Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Types of Temporary Employment: An 8-Year Follow-Up of Labour Market Attachment

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to find out how heterogeneous temporary employment is reflected in later labour market attachment. Using data from Finnish Quality of Work Life Surveys in 1990, 1997 and 2003 merged with an 8-year register follow-up, we compared permanent workers with three categories of temporary employees: substitutes, common fixed-term (e.g. project workers), and periphery (seasonal, on-call, temporary agency and employment subsidy) workers. First, we applied sequence analysis to identify the main activities at the end of each follow-up year for all employees with permanent and temporary contracts. On this basis, we formed six typical employment sequence clusters. Second, we performed multinomial logistic regression to find out whether there are statistically significant differences between temporary and permanent employees in terms of how they are divided between the sequence clusters. Four in five permanent employees were in stable employment over the following 8 years, compared to only two in five temporary periphery workers. The corresponding proportion for substitute workers was 70% and for common fixed-term workers 64%. Compared to permanent workers, those in common fixed-term or periphery temporary employment were more likely to become unemployed, whereas substitute workers were not. Our major finding is that periphery employment clearly increases the risk of being edged out of the labour market through retirement, especially on disability pension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aisenbrey, S., & Fasang, A. (2010). New life for old ideas: The ‘‘second wave’’ of sequence analysis. bringing the ‘‘course’’ back into the life course. Sociological Methods and Research, 38(3), 420–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., & Dallner, M. (2002). Work environment and health in different types of temporary jobs. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, P. (2009). Flexible employment and inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemann, T., & Datta, D. K. (2014). Analyzing sequence data. Optimal matching in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(1), 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., Francestoni, M., & Frank, J. (2002). Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? The Economic Journal, 112(480), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broschak, J. P., Davis-Blake, A., & Block, E. S. (2008). Nonstandard, not substandard: The relationship among work arrangements, work attitudes, and job performance. Work and Occupations, 35(1), 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzinsky-Fay, C., Kohler, U., & Luniak, M. (2006). Sequence analysis with Stata. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 435–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutuli, G., & Guetto, R. (2012). Fixed-term contracts, economic conjuncture, and training opportunities: A comparative analysis across european labour markets. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 616–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C., Veliziotis, M., Pacheco, G., & Webber, D. J. (2015). Is temporary employment a cause or consequence of poor mental health? A panel data analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 134, 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. R., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2005). Non-standard employment relations and wages among school leavers in the Netherlands. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3), 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia, L. (2010). Temporary/permanent workers’ wage gap: A brand-new form of wage inequality? Labour, 24(2), 178–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound. (2013). Employment polarisation and job quality in the crisis: European Jobs Monitor 2013. Eurofound: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2016) Temporary employees as percentage of the total number of employees, by sex, age and country of birth (%), 1995–2015. Eurostat Data Explorer. Ec.europa.eu. Accessed 27th June 2016.

  • Fang, T., & MacPhail, F. (2008). Transitions from Temporary to permanent work in Canada: Who makes the transition and why? Social Indicators Research, 88(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fervers, L., & Schwander, H. (2015). Are outsiders equally out everywhere? The economic disadvantage of outsiders in cross-national perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S., & Stecy-Hildebrandt, N. (2014). Lasting disadvantage? Comparing career trajectories of matched temporary and permanent workers in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 51(4), 293–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S., & Vosko, L. F. (2008). Temporary employment and social inequality in Canada: Exploring intersections of gender, race and immigration status. Social Indicators Research, 88(1), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash, V. (2008). Bridge or trap? Temporary workers’ transitions to unemployment and to the standard employment contract. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 651–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, J.-A., Widmer, E. D., Bucher, P., & Notredame, C. (2010). Multichannel sequence analysis applied to social science data. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebel, M. (2010). Early career consequences of temporary employment in Germany and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), 641–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horemans, J. (2016). Polarisation of non-standard employment in Europe: Exploring a missing piece of the inequality puzzle. Social Indicators Research, 125(1), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, L. (2016). The structure of the permanent job wage premium: Evidence from Europe. Industrial Relations, 55(1), 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. (2012). Job quality and precarious work: Clarifications, controversies, and challenges. Work and Occupations, 39(4), 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhanen, M., & Nätti, J. (2014). Involuntary temporary and part-time work, job quality and well-being at work. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 783–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keep, E., & James, S. (2012). Are skills the answer to bad jobs? Incentives to learn at the bottom end of the labour market. In C. Warhurst, F. Carré, P. Findlay, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Are bad jobs inevitable? Trends, determinants and responses to job quality in the twenty-first century (pp. 240–253). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompier, M., Ybema, J. F., Janssen, J., & Taris, T. (2009). Employment contracts: Crosssectional and longitudinal relations with quality of working life, health and wellbeing. Journal of Occupational Health, 51, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyyrä, T. (2008). Partial unemployment insurance benefits and the transition rate to regular work. VATT Discussion papers 440. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research. http://www.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/k440.pdf. Accessed 15th July 2016.

  • Liukkonen, V. (2012). Non-standard employment and health with respect to sense of coherence and social capital. Tampere: University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchington, M., Grimshaw, D., Rubery, J., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2005). Fragmenting work: Blurring organizational boundaries and disordering hierarchies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). Labour force survey [e-publication]. Employment and unemployment in 2015. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/2015/13/tyti_2015_13_2016-04-12_kat_002_en.html. Accessed 17th November 2016.

  • Ojala, S., Nätti, J. & Kauhanen, M. (2015). Työn laatu ja myöhempi työura osa- ja määräaikaisessa työssä. [Job quality and later work career among part-time and temporary employees.] Tampere: University of Tampere. http://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/97990. Accessed 28th February 2017.

  • Reichelt, M. (2015). Career progression from temporary employment: How bridge and trap functions differ by task complexity. European Sociological Review, 31(5), 558–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repo, K. (2010). Finnish child home care allowance—users’ perspectives and perceptions. In J. Sipilä, K. Repo, & T. Rissanen (Eds.), Cash-for-childcare: The consequences for caring mothers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saloniemi, A., & Zeytinoglu, I. U. (2007). Achieving flexibility through insecurity: A comparison of work environments in fixed-term and permanent jobs in Finland and Canada. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(1), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, S. (2009). The social consequences of insecure jobs. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, G. (2008). Full employment in Europe. Managing labour market transitions and risks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steijn, B., Need, A., & Gesthuizen, M. (2006). Well begun, half done? Long-term effects of labour market entry in the Netherlands, 1950–2000. Work, Employment and Society, 20(3), 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer, M., Ritschard, G., Gabadinho, A., & Müller, N. S. (2011). Discrepancy analysis of state sequences. Sociological Methods and Research, 40, 471–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutela, H. & Lehto, A.-M. (2014). Työolojen muutokset 1977–2013. [Changes in Working Conditions, Finland 1977–2013)]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.

  • Wagenaar, A., Kompier, M., Houtman, I., van den Bossche, S., & Taris, T. (2012). Employment contracts and health selection. Unhealthy employees out and healthy employees in? JOEM, 54(10), 1192–1200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Academy of Finland (grant 277376) and the Finnish Work Environment Fund (grant 112312) supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

    Satu Ojala, Jouko Nätti & Liudmila Lipiäinen

Authors
  1. Satu Ojala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jouko Nätti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liudmila Lipiäinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satu Ojala.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Dependent and independent variable correlations
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ojala, S., Nätti, J. & Lipiäinen, L. Types of Temporary Employment: An 8-Year Follow-Up of Labour Market Attachment. Soc Indic Res 138, 141–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1648-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1648-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation