References
Ho KKY, Fleseriu M, Wass J et al (2019) A tale of pituitary adenomas: to NET or not to NET: Pituitary Society position statement. Pituitary 22(6):569–573
Asa SL, Asioli S, Bozkurt S et al (2019) Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs): nomenclature evolution, not clinical revolution. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-01015-0
Asa SL, Casar-Borota O, Chanson P et al (2017) From pituitary adenoma to pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET): an International Pituitary Pathology Club proposal. Endocr Relat Cancer 24(4):C5–C8
Asioli S, Righi A, Iommi M et al (2019) Validation of a clinicopathological score for the prediction of post-surgical evolution of pituitary adenoma: retrospective analysis on 566 patients from a tertiary care centre. Eur J Endocrinol 180(2):127–134
Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A (2006) High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege Belgium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(12):4769–4775
Tampourlou M, Ntali G, Ahmed S et al (2017) Outcome of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas that regrow after primary treatment: a study from two large UK centers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102(6):1889–1897
Atkinson H, England JA, Rafferty A et al (2013) Somatostatin receptor expression in thyroid disease. Int J Exp Pathol 94(3):226–229
Forssell-Aronsson EB, Nilsson O, Benjegard SA et al (1111n) 1111n-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide binding and somatostatin receptor subtypes in thyroid tumors. J Nucl Med 41:636–642
Pisarek H, Stepien T, Kubiak R, Pawlikowski M (2008) Somatostatin receptors in human adrenal gland tumors–immunohistochemical study. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 46(3):345–351
Mariniello B, Finco I, Sartorato P et al (2011) Somatostatin receptor expression in adrenocortical tumors and effect of a new somatostatin analog SOM230 on hormone secretion in vitro and in ex vivo adrenal cells. J Endocrinol Invest 34(6):e131
Funding
This statement received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, K.K.Y., Fleseriu, M., Wass, J. et al. The tale in evolution: clarity, consistency and consultation, not contradiction and confusion. Pituitary 23, 476–477 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-01027-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-01027-w