Skip to main content
Log in

The concept of personality in Russian theological literature

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term personality (ličnost’) appears in Russian theological literature in the first half of the 19th century under the influence of secular writers indebted to Romantic ideology. Confronted to person it gradually acquires somatic connotations and generally means person inarnate, creative individuality. Asomatic attitude is reflected in Nesmelov. In soteriological perspective, as Sergius Stragorodskij suggests, personality should be subjectively abandonded in order to be finally glorified by God.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Innocent alludes to Heb. 5:9.

  2. Regrettably, the inferior textology of this edition does not specify the dates and originals of the published texts.

  3. Not to be mistaken for neo-Kantian philosopher Alexander I. Vvedensky.

  4. Later Archbishop.

  5. “The Incarnation and the redemption of Christ, separated from the oikonomia of the Holy Spirit, cannot substantiate the personal magnitude of the Church, which is just as essential as its natural unity in Christ”—Лосский (2000, p. 287). “The new unity of our nature in Christ shall not rule out the ‘poly-hypostasis’ of man”—Ibid, p. 575.

References

  • Антоний (Храповицкий), епископ (1900). Полное собрание сочинений. Т. III. Казань (Bishop Antonij Kchrapovitzkij (1900). Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. T.III. Kazan).

  • [Aлeкcий (Pжaницын), apxим]. (1848). O Лицe Гocпoдa и Cпacитeля нaшeгo Ииcyca Xpиcтa (Alexij Ržanitsyn. On the Person of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ//Пpuбaвлeнuя к uз∂aнuю mвopeнuŭ cвяmыx omцeв в pyccкoм nepeвo∂e. Гo∂ шecmыŭ.(Addenda for the edition of the works of Holy Fathers in Russian translation, Moscow).

  • Бaшкиpoв, B., пpoт. (2006). Cын Бoжuŭ—Cын Чeлoвeчecкuŭ (Лoгoc-Tponoc Xpucma в mвopeнuяx npeno∂oбнoгo Maкcuмa Иcnoвe∂нuкa) (Bashkirov V., archpriest (2006). The son of God—the son of man. Logos-Tropos of Christ in the works of St. Maxim the Confessor. Žirovitsy).

  • Bвeдeнcкий, A. (1886). Cpaвнитeльнaя oцeнкa дoгмaтичecкиx cиcтeм выcoкoпpeocвящeннoгo Maкapия и apxимaндpитa Cильвecтpa (Vvedensky, A. (February–April 1886). Comparative evaluation of the dogmatic systems of most reverend Macarius and Archimandrite Sylvester)//Чmeнuя в Oбщecmвe любumeлeŭ ∂yxoвнoгo npocвeщeнuя (Readings at the Society of Spiritual Enlightenment).

  • [Иннoкeнтий (Бopиcoв)]. (1830). Пocлeдниe дни зeмнoй жизни Гocпoдa нaшeгo Ииcyca Xpиcтa. Дyшeвнoe cтpaдaниe Ииcyca Xpиcтa в caдy Гeфcимaнcкoм. Пpeдaниe (Innocent Borisov. (1830). The last days in the earthly life of our Lord Jesus Christ. The Agony in the garden. Tradition)//Xpucmuaнcкoe Чmeнue (Christian readings), Pt. XXXVIII, 181–214.

  • Иннoкeнтий (Бopиcoв). (s.d.). Coчuнeнuя Иннoкeнmuя, apxuen. Xepcoнcкoгo u Taвpuчecкoгo. Иucyc Xpucmoc—Иcкynumeль чeлoвeчecкoгo po∂a. (Innocent Borisov. Works by Innocent the Archbishop of Chersones and Taurida. Jesus Christ, the redeemer of the human race). St. Petersburg: Soikin Publishers, s.d.

  • Кипpиaн (Кepн). (1997). Teмa o чeлoвeкe и coвpeмeннocть (Cyprian Kern. (1997). The theme of man and contemporaneity)//Pyccкaя peлuгuoзнaя aнmponoлoгuя (Russian religious anthropology). Collectanea. N.K. Gavryushin (Ed.), Vol. II, Moscow.

  • Лeoнтьeв, К. H. (1875). Bизaнтизм и cлaвянcтвo//ЧOИДP (Readings from the Society of Russian History and Antiquities), III.

  • Lossky, V. (1960). Théologie négative et connaissance de Dieu chez Maître Eckhart, Libraire Philosophique J.Vrin. Paris.

  • Лoccкий, B. H. (2000). Бoгocлoвue u Бoгoвu∂eнue (V. N. Lossky. Theology and the contemplation of God. Moscow).

  • Mиxaил (Myдьюгин), apxиeпиcкoп. (1973). Ocнoвы пpaвocлaвнoгo yчeния o личнoм cпaceнии пo Cв. Пиcaнию и cвятooтeчecким выcкaзывaния (ocнoвы пpaвocлaвнoй cyбъeктивнoй coтepиoлoгии). (Teзиcы oднoимeннoй диccepтaции, пpeдcтaвлeннoй нa coиcкaниe yчeнoй cтeпeни мaгиcтpa бoгocлoвия) (Archbishop Mudyugin, M. (1973). Fundamentals of the Orthodox Doctrine of Personal Salvation. Proceeding from the scripture and patristic maxims. Summary of Master’s Thesis)//Бoгocлoвcкue mpy∂ы (Theological works). Issue X, Moscow.

  • Hecмeлoв, B. (1997, I). Hayкa o чeлoвeкe. T.I. Onыm ncuxoлoгuчecкoŭ ucmopuu u кpumuкu ocнoвныx вonpocoв жuзнu (V. Nesmelov. Science of man. Vol. I. An essay on psychological history and criticism of essential problems of life)//Pyccкaя peлигиoзнaя aнтpoпoлoгия. (Russian religious anthropology). Collectanea. N. K. Gavryushin (Ed.), Vol. I, Moscow.

  • Hecмeлoв, B. (1997, II). Hayкa o чeлoвeкe. T.II (V. Nesmelov. Science of man. Vol. II)//Pyccкaя peлигиoзнaя aнтpoпoлoгия (Russian religious anthropology). Collectanea. N. K. Gavryushin (Ed.), Vol. II, Moscow.

  • Hикaнop [Бpoвкoвич], apxиeп. (1886). O Бoгoвoплoщeнии (Archbishop Brovkovich, N. (Sept 1886). On the incarnation)//Cmpaннuк (Strannik)

  • Hикaнop (Бpoвкoвич), apxиeп. (1909). O cвoбoдe вoли c xpиcтиaнcкoй тoчки зpeния (Archbishop Brovkovich, N. (Oct 1909). On the free will from Christian point of view.//Cтpaнник (Strannik).

  • Cepгий [Cтpaгopoдcкий], apxимaндpит. (1898). Пpaвocлaвнoe yчeнue o cnaceнuu. Onыm pacкpыmuя нpaвcmвeннo-cyбъeкmuвнoŭ cmopoны cnaceнuя нa ocнoвaнuu Cв. Пucaнuя u mвopeнuŭ cвяmoomeчecкux (Archimandrite Stragorodskij, S. (1898). The Orthodox Doctrine of Salvation. An essay at disclosing the subjective ethical aspect of salvation proceeding from the scripture and patristic writ). 2nd ed., Kazan [reproduction, Moscow, 1991].

  • Cильвecтp (Maлeвaнcкий), eпиcкoп. (1889). Onыm npaвocлaвнoгo ∂oгмamuчecкoгo бoгocлoвuя c ucmopuчecкuм uзлoжeнueм ∂oгмamoв. (Malevanskij, S. An essay of orthodox dogmatic theology with historical exposition of dogmats. Vol. III. 2nd ed. Kiev.

  • Cнeгиpeв, B. (1997). Caмocoзнaниe и личнocть//Pyccкaя peлuгuoзнaя aнmponoлoгuя. (Russian religious anthropology). Collectanea. N. K. Gavryushin (Ed.), Vol. I.

  • Tapeeв, M. (1892). Иcкyшeнuя Бoгoчeлoвeкa кaк e∂uныŭ ucкynumeльныŭ no∂вuг вceŭ зeмнoŭ жuзнu Xpucma в cвязu c ucmopueю ∂oxpucmuaнcкux peлuгuŭ u xpucmuaнcкoŭ Цepквu (Tareyev, M. (1892). The temptations of God incarnate as the one redemptive deed of Christ in connection with history of pre-Christian religions and the Christian Church). Moscow.

  • Фeoдop, apxимaндpит (A.M.Бyxapeв). (1991). O ∂yxoвныx nompeбнocmяx жuзнu (Archimandrite Theodore (Bukharev, A. M. (1991). On spiritual necessities in this life). Moscow: Stolitsa Publishers.

  • Фeoфaн Aвceнeв, apxим. (1869). Из зanucoк no ncuxoлoгuu (Theophanes Avsenev, T. (1869). Selected notes on psychology). Kiev.

  • Филapeт (Гyмилeвcкий), apxиeпиcкoп. (1865). Пpaвocлaвнoe ∂oгмamuчecкoe бoгocлoвue (Archbishop Gumilevskij, P. (1865). Orthodox dogmatic theology). Vol. 2, 2nd ed., Chernigov.

  • Флopeнcкий, П., cвящ. (1977). Из бoгocлoвcкoгo нacлe∂uя (Father Florenskij, P. Selections from theological heritage)//Бoгocлoвcкиe тpyды (Theological works). Collection 17. Moscow.

  • Флopeнcкий, П.A. (1990). [Coчuнeнuя]. T. 2. У вoopaз∂eлoв мыcлu. (Father Florenskij, P. At the watersheds of thought. (Writings, vol. 2). Moscow.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolai Gavryushin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gavryushin, N. The concept of personality in Russian theological literature. Stud East Eur Thought 61, 135–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-009-9081-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-009-9081-3

Keywords

Navigation