Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Daily Teacher Feedback on Subsequent Motivation and Mental Health Outcomes in Fifth Grade Students: a Person-Centered Analysis

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevention scientists recognize that implementing effective prevention practices and programs responsive to the needs of individuals but based solely upon the findings from variable-centered methods presents several limitations due to numerous risk factors, pathways, and unobserved influences. One such understudied influence that is masked by variable-centered methods, motivation, is a person-level characteristic that influences treatment outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the use of an alternative person-centered approach, group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME), to model change over time that focuses on the interdependence of daily student motivation levels and teacher feedback and their relations to student outcomes over time. Specifically, we used GIMME to model person level responses to negative teacher feedback regarding students’ next day motivational ratings using data from 58 5th grade students participating in a study of the impact of the self-monitoring and regulation training strategy (SMARTS). Results identified a set of SMARTS students whose daily readiness aligned with high rates of self and teacher agreement regarding ongoing performance ratings. However, results identified a group of students whose daily motivation and readiness for change was adversely impacted by negative teacher feedback the day before. For these students, they were more likely than their peers to experience high levels of depression and internalization scores. Motivationally oriented practice suggestions for providing feedback to students who may be sensitive to this type of feedback and research implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology, 54, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltz, A. M., & Gates, K. M. (2017). Network mapping with GIMME. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 789–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.

  • Boudreaux, E. D., Sullivan, A., Abar, B., Bernstein, S. L., Ginde, A. A., & Camargo, C. A. (2012). Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: A prospective observational examination of construct and predictive validity. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 7, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutelle, K. N., & Kirschenbaum, D. S. (2012). Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of successful weight control. Obesity Research, 6, 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, N. K. (2010). Child-report data and assessment of the social environment in schools. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731510391675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butryn, M. L., Phelan, S., Hill, J. O., & Wing, R. R. (2012). Consistent self-monitoring of weight: A key component of successful weight loss. Obesity, 15, 3091–3096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. Guilford Press

  • Cunningham, R. M., Chermack, S. T., Zimmerman, M. A., Shope, J. T., Bingham, C. R., Blow, F. C., & Walton, M. A. (2012). Brief motivational interviewing intervention for peer violence and alcohol use in teens: One-year follow-up. Pediatrics, 129, 1083–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 416–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Lembke, E. S., Magnusson, D., Callender, S. A., Windram, H., & Stachel, N. (2009). Developing a school-wide progress-monitoring system. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, E., Ritchey, K., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2010). School-based screening: A population-based approach to inform and monitor children’s mental health needs. School Mental Health, 2, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. B., Fenning, P., Kato, M. M., & McIntosh, K. (2014). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28.

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention. Exceptional Children, 73, 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, K., Reinke, W., Frey, A., & Shepard, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing in schools: Strategies for engaging parents, teachers, and students. Springer Publishing Company.

  • Hoza, B., Gerdes, A. C., Hinshaw, S. P., Arnold, L. E., Pelham Jr., W. E., Molina, B. S., et al. (2004). Self-perceptions of competence in children with ADHD and comparison children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, B., & Rasminsky, J. S. (2009). Challenging behavior in elementary and middle school. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

  • Kamphaus, R., & Reynolds, C. (2007). Behavioral & emotional screening system. NCS Pearson.

  • Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P. M., & Ernst, T. (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaBrie, J. W., Quinlan, T., Schiffman, J. E., & Earleywine, M. E. (2005). Performance of alcohol and safer sex change rulers compared with readiness to change questionnaires. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S. T., & Gates, K. M. (2017). Automated selection of robust individual-level structural equation models for time series data. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 768–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1309978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, S. T., Gates, K. M., Pike, H. K., Beltz, A. M., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data. Psychological Methods, 24, 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Viets, V., Walker, D. D., & Miller, W. R. (2002). What is motivation to change? A scientific analysis. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change: A guide to engagement in therapy. Chichester: WileyLütkepohl, H. (2005), New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer.

  • McNamara, E. (2009). Motivational interviewing: Theory, practice and applications with children and young people. Ainsdale: Merseyside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rose, G. S. (2009). Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. American Psychologist, 64, 527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. C. (2019). Granger causality testing with intensive longitudinal data. Prevention Science, 20, 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0919-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J. S., Goldfine, M. E., Evangelista, N. M., Hoza, B., & Kaiser, N. M. (2007). A critical review of self-perceptions and the positive illusory bias in children with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2006). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 10, 191–218. https://doi.org/10.7155/jgaa.00124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Martin, E. (2007). The effect of visual performance feedback on teacher behavior-specific praise. Behavior Modification, 31, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Merrell, K. (2008). The classroom check-up: A classwide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 37, 315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Sprick, R. (2011). Motivational interviewing for effective classroom management: The classroom check-up. Guilford press.

  • Reynolds, C. R., Kamphaus, R. W., & Vannest, K. J. (2011). Behavior assessment system for children (BASC). Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology, 366–371.

  • Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinadinovic, K., Berman, A. H., Hasson, D., & Wennberg, P. (2010). Internet-based assessment and self-monitoring of problematic alcohol and drug use. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 464–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2-8.

  • Thompson, A. (2014). Randomized trial of the self-management training and regulation strategy (STARS). Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 414–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A., & Webber, K. (2010). Realigning student and teacher perceptions of school rules: A behavior management strategy for students with challenging behaviors. Children & Schools, 32, 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedermann, W., Bergman, L. R., & von Eye, A. (2016). Development of methods for person-oriented research. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1-2, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2012). Achievement motivation. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–2.

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Roeser, R., & Schiefele, U. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. Child and adolescent development: An advanced course, 406–434.

  • Wright, A. G. C., Gates, K. M., Arizmendi, C., Lane, S. T., Woods, W. C., & Edershile, E. A. (2019). Focusing personality assessment on the person: Modeling general, shared, and person specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31, 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Preparation of this manuscript was supported by a grant from the US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (#R305A150517).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron M. Thompson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no other conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 104 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, A.M., Wiedermann, W., Herman, K.C. et al. Effect of Daily Teacher Feedback on Subsequent Motivation and Mental Health Outcomes in Fifth Grade Students: a Person-Centered Analysis. Prev Sci 22, 775–785 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01097-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01097-4

Keywords

Navigation