Skip to main content
Log in

Individuation of objects – a problem for structuralism?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This paper identifies two aspects of the structuralist position of S. Shapiro which are in conflict with the actual practice of mathematics. The first problem follows from Shapiro’s identification of isomorphic structures. Here I consider the so called K-group, as defined by A. Grothendieck in algebraic geometry, and a group which is isomorphic to the K-group, and I argue that these are not equal. The second problem concerns Shapiro’s claim that it is not possible to identify objects in a structure except through the relations and functions that are defined on the structure in which the object has a place. I argue that, in the case of the definition of the so called direct image of a function, it is possible to individuate objects in structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Awodey (1996) ArticleTitle‘Structure in Mathematics and Logic: A Categorical Perspective’ Philos. Math 4 209–237

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Benacerraf (1965) ArticleTitle‘What Numbers Could Not Be’ Philosophical Review 74 47–73

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Borel J. P. Serre (1958) ArticleTitle‘Le Theoreme de Riemann-Roch’ Bull. Soc. Math. France 86 97–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.: 2002, Ontology and Mathematical Practice, Ph.D-thesis, University of Southern Denmark.

  • D. Corfield (1998) ArticleTitle‘Beyond the Methodology of Mathematics Research Programmes’ Philos. Math 6 272–301

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dedekind (1996) ‘Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen’ W. B. Ewald (Eds) From Kant to Hilbert. A Sourcebook in the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford University Press New York 787–833

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Grosholz H. Breger (Eds) (2000) The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Grothendieck, A.: 1956/1957, ‘Sur les faisceaux algébriques et les faisceaux analytiques cohéherents’, Séminaire H. Cartan, E.N.S..

  • G. Hellman (2001) ArticleTitle‘Three Varieties of Mathematical Structuralism’ Philos. Math 9 184–211

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Keránen (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism’ Philos. Math 9 308–330

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kodaira D. C. Spencer (1953) ArticleTitle‘On Arithmetic Genera of Algebraic Varieties’ Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 39 641–649

    Google Scholar 

  • F.W. Lawvere (1966) ‘The Category of Categories as a Foundation of Mathematics’ Proc. of the Conference on Categorical Algebra (La Jolla 1965) Springer Verlag New York 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mac Lane (1996) ArticleTitle‘Structure in Mathematics’ Philos. Math 4 174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • C. McLarty (1993) ArticleTitle‘Numbers Can be Just What They Have To’ Nous 27 487–498 Occurrence HandleMR1262549

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • P. Maddy (1997) Naturalism in Mathematics Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Parsons (1990) ‘The Structuralist View of Mathematical Objects’ W. D. Hart (Eds) The Philosophy of Mathematics Oxford University Press Oxford 272–309

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Resnik (1997) Mathematics as a Science of Patterns Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Shapiro (1997) Philosophy of Mathematics. Structure and Ontology Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S.: forthcoming, ‘Structure and Identity’, to appear in F. Mac Bride and C. Wright (eds), Identity and Modality: New Essays in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford University Press.

  • G. Weaver (1998) ArticleTitle‘Structuralism and Representation Theorems’ Philos. Math 6 257–271

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, J. Individuation of objects – a problem for structuralism?. Synthese 143, 291–307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0848-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0848-x

Keywords

Navigation