Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proof-Theoretic Functional Completeness for the Hybrid Logics of Everywhere and Elsewhere

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hybrid logic is obtained by adding to an ordinary modal logic further expressive power in the form of a second sort of propositional symbols called nominals and by adding so-called satisfaction operators. In this paper we consider hybridized versions of S5 (“the logic of everywhere”) and the modal logic of inequality (“the logic of elsewhere”). We give natural deduction systems for the logics and we prove functional completeness results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Areces, C., Logic Engineering. The Case of Description and Hybrid Logics, PhD thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 2000.

  2. Areces, C., P. Blackburn, and M. Marx, ‘Hybrid logics: Characterization, interpolation and complexity’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 66:977–1010, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburn, P., ‘Internalizing labelled deduction’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 10:137–168, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, P., M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema, Modal Logic, volume 53 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

  5. Blackburn, P., and M. Tzakova, ‘Hybridizing concept languages’, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 24:23–49, 1998.

  6. Braüner, T., ‘A cut-free Gentzen formulation of the modal logic S5’, Logic Journal of the IGPL, 8:629–643, 2000. Full version of paper in Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Logic, Language, Information and Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Braüner, T., ‘Modal logic, truth, and the master modality’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 31:359–386, 2002. Revised and extended version of paper in Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 3, World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braüner, T., ‘Functional completeness for a natural deduction formulation of hybridized S5’, in P. Balbiani, N.-Y. Suzuki, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev, (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 4, King's College Publications, 2003, pp. 31–49.

  9. Braüner, T., ‘Natural deduction for hybrid logic’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 14:329–353, 2004. Revised and extended version of paper in Workshop Proceedings of Methods for Modalities 2.

  10. Braüner, T., ‘Two natural deduction systems for hybrid logic: A comparison’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 13:1–23, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Braüner, T., ‘Natural deduction for first-order hybrid logic’, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 14:173–198, 2005. Revised and extended version of paper in Workshop Proceedings of Fourth Workshop on Hybrid Logics.

  12. Braüner, T., and V. de Paiva, ‘Intuitionistic hybrid logic’, Journal of Applied Logic, 2005. To appear. Revised and extended version of paper in Workshop Proceedings of Methods for Modalities 3.

  13. de Rijke, M., ‘The modal logic of inequality’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 57:566–584, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Demri, S., ‘A simple tableau system for the logic of elsewhere’, in P. Miglioli, U. Moscato, D. Mundici, and M. Ornaghi, (eds.), Proceedings of Fifth International Workshop on Theorem Proving with Analytical Tableaux and Related Methods, volume 1071 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 177–192.

  15. Demri, S. and R. Goré, ‘Display calculi for nominal tense logics’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 12:993–1016, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitting, M., Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logic, Reidel, 1983.

  17. Fitting, M., ‘Basic modal logic’, in D. Gabbay et al., (ed.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, volume 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 365–448.

  18. Gabbay, D., Labelled Deductive Systems, Oxford University Press, 1996.

  19. Gargov, G. and V. Goranko, ‘Modal logic with names’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22:607–636, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gentzen, G. ‘Investigations into logical deduction’, in M.E. Szabo, (eds.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1969, pp. 68–131. Proof-Theoretic Functional Completeness. 225

  21. Goranko, V., and S. Passy, ‘Using the universal modality: Gains and questions’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 2:5–30, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hasle, P., P. Øhrstrøm, T. Braüner, and J. Copeland, (eds.), Revised and Expanded Edition of Arthur N. Prior: Papers on Time and Tense, Oxford University Press, 2003. 342 pages.

  23. McCullough, D.P., ‘Logical connectives for intuitionistic propositional logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 36:15–20, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mints, G., A Short Introduction to Modal Logic, CSLI Publications, 1992.

  25. Ohnishi, M., and K. Matsumoto, M., ‘Gentzen method in modal calculi’, Osaka Mathematical Journal, 9:113–130, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ohnishi, M., and K. Matsumoto, ‘Gentzen method in modal calculi, II’, Osaka Mathematical Journal, 11:115–120, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Øhrstrøm, P., and P. Hasle, ‘A. N. Prior's rediscovery of tense logic’, Erkenntnis, 39:23–50, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prawitz, D., Natural Deduction. A Proof-Theoretical Study, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prawitz, D., ‘Ideas and results in proof theory’, in J. E. Fenstad, (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, volume 63 of Studies in Logic and The Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, 1971, pp. 235–307.

  30. Prawitz, D., ‘Proofs and the meaning and completeness of the logical constants’, in J. Hintikka et al., (ed.), Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, Studies in Logic and The Foundations of Mathematics, Reidel, 1978, pp. 25–40.

  31. Prior, A., Past, Present and Future, Clarendon/Oxford University Press, 1967.

  32. Prior, A., Papers on Time and Tense, Clarendon/Oxford University Press, 1968.

  33. Segerberg, K., ‘A note on the logic of elsewhere’, Theoria, 46:183–187, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Seligman, J., ‘The logic of correct description’, in M. de Rijke, (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic, Applied Logic Series, Kluwer, 1997, pp. 107 – 135.

  35. Simpson, A., The Proof Theory and Semantics of Intuitionistic Modal logic, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1994.

  36. Tarski, A., ‘What are logical notions?' History and Philosophy of Logic, 7:143–154, 1986. Edited by J. Corcoran.

  37. Troelstra, A. S., and H. Schwichtenberg, Basic Proof Theory, vol. 43 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

  38. van der Hoek, W., and M. de Rijke, ‘Counting objects’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 5:325–345, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Venema, Y. ‘Derivation rules as anti-axioms in modal logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58:1003–1034, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. von Kutschera, F., ‘Die Vollständigkeit des Operatorsystems {¬∧∨⊃}, für die intuitionistische Aussagenlogik im Rahmen der Gentzensemantik’, Archiv für MathematischeLogik und Grundlagenforschung, 11:3–16, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wansing, H., ‘Sequent calculi for normal modal propositional logics’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 4:125–142, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wansing, H., ‘A proof-theoretic proof of functional completeness for many modal and tense logics’, in H. Wansing, (ed.), Proof Theory of Modal Logic, volume 2 of Applied Logic Series, Kluwer, 1996, pp. 123–136.

  43. Wansing, H., ‘The idea of a proof-theoretic semantics and themeaning of the logical operations’, Studia Logica, 64:3–20, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wansing, H., ‘Logical connectives for constructive modal logic’, Synthese, 2005. Proceedings of Conference on The Logic of Time and Modality, edited by T. Braüner and P. Hasle, and P. Øhrstrøm. To appear.

  45. Zucker, J. and R. S. Tragesser, ‘The adequacy problem for inferential logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7:501–516, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Roskilde University, P.O. Box 260, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Torben Braüner

Authors
  1. Torben Braüner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Braüner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braüner, T. Proof-Theoretic Functional Completeness for the Hybrid Logics of Everywhere and Elsewhere. Stud Logica 81, 191–226 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-3704-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-3704-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation