Skip to main content
Log in

Wisdom, Virtues, and Well-Being: An Empirical Test of Aristotle’s Theory of Flourishing

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to Aristotle, wisdom orchestrates all other virtues and therefore leads to eudaimonia, which can be translated as flourishing or psychological well-being. Wisdom guides people to take the morally right course of action in concrete situations to benefit themselves and others. If Aristotle’s theory is correct, then wisdom should be related to different moral virtues and wisdom, rather than individual virtues, should predict eudaimonic well-being, establishing wisdom as the driving force behind human flourishing. Survey data were collected from 230 undergraduate students (M = 21 years, median age = 20 years) attending five different classes in the social sciences at a university in the Southeast of the United States at the beginning and end of the fall semester in 2016. Bivariate correlations, regression analyses, and a structural equation model were utilized to analyze the data. Three-dimensional wisdom (3D-WS) at the beginning of the semester (T1), consisting of the average of cognitive, reflective, and compassionate personality qualities, was significantly positively related to gratitude, forgiveness, morality/fairness, modesty, greed avoidance, and sincerity at T1. Wisdom at T1 predicted flourishing at the end of the semester (T2), assessed by self-acceptance, mastery, purpose in life, and orientation toward personal growth. Among the virtues, only gratitude at T1 significantly predicted flourishing at T2. It appears that Aristotle was correct! Wisdom, at least as measured by the 3D-WS, seems to orchestrate moral virtues and result in human flourishing. This implies that cultivating the development of wisdom will lead to a better and more flourishing life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The 4-item altruism subscale (e.g., I try to give generously to those in need) was excluded from the analyses because Cronbach’s alpha was unsatisfactory (0.44 at T1).

  2. Age (in years) was unrelated to any of the outcome variables in the bivariate and multivariate analyses.

  3. The bivariate test–retest correlation of wisdom was 0.80 (p < .001).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Ardelt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

The data collection for this study received ethics approval as exempt (IRB 201601395) by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ardelt, M., Kingsbury, J. Wisdom, Virtues, and Well-Being: An Empirical Test of Aristotle’s Theory of Flourishing. Topoi (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-10002-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-10002-x

Keywords

Navigation