Skip to main content
Log in

Social Media Experiences of LGBTQ+ People: Enabling Feelings of Belonging

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ+) people are experiencing increasingly varied visibility on social media due to ongoing digitalization. In this paper, I draw on social epistemology and phenomenological accounts of the digital (Frost-Arnold in: Lackey (ed) The epistemic dangers of context collapse online, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2021; Krueger and Osler in Philos Topics 47(2):205–231, 2019; Hine in: Ethnography for the internet: embedded, embodied and everyday, Bloomsbury, London, 2015), and argue that, for LGBTQ+ individuals, social media provides a space for connecting with people with shared lived experiences. This, in turn, makes it possible for social media to enable feelings of belonging. By interacting with other LGBTQ+ people online, LGBTQ+ individuals are enabled to imagine their own being in the world and to feel like they belong. This is especially important when we consider that, for LGBTQ+ identities, it may be more complicated to feel connected due to marginalization and (fear of) discrimination. This paper not only draws on literature from phenomenology and social epistemology on the digital, but also presents and analyzes interviews that were conducted in order to explore the social media experiences of LGBTQ+ people through a phenomenology and social epistemology informed framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Name and name of avatar changed to preserve anonymity.

  2. I take phenomenological approaches to be “a philosophical investigation of experience, subjectivity, and the lifeworld” (Køster and Fernandez 2021). This will be explored further in the methods section.

  3. Social media, here, means all kinds of different social networking sites that allow for creating a profile, connecting to other users, and dynamic conversation (Shapiro 2010).

Abbreviations

LGBTQ+ :

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer,+ (and further sexual or gender minorities)

BIPoC:

Black, indigenous, people of color

FTM:

Female to male (outdated term to describe trans masculine experiences)

References

  • Ahmed S (2004) Collective Feelings. Or, the impressions left by others. Theory Cult Soc 21(2):25–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barr SM, Budge SL, Adelson JL (2016) Transgender community belongingness as a mediator between strength of transgender identity and well-being. J Couns Psychol 63(1):87–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister R, Leary M (1995) The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 117(3):497–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berenstain N (2016) Epistemic exploitation. Ergo 3:569–90

  • Cannon Y, Speedlin S, Avera J, Robertson D, Ingram M, Prado A (2017) Transition connection, disconnection, and social media: examining the digital lived experiences of transgender individuals. J LGBT Issues Couns 11(2):68–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2017.1310006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante A (2016) “I Did It All Online:” transgender identity and the management of everyday life. Crit Stud Media Commun 33(1):109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1129065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (2005) Grounded theory in the 21st century: a qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, pp 507–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications

  • Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory. 2nd Edition. Sage.

  • Clarke AE (2019) Situating grounded theory and situational analysis in interpretive qualitative inquiry. In: A Bryant & K Charmaz (eds), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 3–47)

  • Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotson T (2017). Technically Together: Reconstructing Community in a Networked World. MIT Press.

  • Eickers G (2023) Influencing corporealities: social media and its impact on gender transition. In M Edwards and O Palermos (eds), feminist philosophy and emerging technologies, Routledge, 227–247

  • Fricker M (2007) Epistemic Injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frost-Arnold K (2021) The Epistemic Dangers of Context Collapse Online. In: Jennifer Lackey (ed) Applied Epistemology, Oxford University Press, 437–456.

  • Georgiou M (2013) Diaspora in the digital era: Minorities and media representation. JEMIE: Journal on ethnopolitics and minority issues in Europe, 12(4): S. 80-99

  • Gunn H, Lynch MP (2021) The internet and epistemic agency. In: Lackey J (ed) Applied epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 389–409

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haimson OL (2018) Social media as social transition machinery. ACM Hum-Comput Interact Proc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimson OL (2021) Online Communities. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Trans Studies. SAGE Publications, Inc.

  • Haimson OL, Dame-Griff A, Capello E, Richter Z (2021) Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Fem Media Stud 21(3):345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1678505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halse C (2018) Theories and theorising of belonging. In: Halse C (ed) Interrogating belonging for young people in schools. Palgrave, London, pp 1–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (1991) Whose science/whose knowledge? Open University Press, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (1992) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is strong objectivity. Centennial Rev 36:437–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine C (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury.

  • Høffding S, Martiny KM (2016) Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 15:539–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar A (2004) Globalizing Feminist Ethics. In: Calhoun C (ed) Setting the moral compass: essays by women philosophers. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy B, Sims SL, Stern PN (1996) Grounded theory as feminist research methodology. J Adv Nurs 1996(23):448–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Køster A, Fernandez AV (2021) Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to phenomenologically grounded qualitative research. Phenomenology & The Cognitive Sciences.

  • Krueger J, Osler L (2019) Engineering affect: emotion regulation, the internet, and the techno-social niche. Philos Top 47(2):205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukla, Quill (published as R) (2006) Objectivity and Perspective in Empirical Knowledge. Episteme 3(1): 80-95.

  • McInroy LB, Craig SL (2015) Transgender representation in offline and online media: LGBTQ youth perspectives. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 25(6):606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra B, Merkel C, Bishop AP (2004) The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media Soc 6(6):781–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler L (2019) Feeling togetherness online: a phenomenological sketch of online communal experiences. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 19:569–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler L (2021) Taking empathy online. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1899045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn S (2023) Integrating qualitative research methodologies and phenomenology—Using dancers’ and athletes’ experiences for phenomenological analysis. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 22(1):107–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro E (2010) Gender circuits: bodies and identities in a technological age. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szanto T, Moran D (2015) The phenomenology of sociality: discovering the ‘we,’ vol 3. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie A (2003) Why standpoint matters. In: Robert Figueira and Sandra G Harding (eds), science and other cultures: issues in philosophies of science and technology. Routledge, 26–48

  • Zahavi D (2001) Beyond empathy. Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. J Conscious Stud 8(5–6):151–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GE designed and conceptualized the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by GE, with occasional help of two student assistants, Thale Reitz and Michelle Tannrath. The manuscript was written by GE.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gen Eickers.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

No ethics approval was required for this study at the University of Education Ludwigsburg, Germany. The study was performed in line with the principles of research ethics in Germany and the University of Education Ludwigsburg, Germany.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eickers, G. Social Media Experiences of LGBTQ+ People: Enabling Feelings of Belonging. Topoi (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09994-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09994-3

Keywords

Navigation