Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: a latent profile analysis

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By using latent profile analysis eight stable and interpretable subgroups of readers were identified. The basis for subgrouping was different performance measures with four aspects of reading in focus: reading of continuous texts, reading of document texts, word reading and reading speed. Participants were 9-year-old Swedish students included in the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Reading Literacy Study in 1991 (n = 4,184) and in 2001 (n = 5,099). The eight subgroups were compared on different background variables, such as gender, language at home, and cultural and socioeconomic factors. It was concluded that latent profile analysis proved to be a feasible methodology. The even performance profiles of good and average readers imply that reading is a skill with a high degree of transfer and generality. Several subgroups of poor readers with more heterogeneous performance patterns could be identified. The three most stable subgroups proved to be comprised of high performers, poor comprehenders and dyslexic students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, P. G., Joshi, M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. (2002). Reading, syntactic, orthographic, and working memory skills of bilingual Arabic-English speaking Canadian children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balke, G. (1995, April). Decomposition of reading comprehension. Analysis of the IEA Reading Literacy tests. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, USA.

  • Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental psychology, 24, 560–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of reading related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1975). Methods and results in the IEA studies of effects of school and learning. Review of Educational Research, 45, 355–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, P. (1986). Systematic classroom observation. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Fontoura, H., & Siegel, L. (1995). Reading, syntactic, and working memory skills of bilingual Portuguese-English Canadian children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, D., & Hoshko, I. (1977). Classification of reading problems by the Q-technique of factor analysis. Cortex, 13, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elley, W. B. (1992). How in the world do students read?. The Hague: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elley, W. B. (Ed.). (1994). The IEA study of Reading Literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems. International studies in educational achievement. Great Britain, Exeter: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everatt, J., Smythe, I., Adams, E., & Ocampo, D. (2000). Dyslexia screening measures and bilingualism. Dyslexia, 6, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, U. (2002). Reading skills among students of immigrant origin in Stockholm. Stockholm: Institute of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, N., & Frith, U. (1998). Identifying dyslexia in bilingual children: A phonological approach with inner London Sylheti speakers. Dyslexia, 4, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1997). Brain, mind and behaviour in dyslexia. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia. Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 1–19). London: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1999). Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 5, 192–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German and English speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. (1995). The new literacy: Caveat emptor. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: An update on genes, brains, and environments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 91–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E. (1995, April). Alternative hierarchical models of reading achievement. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, USA.

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., & Rosén, M. (2003, August). The dimensional structure of reading assessment tasks in the IEA Reading Literacy Study 1991 and the progress in International Reading Literacy Study 2001. Paper Presented at the EARLI 10th Biennal Conference in Padova, Italy.

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., & Rosén, M. (2004). The IEA 10-Year trend Study of Reading Literacy: A multivariate reanalysis. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., Rosén, M., & Myrberg, E. (2003). Förändringar i läskompetens 1991–2001. En jämförelse över tid och länder [Changes in competence of reading. A comparison over time and countries]. Sweden: Skolverket.

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., & Stahl, P-A. (2001). STREAMS User’s guide, Version 2.5 for Windows95/98/NT. Mölndal, Sweden: Multivariate Ware.

  • Høien, T., & Lundberg, I. (2000). Dyslexia. From theory to intervention. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K. (2001). Word recognition deficits in German: More evidence from a representative sample. Dyslexia, 7, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I. (1985). Longitudinal studies of reading and writing difficulties in Sweden. In G. E. McKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 65–105). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I. (1999). Towards a sharper definition of dyslexia. In I. Lundberg, F. E. Tonnessen, & I. Austad (Eds.), Dyslexia. Advances in theory and practice (pp. 9–29). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., & Olofsson, Å. (1981). Dyslexielevers sociala bakgrund (Social background of dyslexic students). Nordisk tidskrift för specialpedagogok, 59, 203–213.

  • Manis, F., Seidenberg, M., Doi, L., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller Guron, L. (2004). First and second language rapid naming speed and word recognition automaticity. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Miller Guron, L., & Lundberg, I. (2003). Identifying dyslexia in multilingual students: Can phonological awareness be identified in the majority language?. Journal of research in Reading, 26, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. D., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Lyon, G. R., Shankweiler, D. P., et al. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., & Diethelm, K. (2001). The contribution of phonological skills and letter knowledge to early reading development in a multilingual population. Language learning, 51, 187–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus user’s guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulesu, E., Frith, U., Snowling, M., Gallagher, A., Morton, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., et al. (1996). Is developmental dyslexia a disconnection syndrome? Evidence from PET scanning. Brain, 119, 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F. (2004). The neural basis of reading acquisition. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 815–824). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F. (2006). A neurological model of dyslexia and other domain-specific developmental disorders with an associated sensorimotor syndrome. In G. D. Rosen (Ed.), The dyslexic brain: New pathways in neuroscience discovery (pp. 75–101). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, S., & Lundberg, I. (2003). The impact of environmental factors on components of reading and dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satz, P., & Morris, R. (1981). Learning disability subtypes: A review. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neoropsychological and cognitive processes in reading. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Lacert, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2000). On subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from processing time and accuracy scores. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS. (1999). SPSS Base 10.0, user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, I., & Jacobsson, C. (2005). How persistent are phonological difficulties? A longitudinal study of reading retarded children. Dyslexia, 12, 3–20.

  • Tierney, R. (1998). Literacy assessment reform: Shifting beliefs, principled possibilities, and emerging practices. Reading Teacher, 51, 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagemaker, H., Taube, K., Munck, I., Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides, G., & Martin, M. (1996). Are girls better readers? Gender differences in reading literacy in 32 countries. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. M., & Lesaux, N. K. (2001). Persistence of phonological processing deficits in college students with dyslexia who have age-appropriate reading skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, U. (2009). Phonological and surface subtypes among dyslexic university students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56.

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Goldberg O’Rourke, A., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, U., & Lundberg, I. (2003). A technique for group screening of dyslexia among adults. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 324–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2003). Measuring socio-economic status at individual and collective levels. A cross-country comparison (Gothenburg Studies in Educational Science, Vol. 193). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgenis.

  • Yang, Y., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2004). Measuring socioeconomic status at individual and collective levels. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 259–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, G. W., Pollard, J., & Mercuri, A. (1993). The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language. Applied psycholinguistics, 14, 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was a part of the SALS project (Studier Av Läsfärdigheten i Sverige) financed by the Swedish Research Council. I wish to thank Professor Jan-Eric Gustafsson and Professor Ingvar Lundberg for their guidance and helpful advice during varying stages of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Gothenburg, Box 300, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden

    Ulrika Wolff

Authors
  1. Ulrika Wolff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrika Wolff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolff, U. Subgrouping of readers based on performance measures: a latent profile analysis. Read Writ 23, 209–238 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9160-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9160-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation