Abstract
The present paper reflects on the life and career of Janet Spence (1923–2015) by situating her experiences within the history of women and gender in American psychology. This history has revealed the structural factors that have affected women’s participation in psychology, the shared themes in women’s interpersonal and professional experiences, and the specific strategies that women have used to navigate an androcentric, and at times overtly sexist, discipline. In spanning the second half of the twentieth century, Spence’s career provides an interesting case study of how these decades of institutional and political change affected a specific woman scientist and her science. I argue that her biography can offer rich insights into the complexly intertwined, and even reflexive, relationships among psychologists, their psychologies, and their contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association, Committee on Women in Psychology. (1986). Report on women in psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.602.
Bigler, R. (2017). Illuminating a trail: The career and scholarship of Janet Taylor Spence. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0837-9.
Braine, L. G. (2009, March 14). Interview by L. Ball, A. Rutherford, & A. Karera [Video Recording]. Psychology’s feminist voices oral history and online archive project. Newport, RI. http://www.feministvoices.com/lila-braine/.
Bryan, A. I., & Boring, E. G. (1946). Women in American psychology: Statistics from the OPP questionnaire. American Psychologist, 1, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056867.
Bryan, A. I., & Boring, E. G. (1947). Women in American psychology: Factors affecting their professional careers. American Psychologist, 2, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060937.
Cameron, C. E., & Hagen, J. W. (2005). Women in child development: Themes from the SRCD oral history project. History of Psychology, 8, 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.8.3.289.
Capshew, J. H., & Laszlo, A. C. (1986). "We would not take no for an answer": Women psychologists and gender politics during World War II. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00213.x.
Chrisler, J. C., & Smith, C. A. (2004). Feminism and psychology. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 271–291). Westport: Praeger.
Chrisler, J. C., de las Fuentes, C., Durvasula, R. S., Esnil, E. M., McHugh, M. C., Miles-Cohen, S. E., … Wisdom, J. P. (2013). The American Psychological Association’s Committee on Women in Psychology: 40 years of contributions to the transformation of psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313505442.
Clark, M. P. (1983). Mamie Phipps Clark. In A. N. O'Connell & N. F. Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (pp. 267–277). New York: Columbia University Press.
Crawford, M., & Marecek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female, 1968-1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00993.x.
Eagly, A. H. (2008, March 1). Interview with A. In Rutherford [Video Recording]. Psychology’s feminist voices oral history and online archive project: Bethesda, MD. http://www.feministvoices.com/alice-eagly/.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2017). Janet Taylor Spence: Innovator in the study of gender. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0835-y.
Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027260.
Furumoto, L. (1987). On the margins: Women and the professionalization of psychology in the United States, 1890-1940. In M. G. Ash & W. R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth century thought and society (pp. 93–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, E. J. (1980). Autobiography. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), History of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 7, pp. 239–272). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
Hegarty, P. (2007). From genius inverts to gendered intelligence: Lewis Terman and the power of the norm. History of Psychology, 10, 132–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.132.
Hegarty, P. (2012). Getting Miles away from Terman: Did the CRPS fund Catharine Cox Miles’s unsilenced psychology of sex? History of Psychology, 15, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025725.
Herman, E. (1995). The curious courtship of psychology and women’s liberation. In E. Herman (Ed.), The romance of American psychology (pp. 276–303). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Johnson, A., & Johnston, E. (2015). Up the years with the Bettersons: Gender and parent education in interwar America. History of Psychology, 18(3), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039521.
Johnston, E., & Johnson, A. (2008). Searching for the second generation of American women psychologists. History of Psychology, 11, 40–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.11.3.208.
Johnston, E., & Johnson, A. (2017). Balancing life and work by unbending gender: Struggles and challenges of early American women psychologists. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 53, 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21862.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kohlstedt, S., & Longino, H. (1997). The women, gender, and science question: What do research on women in science and research on gender and science have to do with each other? Osiris, 12, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/649263.
Lal, S. (2002). Giving children security: Mamie Phipps Clark and the racialization of child psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.57.1.20.
Lomax, E. (1977). The Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial: Some of its contributions to early research in child development. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(197707)13:3<283::AID-JHBS2300130309>3.0.CO;2-J.
Maccoby, E. E. (1989). Eleanor E. Maccoby. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography, Vol. 8 (pp. 290–335). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Markowitz, G., & Rosner, D. (2000). Children, race, and power: Kenneth and Mamie Clark's Northside center. New York: Routledge.
Mednick, M. T. (1988). Martha T. Mednick, 1929. In A. N. O'Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (vol. 2, pp. 245–259). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mednick, M. T. S., & Urbanski, L. (1991). The origins and activities of APA's division of the psychology of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00437.x.
Milam, E. L., & Nye, R. A. (2015). An introduction to scientific masculinities. Osiris, 30, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/682953.
Nicholson, I. (2011). “Shocking” masculinity: Stanley Milgram, “obedience to authority,” and the “crisis of manhood” in Cold War America. Isis, 102, 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1086/660129.
Nye, R. A. (1997). Medicine and science as masculine fields of honor. Osiris, 12, 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/649267.
O’Connell, A. (1988). Synthesis and resynthesis: Profiles and patterns of achievement 2. In A. N. O’Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 317–366). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ostertag, P. A., & McNamara, J. R. (1991). “Feminization” of psychology: The changing sex ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00413.x.
Porter, T. (2006). Is the life of the scientist a scientific unit? Isis, 97, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/504737.
Radtke, H. L., & Stam, H. (2016). A history of psychology’s complicated relationship to feminism: Theorizing difference. In S. H. Klempe & R. Smith (Eds.), Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology (pp. 167–185). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Rodkey, E. N. (2015). The visual cliff’s forgotten menagerie: Rats, goats, babies, and myth-making in the history of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 51, 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21712.
Russo, N. F. (1988). Women’s participation in psychology: Reflecting and shaping the social context. In A. N. O’Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 9–27). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Russo, N. F., & Dumont, A. (1997). A history of Division 35 (Psychology of Women): Origins, issues, activities, future. In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the divisions of the American Psychological Association (Vol. 2, pp. 211–238). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rutherford, A. (2012). Starting from strengths: Mamie Phipps Clark, developmental psychologist. In W. E. Pickren, D. Dewsbury, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 261–275). New York: Psychology Press.
Rutherford, A. (2015). Maintaining masculinity in mid-20th century American psychology: Edwin Boring, scientific eminence, and the “woman problem.” Osiris: Scientific Masculinities, 30, 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/683022.
Rutherford, A. (2017). “Making better use of U.S. women”: Psychology, sex roles, and womanpower in post-WWII America. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 53, 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21861.
Rutherford, A., & Granek, L. (2010). Emergence and development of the psychology of women. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 19–41). New York: Springer.
Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039533.
Rutherford, A., Marecek, J., & Sheese, K. (2012). Psychology of women and gender. In D. K. Freedheim & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: History of Psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 279–301). New York: Wiley.
Rutherford, A., Sheese, K., & Ruck, N. (2015). Feminism and theoretical psychology. In J. Martin, K. Slaney, & J. Sugarman (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 374–391). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Scarborough, E., & Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.
Scarborough, E., & Rutherford, A. (2017). Women in the APA. In W. E. Pickren & A. Rutherford (Eds.), 125 years of the American Psychological Association (pp. 321–357). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Spence, J. T. (1988). Janet Taylor Spence. In A. N. O’Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 190–203). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spence, J. T. (2010). Inside the psychologist’s studio with Janet Taylor Spence. Interview with Kay Deaux. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-JtHYRwGfE.
Spence, J. T. (2011). Off with the old, on with the new. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414826.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Stevens, G., & Gardner, S. (1982a). The women of psychology: Pioneers and innovators (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company.
Stevens, G., & Gardner, S. (1982b). The women of psychology: Expansion and refinement (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company.
Terrall, M. (2006). Biography as cultural history of science. Isis, 97, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/504736.
Tolman, R. (1943). Some work of women psychologists in the war. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 7, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053611.
Valentine, E. (2010). Women in early 20th-century experimental psychology. The Psychologist, 23(12), 972–974. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-23/edition-12/women-early-20th-century-experimental-psychology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
I have complied with ethical standards in the completion of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rutherford, A. Contextualizing a Life in Science: Janet Taylor Spence and the History of Women and Gender in American Psychology. Sex Roles 77, 757–764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0836-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0836-x