Abstract
In this study, an intervention program was designed based on the instructional principles of self-regulated learning (SRL), and its effectiveness in enhancing Hong Kong secondary three students’ classical Chinese (CC) reading comprehension and motivation was evaluated. A pretest–posttest treatment–control group quasi-experimental design was used. During the study, 191 students between the ages of 13 and 16 years were assigned to three groups and received different treatments: in the experimental group (EG), teachers implemented all the instructional practices designed based on SRL instructional principles in the intervention package; in the control group (CG1), teachers used the traditional teacher-centered approach to teach the same instructional materials from the intervention program; and in the baseline control group (CG2), teachers adopted traditional teacher-centered, text-based instruction to teach the CC texts in students’ original textbook. Reading comprehension tests, questionnaires, and interviews were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. The findings indicated that the EG and CG1 students had significantly better CC reading comprehension performance and prior knowledge than the CG2 students. The EG students also showed positive attitudes towards the intervention program. Implications of the findings are discussed to provide insights into the potential applicability of SRL instruction in the Chinese context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Hong Kong, all secondary students are categorized into three bands under the Secondary School Place Allocation system. The calculation of allocating bands is based on students’ standardized internal assessment results in Grades 5 and 6. According to these scores, the highest, moderate, and lowest 33.3% of students are classified into Bands 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The two schools involved in the study mainly admitted Band 2 students who are moderate-achieving students.
References
Afflerbach, P. P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31–46.
Anderson, R. C. (1994). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 469–482). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Andrzejewski, C. E., Davis, H. A., Bruening, P. S., & Poirier, R. R. (2016). Can a self-regulated strategy intervention close the achievement gap? Exploring a classroom-based intervention in 9th grade earth science. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 85–99.
Baker, L. (2005). Developmental differences in metacognition: Implications for metacognitively oriented reading instruction. In S. E. Israel, et al. (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 61–79). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231.
Chen, Y. Z. (2013). Lun gaozhong wenyanwen yuedu jiaoxue zhong cunzai de wenti ji jiejue duice [Problems and solutions for senior secondary classical Chinese reading instruction]. Xinkecheng (Zhongxue), 2013(10), 208–209.
Cheng, B. L. (2001). The relations among motivation, goal setting, action control, and learning strategies: The construct and verification of self-regulated learning process model. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 46, 67–92.
Chi, L. C., & Chiou, G. F. (2015). Wenyanwen yuedu lijie lichen tanjiu [The comprehension process of reading Classic Chinese texts]. Huayuwen Jiaoxue Yanjiu, 12(2), 51–74.
Cleary, T. J., Velardi, B., & Schnaidman, B. (2017). Effects of the self-regulation empowerment program (SREP) on middle school students’ strategic skills, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 64, 28–42.
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 127–157.
Dignath, C., Büttner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.
Dörrenbächer, L., & Perels, F. (2016). Self-regulated learning profiles in college students: Their relationship to achievement, personality, and the effectiveness of an intervention to foster self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 229–241.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., Jackson, W. P., Caprino, A. M., Oswald, C., & McVea, M. (2015). Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 111–128.
Greene, J. A., Freed, R., & Sawyer, R. K. (2019). Fostering creative performance in art and design education via self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 47, 127–149.
Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mobenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–420). New York, NY: Longman.
Han, X. P. (2001). Zai yuedu jiaoxue zhong peiyang xuesheng de yugan [Enhancing students’ language sense in reading instruction]. Zhongxue Yuwen Jiaoxue, 2001(6), 15–16.
Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulated through transactional strategies instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 51–75.
Horner, S. L., & Shwery, C. S. (2002). Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory into Practice, 41, 102–109.
Housand, A., & Reis, S. M. (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136.
Lau, K. L. (2004). Construction and initial validation of the Chinese Reading Motivation Questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 24, 845–865.
Lau, K. L. (2011). Collaborating with front-line teachers to incorporate self-regulated learning in Chinese language classes. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17, 47–66.
Lau, K. L. (2013). Chinese language teachers’ perception and implementation of self-regulated learning-based instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 56–66.
Lau, K. L. (2017). Classical Chinese reading instruction: Current practices and their relationship with students' strategy use and reading motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 175–186.
Lau, K. L. (2018). Language skills in classical Chinese text comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 139–157.
Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 93–103.
Lin, C. S., & Cheng, B. L. (1995). Studies on the relationship among students’ self-regulated factors and learning outcomes and on the effect of self-regulated reading comprehension training course. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 28, 15–58.
Lombaerts, K., Engels, N., & van Braak, J. (2009). Determinants to teachers’ recognitions of self-regulated learning practices in elementary education. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 163–173.
McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between adolescent’s reading skills, reading motivation and reading habits. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 545–569.
McInerney, D. M., & King, R. B. (2018). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 485–502). New York, NY: Routledge.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249.
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.
Peeters, J., De Backer, F., Kindekens, A., Triquet, K., & Lombaerts, K. (2016). Teacher differences in promoting students’ self-regulated learning: Exploring the role of student characteristics. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 88–96.
Perels, F., Guertler, T., & Schmitz, B. (2005). Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence. Learning and Instruction, 15, 123–139.
Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715–729.
Perry, N. E., & Rahim, A. (2011). Studying self-regulated learning in classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 122–136). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
Perry, N. E., & VandeKamp, K. O. (2000). Creating classroom contexts that support young children’s development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 821–843.
Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 31, 5–15.
Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & DeGroot, E. A. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139–161.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pulleyblank, E. G. (1995). Outline of Classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
Randi, J. (2004). Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 1825–1853.
Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Developing self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34–50). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Silva, M., & Cain, K. (2015). The relations between lower and higher level comprehension skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 321–331.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–1465.
Stoeger, H., Sontag, C., & Ziegler, A. (2014). Impact of a teacher-led intervention on preference for self-regulated learning, finding main ideas in expository texts, and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 799–814.
Tang, Z. Y., & Sun, L. J. (2013). Gaozhong wenyanwen yuedu zhiliang mubiao yanjiu zhiyi: Beijing ji laiyuan fenxi [A study on classical Chinese reading objectives instruction in senior secondary grades: Background and source analysis]. Yuwen Jiaoxue Tongxun, 10(2013), 7–9.
Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410–441.
Usher, E. L., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Social cognitive theoretical perspective of self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 19–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
van Grinsven, L., & Tillema, H. (2006). Learning opportunities to support student self-regulation: Comparing different instructional formats. Educational Research, 48, 77–91.
Vanderstoep, S. W., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362.
Wei, X. J. (2009). Chuzhong wenyanwen yuedu jiaoxue xianzhuang diaocha ji wenti pouxi [A survey and analysis on classical Chinese reading instruction in junior secondary grades]. Wenjiao Ziliao, 2009(4), 135–136.
Winnie, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27–47.
Xiong, J. P. (1993). Tantan zhongxue wenyanwen yuedu jiaoxue [Classical Chinese reading instruction in secondary schools]. Kecheng·Jiaocai·Jiaofa, 6, 10–15.
Zhang, S. L. (2005). Gudai hanyu jiaocheng [Course in classical Chinese]. Shanghai: Fudan Daxue Chubanshe.
Zhao, G. Q. (2004). Tushi lilun yu wenyanwen yuedu jiaoxue [Schema theory and classical Chinese reading instruction]. Wenjiao Ziliao, 2004(19), 115–119.
Zhou, Z. S. (2007). Wenyanwen yuedu qianyi nengli de tigao [Enhancing classical Chinese reading ability]. Yuwen Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu, 14, 44–45.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.
Zohar, A., & Peled, B. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low-and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18, 337–353.
Funding
This article is part of a research project funded by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC 14612517).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: A Sample lesson plan of the SRL intervention program designed for the experimental group
Grade level: secondary Three
Class: S.3B and S.3C (experimental group)
Module: module 1 “love between parents and children”
Lesson#: lesson 12–13 (100 min)
Topic: confucian filial piety
Knowledge and strategies learnt in previous lessons:
-
Basic principles of confucian filial piety
-
Eight types of CC word interpretation strategies
-
Reading comprehension strategies: integration strategy, concept map, and questioning strategy
-
Goal setting and monitoring strategies
Learning materials:
-
Two CC stories on the theme of confucian filial piety
-
Online news and videos reporting people who did not take care of or abuse their parents
-
Pre-class worksheet
-
Class activity worksheet
-
Peer assessment form
Lesson objectives:
-
Apply different word interpretation strategies to understand the meaning of words in the two stories
-
Apply the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas and themes of the two stories
-
Comment the behaviors of the sons in the two stories based on the principles of Confucian filial piety
-
Reflect the value and applicability of Confucian filial piety in modern society
Pre-class assignments: complete the pre-class worksheet --
-
Apply different word interpretation strategies to explain the meaning of words in the two stories
-
Watch the online news and videos.
Lesson structure:
Time (min) | Objectives | Learning activities (principles of SRL instructionala) |
---|---|---|
15 | Apply word interpretation strategies to explain the words in the two stories | Students share their answers of the pre |
Students’ answers are checked through group competition games. Each group has to explain what strategies they have used to guess the meanings of words in the two stories (SI-1, TN-4 & EP-12) | ||
Teacher gives feedbacks based on students’ performance on using the word interpretation strategies (TS-6) | ||
15 | Connect the principles of Confucian filial piety to students’ daily life | Teacher briefly reviews the basic principles of Confucian filial piety with students (SI-3) |
Teacher invites students to comment on the behaviors of the sons and daughters in the online news and video reports based on the principles of Confucian filial piety (TN-5 & TS-6) | ||
30 | Apply the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas and themes of the two stories | Students apply the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas and themes of the two stories in groups (SI-2, TN-4, & SA-10) |
Comment the behaviors of the sons in the two stories based on the principles of Confucian filial piety | ||
Radio broadcasting imitation activity | ||
Story telling program: Each group takes turn to use one sentence to summarize a main plot of the stories. At the end of the story, each group has to explain the implied moral meanings of the stories (TN-4 & EP-12) | ||
Phone-in program: Teacher plays the role of radio DJ and students play the role of phone-in audiences. Students are free to support or criticize the sons’ behaviors in the two stories. Teacher summarizes the students’ comments and does not make any judgement at this stage (TN-4 & SA-9) | ||
35 | Reflect the value and applicability of Confucian filial piety in modern society | Court imitation activity |
Each group plays the role of the son in one of the stories and discusses what reasons he might have for not treating his parent well (TN-4, SA-9, & SA-10) | ||
Teacher plays the role of judge and invites group representatives to make self-defense for their bad behaviors (SA-9) | ||
Other students play the role of jurors and fill in the peer assessment form to assess the performance of each group representatives based on the criteria provided in the form (EP-13 & EP-14) | ||
Teacher asks students to vote whether the sons in the two stories should be punished for their bad behaviors. Students are free to take their stance and give explanations for their votes (SA-9) | ||
Teacher concludes the activity by summarizing students’ explanations and encourages students to reflect whether we should adhere to the principles of Confucian filial piety and love our parents under different circumstances (TN-5 & TS-6) | ||
5 | Home assignments | |
Complete the self-assessment form to evaluate what you have learnt from the two CC stories (EP-14) | ||
Make a card to your parent to express your love and share your reflections in these two lessons to them (EP-12) |
Appendix 2: A sample lesson plan of the SRL intervention program designed for the control group 1
Grade level: secondary three
Class: S.3A and S.3D (control group 1)
Module: module 1 “love between parents and children”
Lesson#: Lesson 12–13 (100 min)
Topic: confucian filial piety
Knowledge and strategies learnt in previous lessons:
-
Basic principles of confucian filial piety
-
Eight types of CC word interpretation strategies
-
Reading comprehension strategies: integration strategy, concept map, and questioning strategy
Learning materials:
-
Two CC stories on the theme of confucian filial piety
-
Pre-class worksheet
-
In-class worksheet
-
Home assignment worksheet
Lesson objectives:
-
Apply different word interpretation strategies to understand the meaning of words in the two stories
-
Apply the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas and themes of the two stories
-
Understand the implied moral meanings of the two stories
-
Comment the behaviors of the sons in the two stories based on the principles of Confucian filial piety
Pre-class assignments: complete the pre-class worksheet
-
Apply different word interpretation strategies to explain the meaning of words in the two stories
-
Answer comprehension questions of the two stories.
Lesson structure:
Time (min) | Objectives | Learning activitiesa |
---|---|---|
15 | Apply word interpretation strategies to explain the words in the two stories | Teacher briefly reviews the eight word interpretation strategies with students |
Teacher asks students their answers of the word interpretation items in the pre-class worksheet. If a student’s answer is correct, teacher will ask him/her to explain what strategies he/she has used. If a student’s answer is wrong, teacher will explain the correct meaning to students and model how to use strategies to guess the meaning of that word | ||
25 | Apply word interpretation strategies to explain the words in the two stories | Teacher teaches the two CC stories word by word to students and explains how to use different strategies to interpret the meanings of each word in the stories |
25 | Apply the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas and themes of the two stories | Teacher briefly reviews the integration strategy with students |
Students apply the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas of the two stories by filling out the in-class worksheet. Teacher walks around and gives help to students who have questions on doing the worksheet | ||
Teacher asks students their answers of the worksheet. If a student’s answer is correct, teacher will ask him/her to explain how he/she summarize the main ideas of the stories. If a student’s answer is wrong, teacher will model how to use the integration strategy to summarize the main ideas | ||
15 | Understand the implied moral meanings of the two stories | Teacher questions students about the implied moral meanings of the two stories |
Teacher gives feedbacks to students’ answers and asks them to write down the themes of the two stories | ||
15 | Comment the behaviors of the sons in the two stories based on the principles of Confucian filial piety | Teacher briefly reviews the basic principles of Confucian filial piety with students |
Teachers asks students to comment the behaviors of the sons in the two stories based on the principles of Confucian filial piety | ||
Teachers gives feedbacks to students based on their comments and concludes it is an important tradition in Chinese culture to respect and take care of our parents | ||
5 | Home assignment worksheet: Text comprehension questions of the two CC stories |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lau, Kl. The effectiveness of self-regulated learning instruction on students’ classical Chinese reading comprehension and motivation. Read Writ 33, 2001–2027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10028-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10028-2