Skip to main content
Log in

Resemblances of identity: Ludwig Wittgenstein and contemporary feminist legal theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a context in which there is manifest multiplicity in women’s daily lives, feminists have struggled to identify what it uniquely means to be a woman, without falling prey to charges of essentialism. Conscious, however, of the role which collective gender identity plays in providing coherence and motivation to feminist activity, a number of theorists have sought to find a way to retain group cohesion in the face of internal diversity. In this article, the merits and demerits of pre-existing attempts in this regard will be discussed. Having done so, an alternative approach, which builds on Wittgenstein’s concept of ‘family resemblances’, will be put forward and defended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa E. Munro.

Additional information

With the usual caveats, thanks to Sharon Cowan, Alan Norrie, John Stanton-Ife and John Tasioulas for their comments on an earlier version of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munro, V. Resemblances of identity: Ludwig Wittgenstein and contemporary feminist legal theory. Res Publica 12, 137–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-006-9000-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-006-9000-0

Keywords

Navigation