Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies disciplinary differences in citation impacts of different types of co-publishing. The citation impacts of international, domestic inter-organizational and domestic intra-organizational co-publications, and single-authored publications, are compared. In particular, we examine the extent to which the number of authors explains the potential differences in citation impacts when compared to the influence of different types of international and domestic collaborations. The analysis is based on Finland’s publications in Thomson Reuters Web of Science database in 1990–2008. Finland is a small country, thus, it has fewer opportunities to find collaborators inside own country when compared to larger countries. Finland’s science policy has underlined internationalization and research collaboration as key means to increase the quality and impact of Finnish research. This study indicates that both international and domestic co-publishing have steadily increased during the past two decades in all disciplinary groups. International co-publications gain on average more citations than domestic co-publications. In natural sciences and engineering, co-authorship explains only a small proportion of variability in publications’ citation rates. When the effect of the number of authors is taken into account there are no big differences in citation impacts between international and domestic co-publications. However, international co-publications by ten authors or more gather significantly more citations than other publications. In humanities, the difference in citation impacts between co-authored publications in relation to single-authored publications is significant. However, international co-publications are not on average more highly cited in relation to domestic co-publications in humanities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). A more research-intensive and integrated European Research Area. Science, Technology and Competitiveness. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish Ministry of Education. (2004). Management and Steering of Higher Education in Finland. Publications from the Finnish Ministry of Education 2004:20.

  • Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. (2012). Report from the Finnish Citation Index Working Group II. Finnish research organizations’ publications and citations in the Web of Science, 1990–2009. Publications from the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture 2018:18.

  • Frame, J., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘Periphery Effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossart, C., & Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakala, J. (1998). Internationalisation of Science: Views of the Scientific Elite in Finland. Science Studies, 11(1), 52–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbertz, H. (1995). Does it pay to Cooperate? A bibliometric case-study in molecular-biology. Scientometrics, 33(1), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H.-M., & Nieminen, M. (2009). Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: a comparison of five countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J., & Huang, D. (2011). Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics, 86(2), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S. (2012). Scale-Independent Measures: Theory and Practice. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, September 5–8, Montreal, Canada.

  • Katz, J., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukonen, E., Miettinen, M., Piirainen, T., Puuska, H.-M., & Vuolanto, P. (2009). Internationalisation of university research: Practices and problems, in: Ahonen, P.-P., Hjelt, M., Kaukonen, E., & Vuolanto, P. (Eds), Internationalisation of Finnish scientific research. Publications of the Academy of Finland 7/09, pp. 91–122.

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Kyvik, S. (1991). Productivity in academia: Scientific publishing at Norwegian universities. Rådet for samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning, NAVF.

  • Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2010). What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines? Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2001). Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7–8), 762–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, J. (2007). Lifting the crown: Citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H., de Bruin, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhonen, R., Puuska, H.-M., & Leino, Y. (2012). International co-publishing in Finland. Reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2012:19.

  • Must, U. (2012). Alone or together: Examples from history research. Scientometrics, 91(2), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., & Visser, M. S. (2004). Qualitative deconstructions of citation impact indicators. Waxing field impact but waning journal impact. Journal of Documentation, 60(6), 668–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NordForsk. (2010). International Research Cooperation in the Nordic countries. A Publication from the NORIA-net “The Use of bibliometrics in research policy and evaluation activities”.

  • OECD. (2012). Main Science and Technology Indicators. Key Figures. Volume 2012/1. OECD.

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Luukkonen, T., & Hälikkä, S. (2000). A bibliometric study of Finnish science. VTT, Group for Technology Studies Working Papers No. 48/00.

  • Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19(1–2), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics, 83(1), 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. (1997). Science as an international enterprise. Science and Public Policy, 24(5), 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results: Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tampere, Kanslerinrinne 1, 33014, Tampere, Finland

    Hanna-Mari Puuska & Reetta Muhonen

  2. CSC - IT Centre for Science, P.O. Box 405, 02101, Espoo, Finland

    Hanna-Mari Puuska & Yrjö Leino

Authors
  1. Hanna-Mari Puuska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reetta Muhonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yrjö Leino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna-Mari Puuska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puuska, HM., Muhonen, R. & Leino, Y. International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines. Scientometrics 98, 823–839 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation