Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contextualizing a Life in Science: Janet Taylor Spence and the History of Women and Gender in American Psychology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper reflects on the life and career of Janet Spence (1923–2015) by situating her experiences within the history of women and gender in American psychology. This history has revealed the structural factors that have affected women’s participation in psychology, the shared themes in women’s interpersonal and professional experiences, and the specific strategies that women have used to navigate an androcentric, and at times overtly sexist, discipline. In spanning the second half of the twentieth century, Spence’s career provides an interesting case study of how these decades of institutional and political change affected a specific woman scientist and her science. I argue that her biography can offer rich insights into the complexly intertwined, and even reflexive, relationships among psychologists, their psychologies, and their contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association, Committee on Women in Psychology. (1986). Report on women in psychology. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, R. (2017). Illuminating a trail: The career and scholarship of Janet Taylor Spence. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0837-9.

  • Braine, L. G. (2009, March 14). Interview by L. Ball, A. Rutherford, & A. Karera [Video Recording]. Psychology’s feminist voices oral history and online archive project. Newport, RI. http://www.feministvoices.com/lila-braine/.

  • Bryan, A. I., & Boring, E. G. (1946). Women in American psychology: Statistics from the OPP questionnaire. American Psychologist, 1, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, A. I., & Boring, E. G. (1947). Women in American psychology: Factors affecting their professional careers. American Psychologist, 2, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C. E., & Hagen, J. W. (2005). Women in child development: Themes from the SRCD oral history project. History of Psychology, 8, 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.8.3.289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capshew, J. H., & Laszlo, A. C. (1986). "We would not take no for an answer": Women psychologists and gender politics during World War II. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00213.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisler, J. C., & Smith, C. A. (2004). Feminism and psychology. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 271–291). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisler, J. C., de las Fuentes, C., Durvasula, R. S., Esnil, E. M., McHugh, M. C., Miles-Cohen, S. E., … Wisdom, J. P. (2013). The American Psychological Association’s Committee on Women in Psychology: 40 years of contributions to the transformation of psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313505442.

  • Clark, M. P. (1983). Mamie Phipps Clark. In A. N. O'Connell & N. F. Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (pp. 267–277). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Marecek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female, 1968-1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00993.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (2008, March 1). Interview with A. In Rutherford [Video Recording]. Psychology’s feminist voices oral history and online archive project: Bethesda, MD. http://www.feministvoices.com/alice-eagly/.

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2017). Janet Taylor Spence: Innovator in the study of gender. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0835-y.

  • Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furumoto, L. (1987). On the margins: Women and the professionalization of psychology in the United States, 1890-1940. In M. G. Ash & W. R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth century thought and society (pp. 93–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. (1980). Autobiography. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), History of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 7, pp. 239–272). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, P. (2007). From genius inverts to gendered intelligence: Lewis Terman and the power of the norm. History of Psychology, 10, 132–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, P. (2012). Getting Miles away from Terman: Did the CRPS fund Catharine Cox Miles’s unsilenced psychology of sex? History of Psychology, 15, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. (1995). The curious courtship of psychology and women’s liberation. In E. Herman (Ed.), The romance of American psychology (pp. 276–303). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., & Johnston, E. (2015). Up the years with the Bettersons: Gender and parent education in interwar America. History of Psychology, 18(3), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, E., & Johnson, A. (2008). Searching for the second generation of American women psychologists. History of Psychology, 11, 40–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.11.3.208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, E., & Johnson, A. (2017). Balancing life and work by unbending gender: Struggles and challenges of early American women psychologists. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 53, 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlstedt, S., & Longino, H. (1997). The women, gender, and science question: What do research on women in science and research on gender and science have to do with each other? Osiris, 12, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/649263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, S. (2002). Giving children security: Mamie Phipps Clark and the racialization of child psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.57.1.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, E. (1977). The Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial: Some of its contributions to early research in child development. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(197707)13:3<283::AID-JHBS2300130309>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1989). Eleanor E. Maccoby. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography, Vol. 8 (pp. 290–335). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, G., & Rosner, D. (2000). Children, race, and power: Kenneth and Mamie Clark's Northside center. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, M. T. (1988). Martha T. Mednick, 1929. In A. N. O'Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (vol. 2, pp. 245–259). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Mednick, M. T. S., & Urbanski, L. (1991). The origins and activities of APA's division of the psychology of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00437.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, E. L., & Nye, R. A. (2015). An introduction to scientific masculinities. Osiris, 30, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/682953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, I. (2011). “Shocking” masculinity: Stanley Milgram, “obedience to authority,” and the “crisis of manhood” in Cold War America. Isis, 102, 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1086/660129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, R. A. (1997). Medicine and science as masculine fields of honor. Osiris, 12, 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/649267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, A. (1988). Synthesis and resynthesis: Profiles and patterns of achievement 2. In A. N. O’Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 317–366). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Ostertag, P. A., & McNamara, J. R. (1991). “Feminization” of psychology: The changing sex ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00413.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (2006). Is the life of the scientist a scientific unit? Isis, 97, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/504737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radtke, H. L., & Stam, H. (2016). A history of psychology’s complicated relationship to feminism: Theorizing difference. In S. H. Klempe & R. Smith (Eds.), Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology (pp. 167–185). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodkey, E. N. (2015). The visual cliff’s forgotten menagerie: Rats, goats, babies, and myth-making in the history of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 51, 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, N. F. (1988). Women’s participation in psychology: Reflecting and shaping the social context. In A. N. O’Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 9–27). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, N. F., & Dumont, A. (1997). A history of Division 35 (Psychology of Women): Origins, issues, activities, future. In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the divisions of the American Psychological Association (Vol. 2, pp. 211–238). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A. (2012). Starting from strengths: Mamie Phipps Clark, developmental psychologist. In W. E. Pickren, D. Dewsbury, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 261–275). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A. (2015). Maintaining masculinity in mid-20th century American psychology: Edwin Boring, scientific eminence, and the “woman problem.” Osiris: Scientific Masculinities, 30, 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/683022.

  • Rutherford, A. (2017). “Making better use of U.S. women”: Psychology, sex roles, and womanpower in post-WWII America. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 53, 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., & Granek, L. (2010). Emergence and development of the psychology of women. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 19–41). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., Marecek, J., & Sheese, K. (2012). Psychology of women and gender. In D. K. Freedheim & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: History of Psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 279–301). New York: Wiley.

  • Rutherford, A., Sheese, K., & Ruck, N. (2015). Feminism and theoretical psychology. In J. Martin, K. Slaney, & J. Sugarman (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 374–391). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, E., & Furumoto, L. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, E., & Rutherford, A. (2017). Women in the APA. In W. E. Pickren & A. Rutherford (Eds.), 125 years of the American Psychological Association (pp. 321–357). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1988). Janet Taylor Spence. In A. N. O’Connell & N. Felipe Russo (Eds.), Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 190–203). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (2010). Inside the psychologist’s studio with Janet Taylor Spence. Interview with Kay Deaux. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-JtHYRwGfE.

  • Spence, J. T. (2011). Off with the old, on with the new. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Gardner, S. (1982a). The women of psychology: Pioneers and innovators (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Gardner, S. (1982b). The women of psychology: Expansion and refinement (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrall, M. (2006). Biography as cultural history of science. Isis, 97, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/504736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. (1943). Some work of women psychologists in the war. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 7, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, E. (2010). Women in early 20th-century experimental psychology. The Psychologist, 23(12), 972–974. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-23/edition-12/women-early-20th-century-experimental-psychology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Rutherford.

Ethics declarations

I have complied with ethical standards in the completion of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rutherford, A. Contextualizing a Life in Science: Janet Taylor Spence and the History of Women and Gender in American Psychology. Sex Roles 77, 757–764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0836-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0836-x

Keywords

Navigation