Skip to main content
Log in

Advances in Relative Deprivation Theory and Research

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The focus of this special issue is relative deprivation (RD): the judgment that one or one’s group is worse off compared to some standard accompanied by feelings of anger and resentment. This collection of seven papers demonstrates the range of the new thinking and research about RD, and they include data from an impressive variety of participants—including Canadians (both French- and English-speakers), Dutch, the Maoris of New Zealand, Mongols, Singaporeans, and South Africans (both Blacks and Whites). These seven papers show that if RD, and its counterpart, relative gratification, are defined carefully, at the right level of analysis and employed within larger theoretical models, the concept offers invaluable insight to how people respond to often dramatic changes in their objective circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84, 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G. (1996). Dynamics of theory change in the social sciences: Relative deprivation and collective violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right- wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. H. (1992). Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1182–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice? Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18(6), 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, S., & Rule, J. (1987). Relative deprivation and related psychological theories of civil violence: A critical review. Research in Social Movements: Conflicts and Change, 9, 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, J., & Tierney, K. (1982). Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research. The Sociological Quarterly, 23, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, E. L. (1946). Problems in prejudice. New York: Kings Crown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects generalize to non-contacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40(2), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2015) Stouffer and relative deprivation. Social Psychology Quarterly (in press).

  • Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Meertens, R. W., Wagner, U., van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C., & Duckitt, J. (2000). Personality and prejudice: A meta- analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic critique. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather J. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, H.J., Pettigrew, T.F. Advances in Relative Deprivation Theory and Research. Soc Just Res 28, 1–6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0231-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0231-5

Keywords

Navigation