Abstract
Highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (HP-PRRSV) is characterized by high fever, respiratory distress, and high mortality in pigs of all ages and has severely affected the Vietnam pork industry in recent years. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety, and overall performance of a modified live PRRSV-2 vaccine (Fostera PRRS) to an existing PRRSV modified live vaccine on a farm with a recent history of HP-PRRSV-associated respiratory diseases. A total of 351 pigs were randomly allocated to three treatment groups: (i) vaccinated with Fostera PRRS at 1 day of age (n = 118), (ii) vaccinated with Fostera PRRS (n = 118) at 21 days of age, and (iii) vaccinated with Amervac PRRS (n = 115) at 21 days of age. The Fostera PRRS vaccinated pigs had milder clinical symptoms, lower levels of HP-PRRSV viremia, fewer pathological changes in the lung, and higher body weight gain at the end of the study compared with the Amervac PRRS group. Vaccination of pigs with Fostera PRRS at 1 day of age also significantly reduced viral loads in their blood (P < 0.05) and induced higher anti-PRRSV antibody titers (P < 0.01) compared with pigs vaccinated with Amervac PRRS at 21 days of age. Fostera PRRS vaccination at 1 day of age can be useful in protecting young piglets from early HP-PRRSV infection because the immunized pigs were marketed 20 days earlier than their peers immunized at 21-day old as they reached the target market weight earlier in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charoenchanikran, P., Kedkovid, R., Sirisereewan, C., Woonwong, Y., Arunorat, J., Sitthichareonchai, P., Sopipan, N., Jittimanee, S., Kesdangsakonwut, S., Thanawongnuwech, R., 2016. Efficacy of Fostera(R) PRRS modified live virus (MLV) vaccination strategy against a Thai highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (HP-PRRSV) infection. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48:, 1351-1359.
Christensen, G., Sorensen, V., Mousing, J., 1999. Diseases of the respiratory system. In: Straw B, D’Allaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ, eds. Diseases of Swine. 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1999, 913–940.
Du, Y., Qi, J., Lu, Y., Wu, J., Yoo, D., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Li, J., Sun, W., Cong, X., Shi, J., Wang, J., 2012. Evaluation of a DNA vaccine candidate co-expressing GP3 and GP5 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) with interferon alpha/gamma in immediate and long-lasting protection against HP-PRRSV challenge. Virus Genes, 45, 474-487.
Dung, D.H., Long, N.V., Minh, P.Q., Nam, H.V., Khong, N.V., 2013. Spatial and temporal epidemiology characteristics of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Vietnam, 2007-2012. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology (in Vietnamese), XX-5, 5-14.
Duy, D.T., Park, C., Choi, K., Jeong, J., Toan, N.T., Quat, N.D., Hien, L.T., and Chae, C., 2015a. Comparison of Experimental Infection with Northern and Southern Vietnamese Strains of Highly Pathogenic Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 152, 227-237.
Duy, D.T., Park, C., Choi, K., Jeong, J., Toan, N.T., Khang, D.N., Dai, V.T., Chae, C., 2015b. Comparison of two genetically distant type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) modified live vaccines against Vietnamese highly pathogenic PRRSV. Veterinary Microbiology, 179, 233–241.
Duy, D.T., Park, C., Choi, K., Jeong, J., Toan, N.T., Dung, L.T.H., Khoa, V.M., Chae, C., 2015c. Nucleotide sequence analysis of Vietnamese highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus from 2013 to 2014 based on the NSP2 and ORF5 coding regions. Archives of Virology, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-015-2699-1.
Duy, D.T., Kim, H., Jeong, J., Park, K.H., Yang, S., Oh, T., Kim, S., Kang, I., Chae, C., 2018. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of commercial and prototype PRRS subunit vaccines against an HP-PRRSV challenge. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 80(9), 1463–1467.
Halbur, P.G., Paul, P.S., Frey, M.L., Landgraf, J., Eernisse, K., Meng, X.J., Lum, M.A., Andrews, J.J., Rathje, J.A., 1995. Comparison of the pathogenicity of two US porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates with that of the Lelystad virus. Veterinary Pathology, 32, 648e660.
Jeong, J.W., Kim, S., Park, K.H., Kang, I., Park, S.J., Yang, S.Y., Oh, T.H., Chae, C., 2018. Vaccination with a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine at 1-day-old improved growth performance of piglets under field conditions. Veterinary Microbiology, 214, 113–124.
Metwally S., Mohamed, F., Faaberg, K., Burrage, T., Prarat, M., Moran, K., Bracht, A., Mayr, G., Berninger, M., Koster, L., To T.L, Nguyen, V.L, Reising, M., Landgraf, J., Cox, L., Lubroth, J., Carrillo, C., 2010. Pathogenicity and molecular characterization of emerging porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in Vietnam in 2007. Transboundary Emerging Diseases, 57, 315-329.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD)., 2010. Swine Production in Vietnam: Current Status, Challenges and Perspectives. Technical report (Vo Trong Thanh). Department of Animal Husbandry, Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development, 2010, 1-45.
Park, C., Seo, H.W., Han, K., Kang, I., Chae, C., 2014. Evaluation of the efficacy of a new modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine (Fostera PRRS) against heterologous PRRSV challenge. Veterinary Microbiology, 172, 432–442.
Prieto, C., Alvarez, E., Martinez-Lobo, F.J., Simarro, I., Castro, J.M., 2008. Similarity of European porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strains to vaccine strain is not necessarily predictive of the degree of protective immunity conferred. Veterinary Journal, 175, 356–363.
Sirisereewan, C., Woonwong, Y., Arunorat, J., Kedkovid, R., Nedumpun, T., Kesdangsakonwut, S., Suradhat, S., Thanawongnuwech, R., Teankum, K., 2018. Efficacy of a type 2 PRRSV modified live vaccine (PrimePac PRRS) against a Thai HP-PRRSV challenge. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50(7), 1509-1518.
Zhou, Z., Ni, J., Cao, Z., Han, X., Xia, Y., Zi, Z., Ning, K., Liu, Q., Cai, L., Qiu, P., Deng, X., Hu, D., Zhang, Q., Fan, Y., Wu, J., Wang, L., Zhang, M., Yu, X., Zhai, X., Tian, K., 2011. The epidemic status and genetic diversity of 14 highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (HP-PRRSV) isolates from China in 2009. Veterinary Microbiology, 150, 257-269.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Zoetis through contract research funds (Study Protocol # 17INTORPORKBIO07). The authors would like to thank Zoetis Vietnamese personnel and personnel who are working on a swine farm and supported the study. The study was also carried out over 6 months long by a few students of the Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Nong Lam University, Thu Duc district, Hochiminh City, Vietnam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived or designed study: Duy Tien Do, Toan Tat Nguyen, Chanhee Chae, ChoewKong Mah
Performed research: Nam Thi Thu Nguyen, Ninh Thi Phuoc Nguyen, Hien Thanh Le, Mai Ha Phuong Nguyen
Analyzed data: Mai Ha Phuong Nguyen, Hien Thanh Le, Duy Tien Do
Contributed new methods or models: Duy Tien Do, Chanhee Chae
Wrote the paper: Duy Tien Do, Chanhee Chae, ChoewKong Mah
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statement of animal rights
All methods and animal studies were conducted under the approval of Nonglam University Animal Ethics Committee (AEC), Nonglam University, Vietnam (NLU-190702).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Do, D.T., Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, N.T.H. et al. The efficacy and performance impact of Fostera PRRS in a Vietnamese commercial pig farm naturally challenged by a highly pathogenic PRRS virus. Trop Anim Health Prod 52, 1725–1732 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02177-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02177-6