Skip to main content
Log in

The theory and function of Marxian water rent in the United States

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marx’s theory of ground rent has been widely used to help understand the trinity of land, labor, and capital. However, limited attention has been paid to the role of water within the Marxian rent framework. This lack of attention proves troubling due to the role of surface waters as an essential means of production throughout capitalism. Here I restate Marxian ground rent in the form of water rent and discuss the function of water-rent in the two dominant surface water rights doctrines of the United States—the riparian doctrine and the doctrine of prior appropriation. In doing so, I revise the distinction between differential rent 1 and differential rent 2 to provide more analytically useful categories. Paying special attention to issues of drought and scarcity, I fully articulate the function of Marxian rent and its four forms for both surface water rights doctrines, while clearly stating where they do and do not differ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. B. (2019). Class Monopoly Rent and the Redevelopment of Portland’s Pearl District. Antipode, 51(4), 1035–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arboleda, M., & Purcell, T. F. (2021). The Turbulent Circulation of Rent: Towards a Political Economy of Property and Ownership in Supply Chain Capitalism. Antipode.

  • Bakker, K. J. (2003). A political ecology of water privatization. Studies in Political Economy, 70(1), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, M. (1980). On Marx’s theory of agricultural rent: A reply to Ben Fine. Economy and Society, 9(3), 304–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, V. (2014). Rent, real estate, and Flood mitigation in New Orleans East. Antipode, 46(4), 1014–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Q. (2023). Artificial scarcity in housebuilding and the impact on affordability: The return of absolute rent. Antipode, 55(4), 1110–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian-Smith, J., & Allen, L. (2012). Legal and institutional framework of water management. In J. Christian-Smith, & H. Peter (Eds.), A twenty-First Century U.S. Water Policy. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

  • Coronil, F. (1997). The magical state: Nature, money, and modernity in Venezuela. University of Chicago Press.

  • Davis, P. N. (1982). The Riparian Right of Streamflow Protection in the Eastern States. Ark L Rev, 36, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohew, Z. (2009). Property rights and western United States water markets. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economakis, G. E. (2003). On absolute rent: Theoretical remarks on Marx’s analysis. Science & Society, 67(3), 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economakis, G. E. (2006). On absolute rent: Reply. Science & Society, 70(3), 366–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. W. (1999a). On minimum rents: Part 1, Marx and absolute rent. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2111–2120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. W. (1999b). On minimum rents: Part 2, a modern interpretation. Urban Studies, 36(13), 2305–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (1979). On Marx’s theory of agricultural rent. Economy and Society, 8(3), 241–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (2019). Marx’s rent theory revisited? Landed property, nature and value. Economy and Society, 48(3), 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. H. (2012). The water of the United States. In Juliet Christian-Smith, H. Peter, & Gleick (Eds.), A twenty-First Century U.S. Water Policy. Oxford University Press.

  • Green, G. P., & Hamilton, J. R. (2000). Water allocation, transfers and conservation: Links between policy and hydrology. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 16(2), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1974). Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution. Regional Studies, 8(3–4), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to Capital. Verso Books. 2018 re-issue.

  • Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of Capital. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Harvey, D. (2017). Marx, capital, and the madness of economic reason. Oxford University Press.

  • Leonard, B., Costello, C., & Libecap, G. D. (2020). Expanding water markets in the western United States: Barriers and lessons from other natural resource markets. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

  • Loftus, A., March, H., & Purcell, T. F. (2019). The political economy of water infrastructure: An introduction to financialization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(1), e1326.

  • Marx, K. (1894:1981). Capital: Volume III. Penguin.

  • Purcell, T. F., Loftus, A., & March, H. (2020). Value–rent–finance. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandemose, J. (2006). Concerning absolute rent. Science & Society, 70(3), 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxowsky, D. (n.d.). Modifying a water right. Western Water Law Accessed at https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/ndwaterlaw/acquiringwater/westernlaw/modifyingright. Accessed on 1/24/2022.

  • Sherk, G. W. (2003). East meets West: A tale of two water doctrines. Water Resources Impact, 5(2), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. (2019). Instream flow rights within the prior appropriation doctrine: Insights from Colorado. Nat Resources J, 59, 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., & Aalbers, M. B. (2016). Virtual special issue editorial essay:‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory? Urban Studies, 53(9), 1760–1783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., & Whyte, K. P. (2020). Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States. Science of the Total Environment, 733, 137782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Governors Association. (2012). Water transfers in the West. Western Governors Association Report.

  • Wilchens, D. (2010). Agriculture water pricing: United States. Sustainable management of Water Resource in Agriculture. OECD Report.

  • Yrigoy, I. (2021). Strengthening the political economy of tourism: Profits, rents and finance. Tourism Geographies, 1–20.

Download references

Funding

No funding to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Tom Mueller.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure statement

Nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mueller, J.T. The theory and function of Marxian water rent in the United States. Theor Soc 53, 303–322 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09537-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09537-0

Keywords

Navigation