Abstract
In this article, our focus is on the topic of engagement and possibility of empathy with future generations. We acknowledge that empathy for future generations is practically unattainable in its strictest sense due to the lack of access to their potential mental states and the absence of direct interaction. Additionally, we will draw upon the arguments presented by Goldie and Slaby to address concerns regarding the potential paternalization that may arise in empathic relations towards future generations. However, despite these limitations, it is important to emphasize that we are still engaged with future generations. Instead of adopting a paternalizing approach where we impose expectations on how they should feel, our engagement exposes us to the anticipated but unknown judgments of future generations. Throughout this article, we will argue that engagement with future generations brings out our own social self-consciousness and provides a basis of our connectedness and responsibility towards future generations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As Szanto argues, there is certainly a difference between Stein’s account and those who argue that collective emotions are constituted by normativity, such as the argument provided by Gilbert (2014). For Gilbert, the emergence of collective emotions is due to normativity or joint commitments between the parties. For Stein, emotional sharing is already at play at a more basic, non-normative level of affectivity (Szanto 2015: 518).
Nevertheless, one could argue for intergenerational reciprocity, particularly if we include relations with past generations (see Fritsch 2018: 91ff).
References
Andina T (2022) A philosophy for future generations. The structure and Dynamics of Transgenerationality. Bloomsbury, London
Bernet R (1998) My time and Time of the Other. In: Zahavi D (ed) Self-Awareness, temporality and alterity. Springer, Cham, pp 137–149
Butler J (2001) Giving an Account of Oneself. Diacritics 31(4):22–40
Churchland PM (1998) Folk psychology. Churchland Paul & Patricia Churchland (eds), on the contrary: critical essays 1987–1997. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–15. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5123.001.0001
Fritsch M (2018) Taking turns with the Earth. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Gallagher S (2008) Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Conscious Cogn 17:535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003
Gilbert M (2014) How we feel: understanding everyday collective emotion ascription. In: von Scheve C, Salmela M (eds) Collective emotions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659180.003.0002
Goldie P (2011) Anti-empathy. In: Coplan A, Goldie P (eds) Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0018
Goldman A (2006) Simulating minds: the philosophy, psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Husserl E (1973) Zur Phänomenologie Der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlas. Martinus Nijhoff, Haag
Montes Sanchez A (2015) Shame and the Internalized Other. Ethics & Politics 17(2):180–199
Sartre J-P (1978) Being and nothingness. Pocket Books, New York
Schilbach L et al (2013) Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav Brain Sci 36:393–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12000660
Seneca LA (2015) Letters on Ethics. To Lucilius. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226265209.001.0001
Slaby J (2014) Empathy’s Blind Spot. Med Healthc Philos 17(2):249–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9543-3
Stein E (1922) Beitäge Zur Philosophischen Begründung Der Psychologie Und Der Geisteswissenschaften. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 5:1–283
Szanto T (2015) Collective emotions, Normativity, and Empathy: a Steinian Account. Hum Stud 38(4):503–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9350-8
Szanto T (2018) The Phenomenology of Shared emotions—reassessing Gerda Walther. In: Luft S, Hagenbruger R (eds) Women phenomenologists on Social Ontology. We-experiences, Communal Life, and Joint Action. Springer, Cham
Zahavi D (2001) Beyond empathy: phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. J Conscious Stud 8(5–7):151–167
Zahavi D (2014a) Empathy and Other-Directed intentionality. Topoi 33:129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9197-4
Zahavi D (2014b) Self and other. Exploring subjectivity, Empathy, and shame. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zahavi D (2015) You, me, and we: the sharing of emotional experiences. J Conscious Stud 22(1–2):84–101
Zahavi D (2019) Second-Person Engagement, Self-Alienation, and Group-Identification. Topoi 38:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9444-6
Zahavi D (2021) We in me or me in we? Collective intentionality and selfhood. J Social Ontology 7(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0076
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article was realised with the support of the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, according to the Agreement on the realisation and financing of scientific research.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cvejić, I., Plećaš, T. & Bojanić, P. Engagement with Future Generations: Unfulfilled Empathy. Topoi 43, 49–54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10009-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10009-y