR, Hobson EA, Avery ML, Russello MA (2010) Behavioural flexibility and species invasions: the adaptive flexibility hypothesis. Ethol Ecol Evol 22:393–404
Acknowledgements
We would like to express a special thanks to all people that helped in the study: Fabio Chini, Samuel Perret, David Otamendi and the Cité Universitaire Internationale de Paris, CSME colombophilie of Epinay sur Seine and Guy Lemoine, Ahmad Ismail, Ahmed Belguermi, Michel Saint Jalme, Iry Andrianjara, Diane Gonzalez and the city of Paris for delivering bird feeding authorization. We deeply thank Meredith Root-Bernstein for editing the language of the manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and an associate editor for their comprehensive comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skandrani, Z., Bovet, D., Gasparini, J. et al. Sociality enhances birds’ capacity to deal with anthropogenic ecosystems. Urban Ecosyst 20, 609–615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0618-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0618-1