Skip to main content
Log in

The Functional and Semantic Category of Appeal as a Linguistic Tool in Political Propaganda Texts (in the Example of the English Language)

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relevance of the research is defined by the need to create a set of linguistic means, which would contribute to effective communication with the general public, and the need to study different functional-semantic categories, including appeals, for the competent formation of public opinion in the political context. The research aims to comprehend the functioning of linguistic means used as appeals in the example of political propaganda texts in the English media field. The methodology is based on the theoretical study of the works of modern linguists, linguistic, structural, and communicative analysis of appeal linguistic units and contexts. The research considered the linguistic means that form the functional-semantic category of the appeal, examples of political contexts from the British and American media were presented, the functions of appeal were presented using specific examples, an idea of the communicative side of political propaganda texts and audience participation in this process was formed, emphasis was placed on different types of propaganda (white, black, gray), the following groups of appeals were characterized: imperatives (volitional and involuntary). The materials presented in this research can be used to form an idea of the functional-semantic category of appeal, the choice of linguistic means for the purpose of information promotion in the media or social networks, the study of communicative strategies in linguistics and their successful implementation, consideration of political propaganda texts, increasing efficiency when influencing the audience, further implementation of means of appeal in machine learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mykhailovych, Ihor. 2022. The role of propaganda in the formation of personal semantic constructs. Insight 8: 24–38. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2022-8-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dzyana, Halyna, Dzyanyy Rostyslav. 2023. Public administrative activity in the conditions of contemporary uncertainty: information and communication aspect. Democratic Governance 1(31): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2023.01.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhmetova, Madeniyet, Kunanbayeva Salima, and Kassymbekova Markhabat. 2019. Development of metalanguage competence through content and branch training. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v11n2.17.

  4. Sarsembayeva, Aiman, Tulenbergenova Nazigul, Assanova Gulnar, Kalibekuly Tolkyn, and Esenalieva Zhanar. 2018. English idioms describing a person’s character! XLinguae 11(3): 166–175. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.16.

  5. Kovalchuk, Oleh. 2023. Components of branding and the application of artificial intelligence technologies in their implementation. Economic Forum 1(2): 25–29. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2023-2-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caldarelli, Guido, Rocco De Nicola, Fabio Del Vigna, Marinella Petrocchi, and Fabio Saracco. 2020. The role of bot squads in the political propaganda on Twitter. Communications Physics 3: 81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-0340-4.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanday, Akib Mohi Ud, Qamar Rayees Din, Khan, and Rabani Syed Tanzeel. 2021. Identifying propaganda from online social networks during COVID-19 using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Information Technology 13(1): 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00550-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, Rong-Ching, Chun-Ming Lai, Kai-Lai Chang, and Lin Chu-Hsing. 2021. Dataset of Propaganda Techniques of the State-Sponsored Information Operation of the People’s Republic of China. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.07544.

  9. Absattar, Adil, Manshuk Mambetova, and Orynay Zhubay. 2022. The potential of emotive language to influence the understanding of textual information in media coverage. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9: 222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01232-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krishnamurthy, Gangeshwar, Raj Kumar Gupta, and Yinping Yang. 2020. SocCogCom at SemEval. 2020 Task 11: Characterizing and Detecting Propaganda using Sentence-Level Emotional Salience Features. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation 1: 1793–1801. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.235.

  11. Kennedy, Brendan, Preni Golazizian, Jackson Trager, Mohammad Atari, Joe Hoover, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, and Morteza Dehghani. 2023. The (moral) language of hate. PNAS Nexus 2(7): pgad210. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. AlMumar, Hisham, Dheyaa Adnan, and Al-Fatlawi, Sami Abbas Al-Asadi. 2020. Recognising Illocutionary forces of English imperatives by Iraqi EFL learners: a pragmatic study. International Journal of Innovation Creativity and Change 12(7): 515–536.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Irfan, Hanan Khaja Mohammad. 2019. An analysis of the linguistic techniques of propaganda in marketing and politics. International Journal of English Learning and Teaching Skills 2(2): 1181–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chernobrov, Dmitry, Emma Briant. 2020. Competing propagandas: how the United States and Russia represent mutual propaganda activities. Politics 42(3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720966171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Min, Bumgi, Luwei Rose. 2020. How propaganda techniques leverage their advantages: a cross-national study of the effects of Chinese International propaganda on the U.S. and South Korean audiences. Political Communication 38(3): 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kryvenko, Serhiy. 2015. The author of a political text and his role in political discourse. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University 1: 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Terpstra, Fredric. 2020. Language of destruction. Modern propaganda and semiotic ethics. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strubytskyi, Rostyslav, Natalya Shakhovska. 2023. Method and models for sentiment analysis and hidden propaganda finding. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 12: 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Welch, David. 2021. Guide to British Government Information and Propaganda, 1939–2009. https://goo.su/Rgaa8f.

  20. Rogers, Richard, Sabine Niederer. 2020. The politics of social media manipulation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotsyuba, Nadia. 2015. The appeal of texts of the official-business style. Scientific Works Philology Linguistics 253(241): 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Javed, Ahmad. 2022. Appellative function examples and characteristics. https://englopedia.com/appellative-function/.

  23. Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on the Russian aggression against Ukraine. 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_22_1483.

  24. Zeffman, Henry. 2016. Don’t let Brexit ruin Britishness, says carmaker to James Bond. The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dont-let-brexit-ruin-britishness-says-carmaker-to-james-bond-jxrnzrqbn.

  25. Let’s hope Liz Truss’s wild strategy helps us weather this winter. 2022. The Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lets-hope-liz-trusss-wild-strategy-helps-us-weather-this-winter-lnjrwgrqm.

  26. Bark if you don’t like deficits. 2016. The Economist https://www.economist.com/united-states/2014/01/23/bark-if-you-dont-like-deficits.

  27. Vergas, Ramon Antonio. 2022. Biden says everybody should be concerned about spread of monkeypox. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/22/biden-monkeypox-infections-spread.

  28. Ting, Eric. 2022. What Gavin Newsom ending California’s COVID state of emergency really means. SFGATE. https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/newsom-ending-state-of-emergency-17516929.php.

  29. Follow the yellow brick road. 2010. Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/04d02566-dbec-11df-af09-00144feabdc0.

  30. Suciu, Peter. 2021. What if Donald Trump Had Run for President as a Democrat? The National Interest https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/what-if-donald-trump-had-run-president-democrat-179408.

  31. Shormani, Mohammed Q., Mohammed Ali Qarabesh. 2018. Vocatives: correlating the syntax and discourse at the interface. Cogent Arts and Humanities 5(1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1469388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Now for the hard part. 2020. : EU-U.K. trade talks to be complicated. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/brexit-aftermath-1.5448801.

  33. Brockbank, Max. 2003. Ladies and Gentlemen – We Got Him! Time https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,561438,00.html.

  34. Forms of applications in English. 2022. https://jak.koshachek.com/articles/formi-zvertannja-v-anglijskij.html.

  35. Ting, Eric, and Amy Graff. 2021. and Cat Ferguson. Vaccinated? You can stop worrying about omicron. SFGATE. https://www.sfgate.com/coronavirus/article/omicron-vaccine-protection-hospital-COVID-immune-16703994.php.

  36. Britain faces up to Brexit. 2017. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/07/22/britain-faces-up-to-brexit.

  37. Aleksanyan, Heghine. 2020. Propaganda as a language of communication. https://enlightngo.org/language/en/post/17821.

  38. Hinde, Simon. 2017. Brexit and the media. Dans Hermes 77: 80–86. https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.077.0080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Forest, James. 2021. Political warfare and propaganda an introduction forest. Journal of Advanced Military Studies 12: 13–33. https://doi.org/10.21140/mcuj.20211201001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Adnan, Zahraa. 2022. The function of Phatic Communication in the English Language. English Language Literature and Culture 7(2): 62–65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20220702.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shmatkovska, Tetiana, Korobchuk Tetiana. 2023. Modern information and communication technologies in the modeling of business processes. Economic Forum 1(3): 156–161. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2023-3-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaisha Ramberdiyeva.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramberdiyeva, G., Dildabekova, A., Abikenova, Z. et al. The Functional and Semantic Category of Appeal as a Linguistic Tool in Political Propaganda Texts (in the Example of the English Language). Int J Semiot Law (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10115-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10115-5

Keywords

Navigation