Abstract
Mights plug gaps. If p lacks a truth-value, then ‘It might be that p’ should also lack truth-value. Yet epistemic hedges often turn an unassertible statement into an assertible one. The phenomenon is illustrated in detail for two kinds of statements that are frequently alleged to be counterexamples to the principle of bivalence: future contingents and statements that apply predicates to borderline cases. The paper concludes by exploring the prospects for generalizing this gap-plugging strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.A. Anderson (1983) ArticleTitle‘The Paradox of the Knower’ The Journal of Philosophy 80 338–355 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2026335
S.L. Armstrong H. Gleitman (1983) ArticleTitle‘What Some Concepts Might Not Be’ Cognition 13 263–308 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0277(83)90012-4
K. DeRose (1991) ArticleTitle‘Epistemic Possibilities’ Philosophical Review C IssueID4 581–605 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2185175
K. DeRose (1998) ArticleTitle‘Simple Mights, Indicative Possibilities, and the Open Future’ Philosophical Quarterly 48/190 67–82 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9213.00082
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1970) ‘Truth and Paradoxical Consequences’ R.L. Martin (Eds) The Paradox of the Liar Yale University Press New Haven
I. Hacking (1967) ArticleTitle‘Possibility’ Philosophical Review 76 143–168 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2183640
J. Hintikka (1962) Knowledge and Belief Cornell University Press Ithaca
K. Hyland (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles John Benjamins Publishing Company Philadelphia
G. Lakoff (1973) ArticleTitle‘Hedges’. A study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 458–506 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00262952
Lutz, R. (2003): ‘Evil squirrels pose dilemmas’, The Daily Cougar 36(86) (January 31, 2003)
Moore, G.E. (1962): in C. Lewy (ed.), The Commonplace Books, London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd
Peirce (1931–1935): Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. I–Vi, C. Hartshorne and P Weiss (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, vol. II, paragraph 2.347; vol. V. paragraphs 5, pp. 454–455
A. Prior (1967) Past, Present and Future Clarendon Press Oxford
J.F. Post (1970) ArticleTitle‘The Possible Liar’ Nous 4 405–409
E. Rosch B.L. Barbara (1978) Cognition and Categorization L. Erlebaum Hillsdale, N.J
W. Sinnott-Armstrong (1994) ArticleTitle‘The Truth of Performatives’ International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2/1 320–344
R. Stalnaker (1984) Inquiry MIT press Cambridge
P. Strawson (1950) ArticleTitle‘On Referring’ Mind 59 320–344
Strawson, P. (1952): Introduction to Logical Theory, Metheun
P. Strawson (1964) ArticleTitle‘Identifying Reference and Truth-Values’ Theoria 3 96–118
A. Swofford (2003) Jarhead Scribner New York
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1968) ArticleTitle‘Presupposition, Implication, and Self-Reference’ Journal of Philosophy 65 136–152 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2024557
P. Teller (1972) ArticleTitle‘Epistemic Possibility’ Philosophia 2/4 303–320 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02381591
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorensen, R. Sharp Edges from Hedges: Fatalism, Vagueness and Epistemic Possibility. Philos Stud 131, 607–626 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7701-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7701-4