Skip to main content
Log in

Natural Deduction Calculi and Sequent Calculi for Counterfactual Logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present labelled sequent calculi and labelled natural deduction calculi for the counterfactual logics CK + {ID, MP}. As for the sequent calculi we prove, in a semantic manner, that the cut-rule is admissible. As for the natural deduction calculi we prove, in a purely syntactic way, the normalization theorem. Finally, we demonstrate that both calculi are sound and complete with respect to Nute semantics [12] and that the natural deduction calculi can be effectively transformed into the sequent calculi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alenda R., Olivetti N., Pozzato G.L.: Nested sequent calculi for normal conditional logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 8, 1–48 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artosi, A., G. Governatori, and A. Rotolo, Labelled tableaux for non-monotonic reasoning: Cumulative consequence relations, Journal of Logic and Computation 12:1027–1060, 2002.

  3. Brünnler, K., Deep sequent systems for modal logic, in G. Governatori, I. Hodkinson, and Y. Venema (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 6, College Publications, London, 2006, pp. 107–119.

  4. Chellas F.B.: Conditional logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 133–153 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crocco, G., and P. Lamarre, On the connection between non-monotonic inference systems and conditional logics, in B. Nebel and E. Sandewall (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference KRÕ92, 1992, pp. 565–571.

  6. de Swart, H. C. M., A Gentzen- or Beth- type system, a practical decision procedure and a constructive completeness proof for the counterfactual logics VC and VCS, Journal of Symbolic Logic 48:1–20, 1983.

  7. Hill, B., Fiction, counterfactuals: the challenge for logic, in S. Rahman and O. Pombo (eds.), Unity of Science. Vol. II: Special Sciences, Springer, 2012, pp. 277–299.

  8. Hitchcock C.: The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs. Journal of Philosophy 98, 273–299 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Indrzejczak A.: Natural Deduction, Hybrid Systems and Modal Logic. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis D.: Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Basil (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nute, D., and C. B. Cross, Conditional logic, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 1–99.

  12. Nute J.J.: Topics in Conditional Logics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Olivetti, N., and G. L. Pozzato, A standard internal calculus for Lewis’ counterfactual logics, Tableaux 2015, 2015, pp. 270–286.

  14. Olivetti, N., G. L. Pozzato, and C. B. Schwind, A sequent calculus and a theorem prover for standard conditional logics, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 8:40–87, 2007.

  15. Pattinson, J., and L. Schroder, Generic modal cut elimination applied to conditional logics, Logical Methods in Computer Science 7:1–28, 2011.

  16. Poggiolesi, F., The method of tree-hypersequents for modal propositional logic, in D. Makinson, J. Malinowski, and H. Wansing (eds.), Trends in Logic: Towards Mathematical Philsophy, Springer, 2009, pp. 31–51.

  17. Poggiolesi, F., Gentzen Calculi for Modal Propositional Logics, Springer, Dordrecht, 2010.

  18. Prawitz, D., Natural Deduction, A Proof Theoretical Study, Almqvist and Wiskell, Uppsala, 1965.

  19. Restall, G., Proofnets for S5: sequents and circuits for modal logic, in C. Dimitracopoulos, L. Newelski, and D. Normann (eds.), Logic Colloquium 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. 151–172.

  20. Stalnaker, R., A theory of conditionals, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, 1968, pp. 98–112.

  21. Thomason R.H.: A fitch-style formulation of conditional logic. Logique et Analyse 13, 397–412 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Troelestra A., Schwichtenberg H.: Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Poggiolesi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poggiolesi, F. Natural Deduction Calculi and Sequent Calculi for Counterfactual Logics. Stud Logica 104, 1003–1036 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-016-9662-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-016-9662-3

Keywords

Navigation