Skip to main content
Log in

Linking carbon and nitrogen mineralization with microbial responses to substrate availability — the DECONIT model

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulation of decomposition and inorganic nitrogen release in complex biogeochemical models can be based on different principles. A major problem is the link between carbon and nitrogen mineralization and a description of microbial growth dynamics in dependence of a suite of possible substrates. This contribution considers a first order decomposition model with several carbon pools and one nitrogen pool to investigate how the decomposition of plant types and mineralization of nitrogen is related to carbon quality. The model structure assumes that nitrogen is mobilised with the rate at which the lignin compounds decompose. The decomposition module is coupled with microbial dynamics by adjusted Michaelis Menten equations that relate microbial growth to the availability of various substrates. The model was calibrated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) applied to measured litter remnants, concentrations of lignin, cellulose and nitrogen from 30 in situ incubations of foliage litters. Additionally, data from a laboratory incubation experiment were used to analyse the formation of microbial biomass, dissolved organic nitrogen, ammonium (NH +4 ) and microbial respiration. Parameter sensitivity was analysed according to the rate of acceptance of various settings in the MCMC calibration chain. The most important parameters for the decomposition process were the decomposition rate of lignin, and the temperature response parameter Q10. The most important parameters for the formation of microbial biomass, dissolved organic nitrogen, ammonium and microbial respiration, were the potential growth rate of the microbial population and the rate of microbial decay. Estimated optimal decomposition rates for field experiments are 0.003 ± 0.002 d−1 for lignin like compounds, 0.006 ± 0.004 d−1 for cellulose like compounds and 0.0286 ± 0.052 d−1 for solutes. The temperature response parameter Q10 is 3.2 ± 0.6 and the optimum decomposition temperature is 28.1 ± 4.3°C. Important model parameters on microbial biomass and nitrification are the maximum microbial growth rate μMAX = 0.13 ± 0.82 gCmic gC −1mic d−1 or the rate of microbial decay D = 0.006 ± 0.014 gCmic gC −1mic d−1. The model performance was tested for independent datasets. Generally, correlations between modelled and measured values, expressed in R2, were high for the remaining tissue dry weight, or concentrations of lignin, cellulose and solutes or organic nitrogen (R 2 > 0.84). Due to uncertainties in measurements of DON and NH +4 concentrations, microbial biomass or basal respiration and significant site variability in these parameters, the model performance for these parameters as expressed as R2 was somewhat lower, but statistically highly significant, and in the range of 0.1-0.96.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg B, McClaugherty C (1978) Nitrogen release from litter in relation to the disappearance of lignin. Biogeochem. 4:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Booltink H et al (1991a) Data on needle litter decomposition and soil climate as well as site characteristics for some coniferous forest sites. Part 1. Site characteristics. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Ecology and Environmental Research, Second edition report 41.

  • Berg B, Booltink H et al (1991b) Data on needle litter decomposition and soil climate as well as site characteristics for some coniferous forest sites. Part 2. Decomposition data. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Ecology and Environmental Research, Second edition report 42

  • Berg B, Ekbohm G (1991) Litter mass—loss rates and decomposition patterns in some needle and leaf litter types. Long—term decomposition in a Scots pine forest. VII. Can. J. Bot. 69:1449–1456

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Berg MP et al (1993) Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochem. 20:127–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B (2000) Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For. Ecol. Man. 133 pp 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagodatsky SA, Richter O (1998) Microbial growth in soil and nitrogen turnover: a theoretical model considering the activity state of microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1743–1755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney H F, Criddle W D, (1950) Determining water re-quirement in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data. USDA, SCS, SCS-TP96, 48p

  • Boddy E, Robberts P, Hill P W, Farrar J, Jones D L (2008) Turnover of low molecular weight dissolved organic C (DOC) and microbial C exhibit different temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40 1557–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braakhekke W, Bruijn AMG (2006) Modelling decomposition of standard plant material along an altitudinal gradient: a re-analyses of Coûteaux et al., (2002). Soil Biology and Biochem 39:99–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braswell BH, SacksWJ LE, Schimel DS (2005) Estimating diurnal to annual ecosystem parameters by synthesis of a carbon flux model with eddy covariance net ecosystem observations. Global Change Biol. 11:335–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterbach-Bahl K, Kock M, Willibald G Hewett B, Buhagiar S, Papen H, Kiese R (2004) Temporal variations of fluxes of NO, NO2, N2O, CO2 and CH4 in a tropical rain forest ecosystem. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 18(3). doi:101029/2004GB002243

  • Chen H, Harmon E, Griffiths RP, Hicks W (2000) Effects of temperature and moisture on carbon respired from decomposing woody roots. Forest Ecol. Managem. 138:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke RC, Whipps JM (1993) Ecophysiology of fungi. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC et al (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control over litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol. Letters 11:1065–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD et al (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:184–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10:63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coûteaux MM, Sarmiento L, Bottner P, Acevedo D, Thiéry JM, Vallejo VR (2002) Decomposition of standard plant material along an altitudinal transect (65–3968 m) in the tropical Andes. Soil Biol Biochem 34:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Vitousek PM, Matson PA, Riley R, Garciá-Méndez G, Maass JM (1991) Soil emissions of nitric oxide in a seasonally dry tropical forest of México. J. Geophys. Res. 96:15439–15445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA, Luo I (2006) On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10. Global Change Biol. 12:154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fioretto A, Di Nardo C, Papa S, Fuggi A (2005) Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem Soil Biol. Biochem. 37:1083–1091

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frieder JK, Gabel D (2001) Microbial biomass and microbial C:N ratio in bulk soil and buried bags for evaluating in situ net N mineralization in agricultural soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Méndez G, Maass JM, Matson P, Vitousek PM (1991) Nitrogen transformations and nitrogen oxide flux in tropical deciduous forest in México. Oecologia 88:362–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen TM, Breland TA (1999) Decomposition of crop residues in the field: evaluation of a simulation model developed from microcosm studies. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1423–1434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA, Davidson EA, Woodwell GM (1998) Missing sinks, feedbacks, and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon balance. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 12:25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson PE, Karlberg L (2004) Coupled heat and mass transfer model for soil-plant-atmosphere systems. Royal Institute of Technology, dept of Civil and Environmental Engeneering, Stockholm, 435 (www.lwr.kth.se/CoupModel/CoupModel.pdf)

  • Joanisse GD, Bradley RL, Preston CM (2008) Do late-successional tannin-rich plant communities occurring on high acidic soils increase the DON/DIN ratio? Biol Fertil Soils 44:903–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage, Soil Biol. Biochem. 27:753–760

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum MUF (2000) Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biogeochemistry 48:21–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leffelaar PA, Wessel WW (1988) Denitrification in a homogeneous, closed system: experiment and simulation. Soil Sci 146:335–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton TM, Huntingford C (2003) Global terrestrial carbon storage and uncertainties in its temperature sensitivity examined with a simple model. Global Change Biology 9:1333–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CS, Frolking S, Frolking TA (1992) A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events, 1, Model structure and sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. 97:9759–9776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Aber J, Stange F, Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H (2000) A process-oriented model of N2O and NO emissions from forest soils: 1, Model development. J. Geophys. Res. 105:4369–4384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmander A, Kätterer T, Andrén O (1998) Modelling the effects of temperature and moisture on CO2 evolution from top- and subsoil using a multicomponent approach. Soil Biol Biochem 30:2023–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmus K, Ivask M (1995) Decomposition and nitrogen dynamics of fine roots of Norway sprucs (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Plant Soi 168–169:89–95 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN et al (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys 21:1087–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parnas H (1976) A theoretical explanation of the priming effect based on microbial growth with two limiting substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 8:139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Hartman M, Oijima D, Schimel D (1998) DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing. Global Planet Change 19:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Fasham MJR et al (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ (eds) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 183–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44B:81–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rees R, Change SC, Wang CP, Matzner E (2006) Release of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon during decomposition of Chamaecyparis obtusa var. formosana leaves in a mountain forest in Taiwan. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci 169:792–798

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DV (1977) Enzyme kinetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah DB, Coulman GA (1978) Kinetics of nitrification and denitrification reactions, Biotechn. Bioengin. 20:43–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitch S, Huntingford C, Gedney N, Levy PE, Lomas M, Piao SL, Betts R, Ciais P, Cox P, Friedlingstein P, Jones CD, Prentice IC, Woodward FI (2008) Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Global Change Biol 14:2015–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oijen M, Rougier J, Smith R (2005) Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Phys. 25:915–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessén B, Berg B (1986) Long-term decomposition of barley straw: chemical changes and ingrowth of fungal mycelium. Soil Biol Biochem 18:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Curtin D, Jame YW, McConkey BG, Zhou HF (2002) Simulation of soil carbon dioxide flux during plant residue decomposition. S. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:1304–1310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore AP (1991) A method for assessing the goodness of computer simulation of soil processes. J. Soil Sci. 42:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobith JM, Moore DJP, Sacks WJ, Monson RK, Bowling DR, Schimel DS (2008) Integration of process-based soil respiration models with whole ecosystem CO2 measurements. Ecosystems 11:250–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by the European Commission in the NITROEUROPE project. Further thanks go to Prof. Fioretto (Univ. of Naples, Italy) to Prof Breland en Dr. Henriksen (Agr. Univ. of Norway), to Dr. Lŏhmus (Tartu University, Estonia), Dr. Berg (Complesso Universitario Monte San Angelo, Italy) and Dr. Giles Joanisse (Université de Sherbrooke, Canada) for making available the datasets mentioned in Table 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Butterbach-Bahl.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Elizabeth (Liz) A. Stockdale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Bruijn, A.M.G., Butterbach-Bahl, K. Linking carbon and nitrogen mineralization with microbial responses to substrate availability — the DECONIT model. Plant Soil 328, 271–290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0108-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0108-9

Keywords

Navigation