Abstract
Most major cities across the world today are facing an intractable challenge of financing public transport. In Kuala Lumpur for example, public transport services are somewhat poor in part because of the failure of major operators to secure ample funding. Previous funding programs implemented in the city have failed to produce a replicable model for financing public transport. Due to numerous financial problems and the dismal performance of privately owned transport firms, the State has in the recent past emerged as a key source of funding for the public transport sector in Kuala Lumpur. This article argues that, despite the insuperable challenges, prospects for the future funding of public transport in Kuala Lumpur appears to be good. The article also draws lessons from both Tokyo and Hong Kong. In order to address the funding deficit facing the public transport industry in the city it is crucial that more viable strategies and policies such as value capture and public–private sector partnerships are adopted by the urban authorities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong-Wright, A.: Urban transport—the World Bank’s view. In: Heraty, M.J. (ed.) Developing World Land Transport, pp. 302–305. Grosvenor Press International, London (1987)
Barter, P.A.: An international comparative perspective on urban transport and urban form in Pacific Asia: responses to the challenge of motorization in dense cities. Dissertation, Murdoch University, Australia (1999)
Barter, P.A.: Towards eastern Asia’s first automobile dependent city? Transport and space in the Klang Valley urban region. Paper presented at the third international Malaysian studies conference, UKM, Bangi, Malaysia, August 2001
Cullinane, S.: Hong Kong’s low car dependence: lessons and prospects. J. Transp. Geogr. 11, 25–35 (2003)
Jamilah, M., Kiggundu, A.T.: The rise of the private car in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: assessing the policy options. IATSS Res. J. 31, 1–9 (2007)
Kiggundu, A.T.: Urban development, public transport and sustainability: international experiences and options for Kuala Lumpur. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur (2005)
Luk, J., Olszewski, P.: Integrated public transport in Singapore and Hong Kong. Road Transp. Res. 12(4), 41–51 December (2003)
Matsumoto, N.: Environmentally friendly public transport planning. Manila Policy Dialogue on Environment and Transport, Manila, Philippines (2004)
Morichi, S.: Long term strategy for transport system in Asia megacities. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 6, 1–22 (2005)
Ninth Malaysia Plan, 2006–2010. National Printing Department, Kuala Lumpur (2006)
Pendakur, V.S.: Gridlock in the Slopopolis: congestion management and sustainable development. In: McGee, T.G., Robinson, I.M. (eds.) The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia, pp. 176–193. UCB Press, Vancouver (1995)
Poboon, C.: Coping with Bangkok’s traffic crisis: lesson From Japanese cities. Asia-Pacific Dev. Monit. 2, 67–79 (2000)
Priemus, H., Konings, R.: Light rail in urban regions: what Dutch policymakers could learn from experiences in France, Germany and Japan. J. Transp. Geogr. 9, 187–198 (2001)
Smith, J.J., Gihring, T.A.: Financing transit systems through value capture. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. (2004, submitted)
World Bank: Study on urban transport development. Final Report, Prepared by Padeco Ltd, Japan, August 2000
World Bank: Cities in the Move: A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review. Draft Document. World Bank, Washington, DC (2001)
World Bank: A Tale of Three Cities: Urban Rail Concessions in Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur and Manila. Final Report, Halcrow Group Limited, December (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kiggundu, A.T. Financing public transport systems in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: challenges and prospects. Transportation 36, 275–294 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9194-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9194-z