Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitators and barriers to writing instruction in Chile: teachers’ preparation and knowledge about teaching writing

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-eight fourth-through sixth-grade teachers (28 female; 10 male) in urban schools in Chile were interviewed to determine how teachers’ preparation to teach writing and their knowledge of how to do so acted as facilitators and/or barriers to classroom writing instruction. Teachers overwhelmingly identified their preservice preparation as a barrier to teaching writing, although several teachers viewed this mode of preparation as a facilitator. For teachers who expressed views about in-service and personal preparation as well as teaching experience, they almost unanimously indicated such modes of preparation facilitated classroom writing instruction. Teachers identified five forms of teaching knowledge that acted as facilitators and barriers to writing instruction. This included knowledge of how to differentiate writing instruction, assess writing, support the writing process, teach writing genres, and apply pedagogical teaching methods. A lack of instructional knowledge in each of these areas served as a barrier to classroom writing instruction, whereas knowledge about each acted as a facilitator. In addition, a lack of knowledge about how to teach fundamental writing skills acted as a barrier for some teachers. Implications and directions for future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors added the words on brackets to further clarification of the quotes.

References

  • Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. (2017). Informe de Resultados de Aprendizaje Escritura 2016. Sexto Básico [2016 Learning Outcomes Report Writing Sixth Grade]. http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/resultados_nacionales_escritura_2016.pdf

  • Ávila, N., & Jéldrez, E. (2015). Revelo sobre didáctica de la escritura 2015 [Exploration of Writing didactics 2015]. Appendix to the application form Project Fondef IT 15i10002, Chile.

  • Ávila Reyes, N., Figueroa, J., Navarro, F., Calle-Arango, L., Lagos, A., & Morales, S. (2022). ¿Formamos docentes que escriben? Oportunidades para escribir a través del currículum en Pedagogía en Educación Básica. [Do we train teachers on writing? Opportunities across the curriculum in elementary education programs]. Calidad En La Educación. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n56.1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañales, G., Ahumada, S., & Graham. S. (2022). Studying facilitators and barriers to writing instruction in Chile: Teachers’ views about the role of contextual and institutional factors on teaching writing [Manuscript submitted for publication].

  • Bañales, G., Ahumada, S., Graham, S., Puente, A., Guajardo, M., & Muñoz, I. (2020). Teaching writing in grades 4–6 in urban schools in Chile: A national survey. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(10), 2661–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10055-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C. (2016). What do social cultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write? In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 11–23). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Hayes, J. R. (2012). Longitudinal individual case studies of 20 children on writing treks in grades 1–5. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, research methods, tools, and applications (pp. 95–179). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2016). Third and fourth grade teachers’ classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, D. P., & León, Y. A. (2018). Miradas acerca del Simce Escritura: Analisis de los procesos de aplicación y manejo de los resultados en establecimientos particulares subvencionados [Perspectives on the Simce Escritura: Analysis of the application processes and management of the results in subsidized private schools.] [Master’s thesis, Universidad Andrés Bello].

  • Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on research and teacher education. American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Smedt, F., van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2016). Student, teacher, and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary school children’s writing performance. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 833–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2006). Children’s understanding of genre and writing development. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 131–143). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, M. J. (2018). Enseñanza de la escritura en la escuela: Qué, cómo y por qué enseñan así los docentes [Teaching writing at school: what, how and why teachers teach like this] [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Diego Portales].

  • Flores-Ferrés, M., Van Weijen, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2020). Teachers’ writing practices and contextual features in Grades 7–12 of Chilean public schools. Journal of Writing Research, 12(2), 365–417. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. W., Hull, G. A., Higgs, J. M., & Booten, K. P. (2016). Teaching writing in a digital and global age: Toward access, learning, and development for all. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1389–1450). American Educational Research Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, G., Sotomayor, C., Jéldrez, E., Bedwell, P. & Domínguez, A. M. (2016). Laproducción escrita de estudiantes y escuelas en base a resultados Simce, factores contextuales y modelos de buenas prácticas docentes [The written production of students and schools based on Simce results, contextual factors and models of best teaching practices]. Centro de Estudios Ministerio de Educación. https://centroestudios.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/100/2017/07/INFORME-FINAL-F911437.pdf.

  • Graham, S. (2018a). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53, 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 457–478). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2018b). A writer(s) within community model of writing. In C. Bazerman, V. Berninger, D. Brandt, S. Graham, J. Langer, S. Murphy, P. Matsuda, D. Rowe, & M. Schleppegrell (Eds.), The lifespan development of writing (pp. 271–325). National Council of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43, 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2022). Creating a classroom vision for teaching writing. The Reading Teacher, 75, 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing-to-read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9640-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/

  • Graham, S., Rouse, A. G., & Harris, K. R. (2018). Scientifically supported writing practices. In A. O’Donnell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Educational Psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199841332.013.40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (in Press). Writer(s)-Within-Community model of writing as a lens for studying the teaching of writing. In R. Horrowitz (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of international research on writing (Vol. II). Routledge.

  • Graham, S., Ahumada, S., Bañales, G., Puente, A., Guajardo, M., & Muñoz, I. (2022). Intermediate grade teachers’ adaptations for weaker writers: A national survey in urban schools in Chile. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420941795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., Hutchinson, A., & White, K. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions about the Common Core State Standards. Journal of Research in Education, 25(1), 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harward, S., Peterson, N., Korth, B., Wimmer, J., Wilcox, B., Morrison, T., Black, S., Simmerman, S., & Pierce, L. (2014). Writing instruction in elementary classrooms: Why teachers engage or do not engage students in writing. Literacy Research & Instruction, 53, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2014.896959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessment control learning. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, T. P., & Graham, S. (2016). Teaching writing in grades 4–6 in urban schools in the Greater China Region. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 869–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9597-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, R. (2001). Making the most of college. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. Examining pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpique, A. A., Valcan, D., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Ledger, S. (2022). Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: A national survey. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10294-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, S., & Ro, Y. (2011). Approaches to writing instruction. Pedagogies: an International Journal, 6, 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2011.604902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, D., Brindle, M., Harris, K., Graham, S., Collins, A., & Brown, M. (2016). Illuminating growth and struggles using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating SRSD instruction in writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(6), 1105–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9627-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Educación. (2015). Hacia un sistema completo y equilibrado de la evaluación de los aprendizajes en Chile. Informe Equipo de Tarea para la Revisión del Simce. [Toward a complete and balanced system of learning assessment in Chile. A report of committee for revision Simce]. https://www.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2015/11/Informe-Equipo-de-Tarea-Revisi%C3%B3n-Simce.pdf

  • Ministerio de Educación. (2017). Estadísticas de la Educación 2016 [Statistics of Education 2016] Centro de Estudios Ministerio de Educación de Chile. https://centroestudios.mineduc.cl/wp-ontent/uploads/sites/100/2017/07/Anuario_2016.pdf

  • Ministerio de Educación. (2018). Bases Curriculares Primer a Sexto Básico [Curricular Standards First to Sixth Grade]. https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/614/articles-22394_bases.pdf

  • Murphy, P. K., Firetto, C. M., & Li, M. (2018). Knowledge and the model of domain learning. In H. Fives & D. L. Dinsmore (Eds.), The model of domain learning: Understanding the development of expertise (pp. 19–36). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J., Scales, R. Q., Grisham, D. L., Wolsey, T. D., Dismuke, S., Smetana, L., Yoder, K. K., Ikpeze, C., Ganske, K., & Martin, S. (2016). What about writing: A national exploratory study of writing instruction in teacher preparation programs. Literacy Research & Instruction, 55, 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1198442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education.

  • Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/6781/

  • Parr, J. M., & Jesson, R. (2016). Mapping the landscape of writing instruction in New Zealand primary school classrooms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 981–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9589-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, A., Parsons, S., Morewood, A., & Ankrum, J. (2016). Barriers to change: Findings from three literacy professional learning initiatives. Literacy Research & Instruction, 55(4), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1193575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Jassen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 640–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, L. (2018). Literacy. Our World in Data.

  • Ryan, M., Khosronejad, M., Barton, G., Kervin, L., & Myhill, D. A. (2021). Reflexive approach to teaching writing: Enablements and constraints in primary school classrooms. Written Communication, 38(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211005558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Martín, E., Domínguez, M., Taut, S., & Hurtado, C. (2014). Simce de lectura: ¿motor de la mejora escolar? Elaboración de instrumento para estudiar las estrategias implementadas por las escuelas [Simce reading: school improvement engine? Development of a tool to study the strategies implemented by schools]. https://centroestudios.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/100/2017/07/F811385-Informe-Final-San-Martin-UC-1.pdf

  • Santiago, P., Fiszbeu, A., Jaramillo, S., & Radinger, T. (2017). OECD reviews of school resources: Chile 2017. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285637-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmerman, S., Harward, S., Pierce, L., Peterson, N., Morrison, T., Korth, B., Billen, M., & Shumway, J. (2012). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of process writing. Literacy Research & Instruction, 51(4), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2011.557764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotomayor, C., Jéldrez, E., & Osorio, G. (2021). School writing in Chile: Standards and research evidence. In J. V. Jeffery & J. M. Parr (Eds.), International perspectives on writing curricula and development (pp. 37–57). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sotomayor, C., Parodi, G., Coloma, C., Ibáñez, R., & Cavada, P. (2011). La formación inicial de docentes de Educación General Básica en Chile. ¿Qué se espera que aprendan los futuros profesores en el área de Lenguaje y Comunicación? [Initial training for Primary School teachers. What do we expect future teachers to learn about Language and Communication?]. Pensamiento Educativo: Revista De Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 48(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.7764/pel.48.1.2011.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolchinsky, L. (2016). From text to language and back again: The emergence of written language. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 144–159). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, S. K., & Hui, S. Y. (2016). Chinese writing curriculum reforms in Hong Kong in recent years and their impact on teaching and learning. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9595-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2015). Logros de aprendizaje. Tercer Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo [Learning achievements Third Regional Comparative and Explanatory Study]. Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe (OREALC). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243532

  • Veiga Simão, A. M., Malpique, A. A., Frison, L. M. B., & Marques, A. (2016). Teaching writing to middle school students in Portugal and in Brazil: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 955–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9606-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K. M., Hall, A. H., & Barrett-Tatum, J. (2016). Investigating what matters for writing instruction in South Carolina elementary schools: Teachers’ perceptions of effective writing strategies and barriers to implementation. Reading Matters, 16, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Consejo Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT) Fondecyt Regular No. 1171898.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

    Silza Ahumada, Gerardo Bañales & María Lidia Torres

  2. Division of Educational Leadership & Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA

    Steve Graham

Authors
  1. Silza Ahumada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerardo Bañales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steve Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. María Lidia Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Graham.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahumada, S., Bañales, G., Graham, S. et al. Facilitators and barriers to writing instruction in Chile: teachers’ preparation and knowledge about teaching writing. Read Writ 36, 1867–1899 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10380-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10380-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation