Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of small urban parks characteristics on bird diversity: A case study of Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The capacity of small urban park to serve as urban habitats are rarely explored. This study analyses the characteristics of small urban parks and their potential to support urban biodiversity and ecological functions. Nine small urban parks were studied in Malaysia in August and September 2014 using the combined field survey method of structured observation and field measurements. The measured variables were divided into three broad categories of physical characteristics, species richness and human factors. Bird species richness and abundance were used as the indicators for assessing biodiversity. Pearson correlations and multiple regressions were conducted to analyse the relationships between variables and to identify which variables had a significant effect on bird species richness and abundance. The results demonstrated that park area and vegetation variables ( e.g. the percentage of tree canopy cover, open grass/ground, native-exotic plants) are the important predictors of bird species richness and abundance. The percentage of canopy covers (negative relation) and park area (positive relation) are the best predictors of bird species richness in small urban parks. Meanwhile, the best predictors for bird abundance are the percentage of canopy covers (negative relation) and native vegetation species (positive relation). Human activities and park surroundings have a marginal effect on the presence of bird species in small parks. Based on the findings, we provide two general recommendations that could probably increase bird diversity in small urban parks: (1) the park development and management plan should incorporate a social-ecological approach that can benefit both city-dwellers and bird species, and (2) findings from the study should be used to rethink the planting design and composition of especially newly established small urban parks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnberger A, Haider W, Brandenburg C (2005) Evaluating visitor-monitoring techniques: a comparison of counting and video observation data. Environ Manag 36(2):317–327. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-8201-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T (2013) Principles of Ecological Landscape Design. Island Press. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MO (2011) ‘Passerine reactions to human behaviour and vegetation structure in Peterborough, Canada’,. Urban For Urban Green 10(1):47–51 Available at: WOS:000289024300007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbó-Ramírez P, Zuria I (2011) The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landsc Urban Plan 100(3):213–222. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik, A. (2012) ‘The landscape of Kocaeli pedestrian walkway as an example of urban outdoor and user views’, J Food Agric Environ, 10(April). Available at: http://world-food.net/download/journals/2012-issue_2/237.pdf (Accessed: 19 January 2015).

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landsc Urban Plan 74(1):46–69. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DE, Gough S, Vaughan H, Vickery JA, Appleton GF (2007) Determinants of bird species richness in public green spaces: Capsule Bird species richness showed consistent positive correlations with site area and rough grass. Bird Study 54(1):87–97. doi:10.1080/00063650709461460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Marzluff JM (2011) ‘Coupled Relationships between Humans and other Organisms in Urban Areas’. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen G, James P, Mclntyre NE (eds) Urban Ecology: Patterns, processess, and applications. Oxford University Press, pp. 135–147

  • Collinge SK (1996) Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landsc Urban Plan 36(1):59–77. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00341-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis J, Hermy M (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc Urban Plan 69(4):385–401. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison GWH, Aik YC (2010) A Naturalist’s Guide to the Birds of Malaysia including Sabah and Sarawak. John Beaufoy Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenc M, Sedláček O, Fuchs R (2014) How to improve urban greenspace for woodland birds: site and local-scale determinants of bird species richness. Urban Ecosystems 17(2):625–640. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0328-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2001) Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: implications for park design. Environ Conserv 28(03):263–269. doi:10.1017/S0376892901000273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana S, Sattler T, Bontadina F, Moretti M (2011) ‘How to manage the urban green to improve bird diversity and community structure’. Landscape Urban Plan Elsevier BV 101(3):278–285. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.033

  • Forman RTT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landsc Ecol 10(3):133–142. doi:10.1007/BF00133027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A, Musacchio LR (2005) Designing Small Parks: A Manual for Addressing Social and Ecological Concerns. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RA, Chadwick MA (2013) Urban Ecosystems: Understanding the Human Environment, 1st edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hails CJ, Kavanagh M (2013) ‘Bring back the birds! Planning for trees and other plants to support southeast Asian wildlife in urban areas’. Raffles Bull Zool (SUPPL. 29):243–258

  • Henshaw V (2014) Urban Smellscapes: Understanding and designing city smell environment. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M, Knowles H (2009) Conservation Subdivision : Design Phase – Patch Size and Shape of Conserved Open Spaces, UF/IFAS Extension. Florida

  • Ikin K, Beaty RM, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD (2013) ‘Pocket parks in a compact city: how do birds respond to increasing residential density?’,. Landsc Ecol 28(1):45–56 Available at: WOS:000313833100004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai H, Nakashizuka T (2010) Environmental factors affecting the composition and diversity of avian community in mid- to late breeding season in urban parks and green spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 96(3):183–194. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Payne SR, Fuller RA, Painter B, Gaston KJ (2009) Green space, soundscape and urban sustainability: an interdisciplinary, empirical study. Local Environ 14(2):155–172. doi:10.1080/13549830802522061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H, Liu S, Sun P, An S, Zhou G, Li C, Wang J, Yu H, Tian X (2014) The influence of vegetation type on the hydrological process at the landscape scale. Can J Remote Sens 30(5):743–763. doi:10.5589/m04-033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki, J. (1999) ‘Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scale variables’, Urban Ecosystems, (1966), pp. 21–34. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009505418327 (Accessed: 19 January 2015).

  • Ju SR, Zaki SA, Choi YK (2011) Contextual Modernization; New Town Planning in Petaling Jaya, of Malaysia. J Asian Architec Build Eng 10(1):93–100. doi:10.3130/jaabe.10.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec T, Tropek R, Konvicka M (2012) Timed surveys and transect walks as comparable methods for monitoring butterflies in small plots. J Insect Conserv 16(2):275–280. doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9414-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang W, Minor ES, Park C, Lee D (2015) ‘Effects of habitat structure , human disturbance , and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities’,. Urban Ecosystems. doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0433-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Karuppannan S, Baharuddin ZM, Sivam A, Daniels CB (2014) ‘Urban Green Space and Urban Biodiversity : Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia’. Sustain Dev 7(1):1–16. doi:10.5539/jsd.v7n1p1

    Google Scholar 

  • Khera N, Mehta V, Sabata BC (2009) ‘Interrelationship of birds and habitat features in urban greenspaces in Delhi, India’,. Urban Forestry Urban Greening Elsevier 8(3):187–196. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.001

  • Kim J, Chae J, Koo T, Im JK, Hae JC, Oo TK (2007) ‘Variation in Bird Diversity in Relation to Habitat Size in the Urban Landscape of Seoul , South Korea’,. Acta Ornithologica 42(1):39–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Menlo Park, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerling M, Muller N (2012) ‘The relationship between landscape design style and the conservation value of parks: A case study of a historical park in Weimar, Germany’,. Landsc Urban Plan 107(2):111–117 Available at: WOS:000307145300005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim HC, Sodhi NS (2004) Responses of avian guilds to urbanisation in a tropical city. Landsc Urban Plan 66(4):199–215. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00111-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim HC, Sodhi NS, Brook BW, Soh MCK (2003) Undesirable aliens: factors determining the distribution of three invasive bird species in Singapore. J Trop Ecol 19(6):685–695. doi:10.1017/S0266467403006084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe K a, Taylor CE, Major RE (2011) Do Common Mynas significantly compete with native birds in urban environments? J Ornithol 152(4):909–921. doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0674-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansor M.S., Sah S.A.M. (2012) The Influence of Habitat Structure on Bird Species Composition in Lowland Malaysian Rain Forests. Trop Life Sci Res 23, 1–14

  • McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D (2010) ‘Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research.’,. Health Place Elsevier 16(4):712–726. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003

  • Min BC, Omar-Hor K, Lin O-YC, Kheng NC (2006) 1001 Garden Plants in Singapore, 2nd edn National Parks Board

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63(1):63–75. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0636-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR (2015) Insect Conservation and Urban Environments. Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21224-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK (2014) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems 17(1):305–327. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordh H, Hartig T, Hagerhall CM, Fry G (2009) ‘Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration’,. Urban Forestry Urban Greening Elsevier 8(4):225–235. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003

  • Nordh H, Alalouch C, Hartig T (2011) ‘Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology’. Urban Forestry Urban Greening Elsevier GmbH 10(2):95–103. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003

  • Oliver AJ, Hong-Wa C, Devonshire J, Olea KR, Rivas GF, Gahl MK (2011) Avifauna richness enhanced in large, isolated urban parks. Landsc Urban Plan 102(4):215–225. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck HL, Pringle HE, Marshall HH, Owens IPF, Lord a M (2014) Experimental evidence of impacts of an invasive parakeet on foraging behavior of native birds. Behav Ecol 25(3):582–590. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peschardt KK, Stigsdotter UK, Schipperrijn J (2014) ‘Identifying Features of Pocket Parks that May Be Related to Health Promoting Use’. Landsc Res:1–16. doi:10.1080/01426397.2014.894006

  • Proppe DS, Sturdy CB, St Clair CC (2013) Anthropogenic noise decreases urban songbird diversity and may contribute to homogenization. Glob Chang Biol 19(4):1075–1084. doi:10.1111/gcb.12098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Lindberg S, Nielsen AB (2013) Is biodiversity attractive?-On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space’. Landscape and Urban Planning. Elsevier B.V 119:136–146. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007

  • Reis E, López-Iborra GM, Pinheiro RT (2012) ‘Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: Implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil’. Landscape Urban Plan Elsevier BV 107(1):31–42. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.009

  • Rousseau JS, Savard JL, Titman R (2015) Shrub-nesting birds in urban habitats : their abundance and association with vegetation. Urban Ecosystems, pp:871–884. doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0434-4

  • Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G (2006) Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 77(1–2):39–53. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savard J-PL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G (2000) ‘Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems’,. Landscape and Urban Planning Elsevier science BV, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands 48(3–4):131–142. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2

  • Schütz C, Schulze CH (2015) ‘Functional diversity of urban bird communities: effects of landscape composition, green space area and vegetation cover’. Ecol Evol:n/a–n/a. doi:10.1002/ece3.1778

  • Shanahan DF, Miller C, Possingham HP, Fuller R a (2011) The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol Conserv 144(2):722–729. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz A, Shirley S, Kark S (2008) How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landsc Urban Plan 84(3–4):219–229. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz A, Muratet A, Simon L, Julliard R (2013) Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis. Biol Conserv 157:285–292. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skandrani Z, Lepetz S, Prévot-Julliard A-C (2014) ‘Nuisance species: beyond the ecological perspective’,. Ecol Process 3(1):p. 3. doi:10.1186/2192–1709–3–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagoll K, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD (2012) Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv Lett 5(2):115–122. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00216.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS (2013) Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landsc Urban Plan 114:69–79. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman S, Mohamad NHN, Idilfitri S (2013) ‘Contribution of Vegetation in Urban Parks as Habitat for Selective Bird Community’,. Procedia – Social Behavioral Sci Elsevier BV 85:267–281. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.358

  • Szlavecz K, Warren P, Pickett S (2011) Biodiversity on the Urban Landscape. In: Cincotta RP, Gorenflo LJ (eds) Human Population:Its Influences on Biological Diversity. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 75–95. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16707-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo MCB, Donatelli RJ, Batista GT (2011) Relation between green spaces and bird community structure in an urban area in Southeast Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 15(1):111–131. doi:10.1007/s11252-011-0195-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, James P (2010) ‘Peoples’ use of, and concerns about, green space networks: A case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Elsevier 9(2):121–128. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.12.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou D, Chu LM (2012) How would size, age, human disturbance, and vegetation structure affect bird communities of urban parks in different seasons? J Ornithol 153(4):1101–1112. doi:10.1007/s10336-012-0839-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for funding and financial support. We thank Ms. Suziana Hassan for assistance in statistical analysis. We would also like to thank all of the assistants for their help in conducting the field survey in Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zanariah Jasmani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jasmani, Z., Ravn, H.P. & van den Bosch, C.C.K. The influence of small urban parks characteristics on bird diversity: A case study of Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. Urban Ecosyst 20, 227–243 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0584-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0584-7

Keywords

Navigation