Skip to main content
Log in

Thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with COVID-19 develop an increased risk of thromboembolism. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the role of thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19 is less well defined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis among outpatients with COVID-19. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 2023. The outcomes of interest were venous thromboembolic events including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, hospitalization, major bleeding events, and non-major bleeding events. We included 6 trials comprising 3352 patients. Patients who received thromboprophylaxis had an approximately 70% reduction in venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.08 to 0.93]) compared to patients who did not receive thromboprophylaxis. The risk of mortality (RR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.77]), cardiovascular events (RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.30 to 2.73]), and hospitalization (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.47]) were similar between the two groups. Patients who received thromboprophylaxis had a higher risk of non-major bleeding (RR, 3.48 [95% CI, 1.72 to 7.05) compared to patients who did not receive thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism but not mortality, cardiovascular events, or hospitalization among outpatients with COVID-19.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or its supplementary materials. The template data collection forms and data used for all analyses including the analytic code can be obtained upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Giannis D, Barish MA, Goldin M, Cohen SL, Kohn N, Gianos E et al (2021) Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Mortality in Patients with Initial Presentation of COVID-19. J Thromb Thrombolysis 51(4):897–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02413-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Potpara T, Angiolillo DJ, Bikdeli B, Capodanno D, Cole O, Yataco AC, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy in Arterial Thrombosis and Thromboembolism in COVID-19: An American College of Chest Physicians Expert Panel Report. CHEST

  3. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, Schulman S (2015) Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 13(11):2119–2126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Connors JM, Brooks MM, Sciurba FC, Krishnan JA, Bledsoe JR, Kindzelski A et al (2021) Effect of Antithrombotic Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Outpatients With Clinically Stable Symptomatic COVID-19: The ACTIV-4B Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 326(17):1703–1712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piazza G, Spyropoulos AC, Hsia J, Goldin M, Towner WJ, Go AS et al (2023) Rivaroxaban for Prevention of Thrombotic Events, Hospitalization, and Death in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation 147(25):1891–1901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Voci D, Götschi A, Held U, Bingisser R, Colucci G, Duerschmied D et al (2023) Enoxaparin for outpatients with COVID-19: 90-day results from the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multinational, phase III OVID trial. Thromb Res 221:157–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ananworanich J, Mogg R, Dunne MW, Bassyouni M, David CV, Gonzalez E et al (2022) Randomized Study of Rivaroxaban vs Placebo on Disease Progression and Symptoms Resolution in High-Risk Adults With Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 75(1):e473–e481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cools F, Virdone S, Sawhney J, Lopes RD, Jacobson B, Arcelus JI et al (2022) Thromboprophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard of care in unvaccinated, at-risk outpatients with COVID-19 (ETHIC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Haematol 9(8):e594–e604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Avezum Á, Oliveira Junior HA, Neves PDMM et al (2023) Rivaroxaban to prevent major clinical outcomes in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: the CARE - COALITION VIII randomised clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine 60:102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102004

  11. Fang MC, Reynolds K, Tabada GH, Prasad PA, Sung SH, Parks AL et al (2023) Assessment of the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Nonhospitalized Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Network Open 6(3):e232338-e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. Available at https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed 28 Feb 2024

  13. Singh S, Tantry U, Bliden K, Garg A, Gurbel P (2023) Abstract 14420: Role of Thromboprophylaxis in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circulation. 148(Suppl_1):A14420-A

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Ping Hsia.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval statement

There are no human subjects in this article and informed consent is not applicable.

Conflict of interest

No financial or personal conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

• The role of thromboprophylaxis among COVID-19 outpatients is unclear.

• We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis among COVID-19 outpatients.

• Thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism but not mortality, cardiovascular events, or hospitalization.

• Thromboprophylaxis increases the risk of non-major bleeding.

• The risk of non-major bleeding appears to be higher in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 520 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiang, CH., Ahmed, O., Liu, W. et al. Thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02966-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02966-3

Keywords

Navigation