Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship between Mother-Daughter Self-Objectification: Identifying Direct, Indirect, and Conditional Direct Effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grounded in aspects of objectification theory, social learning theory, and attachment theory, we investigated the extent to which mothers’ and daughters’ self-objectification were related to one another’s and also identified three potential intervening factors. Specifically, we hypothesized a (statistical) direct effect of mothers’ self-objectification on that of their daughters’ (H1), as well as investigated a conditional direct effect (i.e., maternal care) (H2) and two indirect effects (i.e., co-rumination and mothers’ weight concerns) (H3) as intervening factors that may help explain the relationship between mothers’ and daughters’ self-objectification. A sample of 199 U.S. undergraduate women and their mothers completed an online survey; daughters and mothers mean ages were 19.42 and 50.15, respectively, with a majority of them reporting a normal body mass index (daughters: 23.05; mothers: 25.74) and being White/Caucasian (daughters: 79.4 %; mothers: 80.9 %). The results generally supported the hypotheses. First, H1 was confirmed: Mothers’ and daughters’ self-objectification were positively related to one another’s. Second, perceived maternal care was found to moderate this relationship, such that daughters reported higher levels of self-objectification when they perceived their mothers to be less caring; thus, H2 was confirmed. Third, H3 was partially confirmed: Perceived co-rumination about weight with mothers, but not perceived mothers’ weight-related concerns, was found to be a significant mediator. These results suggest that mothers can serve as protective or inhibitory factors in daughters’ experience of self-objectification depending on mothers’ level of care and their direct communication with their daughters’ about their bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Abraczinskas, M., Fisak, B., & Barnes, R. D. (2012). The relation between parental influence, ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬body image, and eating behaviors in a nonclinical female sample. Body Image, 9, 93–100. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.10.005

  • Ackard, D. M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Perry, C. (2006). Parent-child connectedness ‬‬‬‬and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, A., Segrin, C., & Harwood, J. (2014). Appearance-related communication mediates the link between self-objectification and health and well-being outcomes. Human Communication Research, 40, 463–482. doi:10.1111/hcre.12036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, A., Segrin, C., Harwood, J., & Bonito, J. A. (2015). Co-rumination of fat talk and weight control practices: An application of confirmation theory. Health Communication (in press).

  • Aubrey, J. S., Henson, J. R., Hopper, K. M., & Smith, S. E. (2009). A picture is worth twenty words (about the self): Testing the priming influence of visual sexual objectification on women’s self-objectification. Communication Research Reports, 26, 271–284. doi:10.1080/08824090903293551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, S. (2011). Women’s body image and the role of culture: A review of the literature. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7, 374–394. doi:10.5964/ejop.v7i2.135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, R., Wertheim, E., & Love, A. (1998). Eating attitudes and weight-loss attempts in female adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 43–57. doi:10.1023/A:1022876715005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism; Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 attachment. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calmes, C. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2008). Rumination in interpersonal relationships: Does co-rumination explain gender differences in emotional distress and relationship satisfaction among college students? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 577–590. doi:10.1007/s10608-008-9200-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calogero, R. M. (2009). Objectification processes and disordered eating in British women and men. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 394–402. doi:10.1177/1359105309102192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/

  • Clarke, L. H., & Griffin, M. (2007). Becoming and being gendered through the body: Older women, their mothers and body image. Ageing and Society, 27, 701–718. doi:10.1017/S0144686X0700623X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, E., Toray, T., Wang, M. C., & Valdez, N. N. (2008). Maternal effects on daughters’ eating pathology and body image. Eating Behaviors, 9, 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., Lee, I., Portnoy, G., Gurung, A., Khati, D., Jha, P., & Regmi, A. C. (2009). Objectified body consciousness in a developing country: A comparison of mothers and daughters in the US and Nepal. Sex Roles, 60, 174–185. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9521-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C. L., Grant, D. M., Byrd-Craven, J., Mills, A. C., Judah, M. R., & Lechner, W. V. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Co-Rumination Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 171–175. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.002.

  • Estlein, R., & Theiss, J. A. (2013, June). Responsiveness and control in marital and parental communication: Exploring consistencies across family subsystems and between perceived and observed behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, London, England.

  • Francis, L. A., & Birch, L. L. (2005). Maternal influences on daughters’ restrained eating behavior. Health Psychology, 24, 548–554. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.548.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164–175. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00350.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E., & King, A. (1997). Primetime sexual harassment. Violence Against Women, 3, 129–148. doi:10.1177/1077801297003002003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, R., & Helmick, A. (2008). The influence of men’s self-objectification on the drive for muscularity: Self-esteem, body satisfaction and muscle dysmorphia. International Journal of Men’s Health, 7, 288–298. doi:10.3149/jmh.0703.288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experience. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Wise, S. L., Budge, S. L., Lindberg, S. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Individuation or identification? Self-objectification and the mother–adolescent relationship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 366–380. doi:10.1177/0361684312468425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keery, H., van den Berg, P., & Thompson, J. K. (2004). An evaluation of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance with adolescent girls. Body Image, 1, 237–251. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keery, H., Eisenberg, M. E., Boutelle, K., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Story, M. (2006). Relationships between maternal and adolescent weight-related behaviors and concerns: The role of perception. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61, 105–111. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). “Master your Johnson”: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality and Culture, 7, 98–119. doi:10.1007/s12119-003-1005-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. P., Smolak, L., & Hayden, H. (1994). The relation of sociocultural factors to eating attitudes and behaviors among middle school girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 471–490. doi:10.1177/0272431694014004004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. (1997). Beefcake versus cheesecake in the 1990s: Sexist portrayals of both genders in television commercials. Howard Journal of Communications, 8, 237–249. doi:10.1080/10646179709361757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00544.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760–769. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N., & Hyde, J. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miga, E. M., Hare, A., Allen, J. P., & Manning, N. (2010). The relation of insecure attachment states of mind and romantic attachment styles to adolescent aggression in romantic relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 463–481. doi:10.1080/14616734.2010.501971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Hirschberger, G. (2003). The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 20–40. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9824-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 153–163. doi:10.1177/0011000010384279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumark-Sztainer, D., Bauer, K. W., Friend, S., Hannan, P. J., Story, M., & Berge, J. M. (2010). Family weight talk and dieting: How much do they matter for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors in adolescent girls? Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 270–276. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.001.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichter, M. (2000). Fat talk. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dougherty, M., Schmitz, K. H., Hearst, M. O., Covelli, M., & Kurzer, M. S. (2011). Dual conversations: Body talk among young women and their social contacts. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1191–1204. doi:10.1177/1049732311405804.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, R. F., Faure, K., & Chabrol, H. (2009). Gender differences in parental influences on adolescent body dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Sex Roles, 61, 837–849. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9690-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, J., Silberstein, L., & Striegel-Moore, R. (1984). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 267–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73, 1830–1843. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., Carlson, W., & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1019–1031. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1019.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safford, S., Alloy, L., & Pieracci, A. (2007). A comparison of two measures of parental behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 375–384. doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9092-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., Bauer, A., & Taylor Murphy, M. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent-child communication, and entitlement and adaptive traits in adult children. Family Relations, 61, 237–252. doi:10.1111/j.1741.3729.2011.00689.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzack C. (1990). Confessing excess: Women and the politics of body reduction‬. New York: SUNY Press‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

  • Starr, C. R., & Ferguson, G. M. (2012). Sexy dolls, sexy grade-schoolers? Media & maternal influences on young girls’ self-sexualization. Sex Roles, 67, 463–476. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0183-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & McCourt, A. (2013). Body appreciation in adult women: Relationships with age and body satisfaction. Body Image, 10, 624–627. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, P., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Hannan, P. J., & Jess Haines, J. (2007). Is dieting advice from magazines helpful or harmful? Five-year associations with weight-control behaviors and psychological outcomes in adolescents. Pediatrics, 119, e30–e37. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, K., & Parker, G. (1990). Reliability of the parental bonding instrument and intimate bond measure scales. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 199–202. doi:10.3109/00048679009077683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, K., Niven, H., Parker, G., & Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. (2005). The stability of the parental bonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychological Medicine, 35, 387–393. doi:10.1017/S0033291704003538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/t19098-000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, 617 Caldwell Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Analisa Arroyo & Kristin K. Andersen

Authors
  1. Analisa Arroyo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristin K. Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Analisa Arroyo.

Ethics declarations

Because our study involved human subjects, we followed the guidelines for seeking approval from the Institutional Review Board. Upon approval of IRB, all participants read and agreed to the informed consent presented to them before completing this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arroyo, A., Andersen, K.K. The Relationship between Mother-Daughter Self-Objectification: Identifying Direct, Indirect, and Conditional Direct Effects. Sex Roles 74, 231–241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0554-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0554-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation