Skip to main content
Log in

Vietnam’s Regulation on Intellectual Property Rights Protection: The Context of Digital Transformation

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vietnam is home to a prospering technology community and numerous enterprises that range from small start-ups to development giants. Virtually all public services are offered online. In fact, the country even has a system for e-residency and “data embassies.” This achievement derives in part from the nation’s transparent and enduring political preferences, but more importantly from Vietnamese law and its regulatory system regarding information, the digital general public, and intellectual property rights (IPR) protection. In this examination of the most pertinent aspects of Vietnam’s digital economy legislation, this study explores the nation’s regulatory structure regarding copyright and patents within the context of digital transformation. The study discusses the relationship between foreign and national regulations in terms of IPR protection and the advancement of digitalization. Research on Vietnamese regulations and the practical application of major patent and copyright regulations has revealed that in many respects, the nation is highly reliant on the effective operation of a broader foreign institutional and legal framework. Thus, in the near future, technological advancement will necessitate the establishment of additional transnational regulatory systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Notes

  1. “Law on Cyber Information Security No 86/2015/QH13,” 2015, https://www.dataguidance.com/legal-research/law-cyber-information-security-no-862015qh13.

  2. “Law No 62/2006/QH11 on Cinematography,” 2006, https://www.dataguidance.com/legal-research/law-no-622006qh11-cinematography.

  3. Civil Code and the Law on Cyberinformation Security and Law on Electronic Transactions and the Law on Telecommunications, “Vietnam—Data Protection Overview,” n.d., https://www.dataguidance.com/notes/vietnam-data-protection-overview.

  4. Association of Southeast Asian Nations, "ASEAN Digital Integration Framework Action Plan 2019–2025," 2019, https://asean.org/asean2020/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ASEAN-Digital-Integration-Framework-Action-Plan-DIFAP-2019-2025.pdf.

  5. Association of Southeast Asian Nations, "ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025," 2021, https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ASEAN-Digital-Masterplan-EDITED.pdf.

  6. "Decree No. 131/2013/ND-CP of October 16, 2013, on Sanctioning Administrative Violations of Copyright and Related Rights," 2013, https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/585385.

References

  1. Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam. 2020. Viet Nam’s Intellectual property strategy until 2030: Driving force for development of intellectual property assets. https://www.most.gov.vn/en/news/753/viet-nam’s-intellectual-property-strategy-until-2030--driving-force-for-development-of-intellectual-property-assets.aspx. Accessed 19 October 2022.

  2. Cameron, A., T.H. Pham, J. Atherton, D.H. Nguyen, T.P. Nguyen, S.T. Tran, T.N. Nguyen, H.Y. Trinh, S. Hajkowicz. 2019. Vietnam’s future digital economy—towards 2030 and 2045. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane. https://data.opendevelopmentmekong.net/dataset/fd853b31-f750-4862-908c-1bcc65a44609/resource/92254144-508f-406c-b01a-d7bc94ef5b46/download/18-00566_data61_report_vietnamsfuturedigitaleconomy2040-v2_english_web_1...-1.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2022.

  3. United Nations. 2022. UN E-Government survey 2022. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2022-09/Web version E-Government 2022.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2022.

  4. Watkins J, N. Quang Trung, M. Nkhoma, V.K. Thien, N. Le Hoang Lon. 2021. Digital transformation in Vietnam: The SME and SOE Experience. https://www.rmit.edu.vn/content/dam/rmit/vn/en/assets-for-production/images/code/digital-transformation-in-vietnam-the-sme-and-soe-experience-/CODE-Digital-Transformation-whitepaper-ENG.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2022.

  5. Menell P.S., M.A. Lemley, R.P. Mergers. 2022. Intellectual property in the new technological age 2022. Volume I: Perspectives, trade secrets and patents. Clause 8 Publishing.

  6. Walsh, K., A. Wallace, M. Pavis, N. Olszowy, J. Griffin, and N. Hawkins. 2021. Intellectual property rights and access in crisis. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 52: 379–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01041-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kronblad, C. 2020. How digitalization changes our understanding of professional service firms. Academy of Management Discoveries 6: 436–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronblad, C. 2020. Digital innovation in law firms: The dominant logic under threat. Creative Innovation Management 29 (3): 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kronblad, C., and J.E. Pregmark. 2019. Beyond digital inventions—diffusion of technology and organizational capabilities to change. In Legal tech, smart contracts and blockchain, ed. M. Corrales, M. Fenwick, and H. Haapio, 123–146. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed, R.K., K.H. Muhammed, A.O. Qadir, S.I. Arif, S. Lips, K. Nyman-Metcalf, I. Pappel, and D. Draheim. 2021. A legal framework for digital transformation: A proposal based on a comparative case study. In Electronic government and the information systems perspective, ed. A. Kö, E. Francesconi, G. Kotsis, A.M. Tjoa, and I. Khalil, 115–128. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86611-2_9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sidorenko, E.L., and P.V. Arx. 2020. Transformation of law in the context of digitalization: Defining the correct priorities. Digital Law Journal 1: 24–38. https://doi.org/10.38044/DLJ-2020-1-1-24-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vo H. 2016. Hanoi to roll out free, city-wide Wi-Fi. VnExpress. https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/hanoi-to-roll-out-free-city-wide-wi-fi-3448075.html. Accessed 15 October 2022.

  13. World Bank Group and Ministry of Planning and Investment of Vietnam. 2016. Vietnam 2035: Toward prosperity, creativity, equity, and democracy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriguez, R. 2020. Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology 4: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nadel, M.S. 2004. How current copyright law discourages creative output: The overlooked impact of marketing. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 19: 785–856.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karjala, D.S. 2008. Copyright and creativity. UCLA Entertainment Law Review 15: 169–201. https://doi.org/10.5070/LR8152027112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruth, T. 2006. Copyright and creativity: Cultural economics for the 21st century. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 3 (2): 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Natasha, J. M. Bartley. 2019. The digital economy in southeast Asia: Strengthening the foundations for future growth. World Bank, Washington DC. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/328941558708267736/pdf/The-Digital-Economy-in-Southeast-Asia-Strengthening-the-Foundations-for-Future-Growth.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2023.

  19. Bianchi, A., and A. Peters. 2013. Cross-cutting issues. In Transparency in international law, ed. A. Bianchi and A. Peters, 417–607. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Nyagadza, B., R. Pashapa, A. Chare, G. Mazuruse, and P.K. Hove. 2022. Digital technologies, fourth industrial revolution (4IR)\& global value chains (GVCs) nexus with emerging economies’ future industrial innovation dynamics. Cogent Economics & Finance 10: 2014654. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2014654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gauci I. 2019. Digital economy and the 4th industrial revolution. GTG Advocates. https://gtg.com.mt/digital-economy-and-the-4th-industrial-revolution/. Accessed 10 October 2022

  22. Liang C. 2014. Analysis of cloud computing patent holders. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/cloud-computing/2014/03/17/analysis-of-cloud-computing-patent-holders/.

  23. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2020. World intellectual property indicators 2020. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2020.pdf. Accessed 18 October 2022

  24. Guide to the International Patent Classification. 2020. Geneva: World intellectual property organization. 1–51. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_guide_ipc_2020.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Vietnam.

Funding

This work was funded by the Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology (PTIT), Vietnam (Decision no. 359.8/QĐ-HVCS, Date 06 August 2023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NNAD, VPN, and BKH performed the measurements. NNAD, VPN, and BKH were involved in planning and supervising the work. NNAD, VPN, and BKH processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript, and designed the figures. NNAD, VPN, and BKH performed the study calculations. NNAD, VPN, and BKH aided in interpreting the results and worked on the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published. They agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Vietnam (Date 11 November 2019/No. 951/QĐ-HV).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, D.N.A., Nguyen, V.P. & Bui, K.H. Vietnam’s Regulation on Intellectual Property Rights Protection: The Context of Digital Transformation. Int J Semiot Law 37, 259–278 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10076-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10076-1

Keywords

Navigation