Abstract
This article discusses symmetry as an analytical tool for sociological analysis. Symmetry is presented as a property of social formations and a way to generate information about them through their mutual comparisons. The concept thus displaces the old dichotomy between individual and society. The latter forces to think in terms of wholes and parts, unduly limiting the possibilities at hand by keeping individuals as prisoners of societies, as it were. Symmetry opens the door for more alternatives by making room for more social formations at the same time. To develop this concept, the article turns to both Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and Harrison White’s network theory which are presented as enacting an “order from noise” approach (as opposed to an “order from order” approach). The article then reconstructs a whole spectrum going from social formations at a high level of symmetry to social formations at a low level of symmetry. At the first end, we have social formations like groups that define the identities of persons (or even define persons as identities). At the other end, we have entire functional sectors (like politics, science, law, economy, etc.) whose chief characteristic is to be asymmetric to each other (so that doing politics, for instance, is unlike doing science and vice-versa).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: A Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Azarian, G. R. (2005). The General sociology of Harrison C. White: Chaos and Order in Networks. Palgrave.
Baraldi, C., Corsi, G., & Esposito, E. (2021). Unlocking Luhmann. Bielefeld University Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of Naturalism. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Borch, C. (2011). Niklas Luhmann. Routledge.
Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/53.2.181
DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of History. Continuum.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press.
Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The Causal Power of Social Structures. Cambridge University Press.
Fontdevila, J., & White, H. C. (2013). Relational Power from switching across netdoms through reflexive and Indexical Language. In F. Dépelteau, & C. Powell (Eds.), Applying relational sociology (pp. 155–179). Palgrave.
Fontdevila, J., Opazo, M. P., & White, H. C. (2011). Order at the Edge of Chaos: Meaning from Netdom switching Across Functional Systems. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01393.x
Fuchs, S. (2001). Against Essentialism. Harvard University Press.
Fuhse, J. (2022). Social networks of communication and meaning. Oxford University Press.
Godart, F. C., & White, H. C. (2010). Switching under uncertainty: The coming and becoming of meanings. Poetics, 38, 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.09.003
Guy, J. S. (2018). Niklas Luhmann before relational sociology: The cybernetics roots of systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35, 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2523
Guy, J. S. (2019a). Problems and differentiation: A Deleuze-Luhmann encounter. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 26, 29–45.
Guy, J. S. (2019b). Theory beyond structure and Agency. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Guy, J. S. (2019c). Digital technology, digital culture and the metric/nonmetric distinction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 55–61.
Guy, J. S. (2020). Are relational processes teleological or self-referential? What relational sociology can learn from systems theory. Digithum, 26, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i26.374159
Heider, F. (2017). Médium et choses. Vrin.
Latour, B. (2013). An Enquiry into Modes of existence. Harvard University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of Society. Columbia University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1998). Love as passion. Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (2002). Theories of distinction. Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of Society, volume one. Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (2013a). Introduction to Systems Theory. Polity.
Luhmann, N. (2013b). Theory of Society, volume two. Stanford University Press.
Mische, A. & White, H. (1998). Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics across Network Domains. Social Research, 65(3), 695–724.
Porpora, D. (1989). Four Concepts of Social Structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19(2), 195–211.
Roth, S. (2013). Dying is only human: The case death makes for the immortality of the person. Tamara Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 11(2), 35–39.
Roth, S., Clark, C., Trofimov, N., Mkrtichyan, A., Heidingsfelder, M., Appignanesi, L., & Kaivo-Oja, J. (2017). Futures of a distributed memory. A global brain wave measurement (1800–2000). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 307–323.
Roth, S., Dahms, H. F., Welz, F., & Cattacin, S. (2019a). Print theories of computer societies. Introduction to the digital transformation of social theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, 119778.
Roth, S., Schwede, P., Valentinov, V., Žažar, K., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2019b). Big data insights into social macro trends (1800–2000): A replication study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, 119759.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press.
Simmel, G. (2009). Sociologies, Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms (two volumes) Brill.
Vandenberghe, F. (1999). The Real is Relational”: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s Generative Structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00064
Von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding. Springer-Verlag.
Von Foerster, H., & Broecker, M. (2010). Part of the World. University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.
Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society, two volumes. University of California Press.
White, H., Fuhse, J., Thiemann, M., & Buchholz, L. (2007). Networks and Meaning: Styles and Switchings. Soziale Systeme, 13(1–2), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2007-1-246
White, H. (2008). Identity and Control, 2nd edition Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Prof. Guy has sadly passed away last year.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guy, JS., Roth, S. What makes a difference? Symmetry as a sociological concept. Theor Soc 52, 947–964 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09519-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09519-2