Abstract
An assessment of the influence of topography on landslide occurrence in the Kigezi highlands of southwestern Uganda was conducted. Whereas the frequency and magnitude of landslides in these highlands are on the increase, the topographic attributes underpinning landslide occurrence are not well understood. Sixty-five landslide scars were surveyed and mapped to produce landslide distribution maps. Specific topographic parameters, namely slope gradient, profile curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), and topographic position index (TPI), were assessed on landslide slope sites. The attributes were parameterized in the field and GIS environment using a 10-m DEM. Landslides were noted to concentrate along narrow topographic hollows, as opposed to broad concave slopes in the landscape. The occurrence is dominant in slope zones where slope gradient, profile curvature, TWI, TPI, and SPI are 25°–35°, 0.1–5, 8–18, − 1–1, and > 10, respectively. It was established that profile curvature and slope gradient are the most and least significant topographic parameters in landslide occurrence (R2 = 0.802, p value = 0.088 and R2 = 0.5665, p value = 0.057), respectively. An understanding of these topographic underpinnings would serve to identify and predict potential landslide zones within the landscape and enhance landslide hazard mitigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali G, Birkel C, Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C, Mcdonnell JJ, Tarolli P (2014) a comparison of wetness indices for the prediction of observed connected saturated areas under contrasting conditions. Earth Surf Process Landf 39(3):399–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/espe.3506
Bagoora FDK (1988) Soil erosion, mass wasting risk in the highland areas of Uganda. Mt Res Dev 8:173–182
Bagoora FDK (1989) A preliminary investigation into the consequences of inadequate conservation policies on steep slopes of the Rukiga highlands, South Western Uganda. In: Thomas DB, Biamah EK, Kilewe AM (eds) Soil conservation in Kenya. Dept Agri Er, Univ Nairobi, Kenya
Bagoora FDK (1993) An assessment of some causes and effects of soil erosion hazard in Kabale Highland, South Western Uganda, and peoples attitude towards conservation. In: Abdellatif B (ed) Resource use and conservation: Faculty of Social Sciences, Mountain Research and Development, vol 8. Mohammed V. University, Rabat
Broothaerts N, Kissi E, Poesen J, Van Rompaey A, Getahun K, Van Ranst E, Diels J (2012) Spatial patterns, causes and consequences of landslides in the Gilgel Gibe catchment, SW Ethiopia. CATENA 97:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.011
Buda AR (2013) Surface-runoff generation and forms of overland flow. Treatise Geomorphol 7:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00151-2
Capitani M, Ribolini A, Bini M (2013) The slope aspect: a predisposing factor for landsliding. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 345(11–12):427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2013.11.002
Carson B (1985) Erosion and sedimentation processes in the Nepalese Himalaya, occasional paper no. l. ICIMOD, Kathmandu
Chi BL, Bing CS, WalleyF Yates T (2009) Topographic indices and yield variability in a rolling landscape of western Canada. Pedosphere 19(3):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60127-2
Claessens L, Knapen A, Kitutu MG, Poesen J, Deckers JA (2007) Modelling landslide hazard, soil redistribution and sediment yield of landslides on the Ugandan footslopes of Mount Elgon. Geomorphology 90(1–2):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.01.007
Conrad O, Bechtel B, Bock M, Dietrich H, Fischer E, Gerlitz L, Wehberg J, Wichmann V, Böhner J (2015) System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v.2.1.4. Geosci Model Dev 27(8):1991–2007
Corominas J (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):209–263
Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, natural resources council. Transportation Research Board Spec Rept, vol 247. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 36–75
Ferreira CSS, Walsh RPD, Steenhuis TS, Shakesby RA, Nunes JPN, Coelho COA, Ferreira AJD (2015) Spatiotemporal variability of hydrologic soil properties and the implications for overland flow and land management in a peri-urban Mediterranean catchment. J Hydrol 525:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.039
Gao J, Maro J (2010) Topographic controls on evolution of shallow landslides in pastoral Wairarapa, New Zealand, 1979–2003. Geomorphology 114(3):373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.08.002
Grabs T, Seibert J, Bishop K, Laudon H (2009) Modelling spatial patterns of saturated areas: a comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J Hydrol 373(1–2):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.031
Gu Y, Wylie BK (2016) Using satellite vegetation and compound topographic indices to map highly erodible cropland buffers for cellulosic biofuel crop developments in eastern Nebraska, USA. Ecol Ind 60:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.019
Hosseini SA, Reza L, Majid L, Ataollah K, Aidin Parsakhoo A (2011) The effect of terrain factors on landslide features along forest road. Afr J Biotechnol 10(64):14108–14115
Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E (2005) Landslide risk management. Taylor and Francis, London, p 763
Infascelli R, Faugno S, Pindozzi S, Boccia L, Merot P (2013) Testing different topographic indexes to predict wetlands distribution. Procedia Environ Sci 19:733–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.082
Kirschbaum DB, Zhou Y (2015) Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog. J Geomorphol. https://doi.org/10.1016/2015.03.016
Kirschbaum DB, Stanley T, Zhou T (2015) Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog. J Geomorphol 249(Geohazard Databases: Concepts, Development, Applications):4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.016
Kirschbaum DB, Stanley T, Yatheendradas S (2016) Modelling landslide susceptibility over large regions with fuzzy overlay. Landslides 13:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0577-2
Kitutu MG, Muwanga A, Posen J, Deckers JA (2004) The relationship between geology and landslides in Manjiya County, south west of Mount Elgon, Eastern Uganda. In: Geoscience Africa 2004 conference. Abstract volume 1. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, pp 349–350
Kitutu MG, Muwanga A, Poesen J, Deckers JA (2009) Influence of soil properties on landslide occurrence in Bududa District, Eastern Uganda. Afr J Agric Res 4(7):611–620
Kitutu MG, Poesen JM, Deckers J (2011) Farmer’s perception on landslide occurrences in Bududa District, Eastern Uganda. Afr J Agric Res 6:7–18
Knapen A, Kitutu MG, Poesen J, Breugelmans W, Deckers J, Muwanga A (2006) Landslides in a densely populated county at the footsteps of Mount Elgon (Uganda): characteristics and causal factors. Geomorphology 73:149–165
Liang WL, Uchida T (2014) Effects of topography and soil depth on saturated-zone dynamics in steep hillslopes explored using the three-dimensional Richards’ equation. J Hydrol 510:124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.029
Liesbet J, Olivier D, Jean P, Damien D, Wim T, Matthieu K (2015) The Rwenzori Mountains, a landslide prone region. J Int Consort Landslides. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0582-5
Loos M, Elsenbeer H (2011) Topographic controls on overland flow generation in a forest—an ensemble tree approach. J Hydrol 409(1–2):94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.002
López-Davalillo B, Monod MI, Alvarez-Fernandez G, Herrera-Garcia J, Darrozes C, Gonzalez-Nicieza Olivier M (2014) Morphology and causes of landslides in Portalet area (Spanish Pyrenees): probabilistic analysis by means of numerical modelling. Eng Fail Anal 36:390–406
Mertens K, Jacobs L, Maes J, Kabaseke C, Maertens M, Poesen J, Vranken L (2015) The impact of landslides on household income in tropical regions: a case study from the Rwenzori Mountains in Uganda (No. 1067-2016-86792)
Mokarram M, Roshan G, Negahban S (2015) Landform classification using topographic position index (case study: salt dome of Korsia-Darab plain, Iran). Model Earth Syst Environ 1(4):40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0055-9
Mugagga F, Kakembo V, Buyinza M (2011) A characterisation of the physical properties of soil and the implications for landslide occurrence on the slopes of Mount Elgon, Eastern Uganda. J Int Soc Prevent Mitig Nat Hazards. ISSN 0921-030X. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9896-3
Mugagga F, Kakembo V, Buyinza M (2012) Land use changes on the slopes of Mount Elgon and the implications for the occurrence of landslides. CATENA 90:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.11.004
Muwanga A, Schuman A, Biryabarema M (2001) Landslides in Uganda—documentation of a natural hazard. Nat Hazards 136:111–115
Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Adhikari MD, Nayak A, Devaraj N, Ghosh SK, Mahajan AK (2013) Topographic gradient based site characterization in India complemented by strong ground-motion spectral attributes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 55:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.005
NEMA (2008) National State of environment report for Uganda for 2007/08. National Environment Management Authority, Kampala, Uganda. http://www.nemaug.org
NEMA (2010) National State of environment report for Uganda for 2009/2010. National Environment Management Authority, Kampala
NEMA (2012) National State of environment report for Uganda for 2011/12. National Environment Management Authority, Kampala
NEMA (2014) National State of environment report for Uganda for 2013/14. National Environment Management Authority, Kampala
NEMA (2016) National State of environment report for Uganda for 2015/16. National Environment Management Authority, Kampala
NEMA (2017) National State of environment report for Uganda for 2016/17. National Environment Management Authority, Kampala
Ollier CD (1969) Terrain classification and data storage, Uganda land system. MEXE report no: 959. University of Oxford Press, Oxford
Quinn P, Beven KJ, Lamb R (1995) The ln(a/tanß) index: how to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framework. Hydrol Process 9:161–182
Raju BCK, Nandagiri L (2015) Identification of hydrologically active areas in a watershed using satellite data. Aquatic Procedia 4(1):1339–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.174
Seif A (2014) Using topography position index for landform classification (case study: grain mountain). Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci 3(11):33–39
Seif A, Mokarram M (2014) GIS-based automated landform classification in Zagros mountain (case study: grain mountain). Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci 3(3):20–33
Selby MG (1993) Hillslope materials and processes. Oxford University Press, New York
Susana A, Elizabeth AH, Francesca P, Thorsten W (2017) Dealing with deep uncertainties in landslide modelling for disaster risk reduction under climate change. J Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17:225–241
Tagil S, Jenness J (2008) GIS-based automated landform classification and topographic, land cover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. J Appl Sci 8(6):910–921. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.910.921
UBOS (2017) Statistical abstracts 2017. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Uganda. http://www.ubos.org
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the research grant from the Department of Research Capacity Development (RCD) of the Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth and Makerere University—Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) Phase IV (2015/2020 Agreement)—Building Resilient Ecosystems and livelihoods to Climate Change and Disaster Risk (BREAD) project 331 research component, which funded travel and fieldwork for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Landslide scar geometric characteristics
Appendix: Landslide scar geometric characteristics
Landslide scars | Landslide scar dimensions (m) | Area of the landslide scar (m2) | Volume of the scar (m3) | Gradient (°) range at slide failure zone | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average width (m) | Average depth (m) | Length (m) | ||||
1 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 402 | 1487 | 2462 | 25–28 |
2 | 9.66 | 2.3 | 463.5 | 4477 | 6064 | 30–32 |
3 | 17.5 | 0.74 | 350 | 6125 | 4427 | 30–34 |
4 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 602 | 1264 | 3773 | 26–27 |
5 | 8.5 | 2.245 | 14.1 | 120 | 258 | 30–33 |
6 | 10 | 5 | 600 | 6000 | 30,000 | 33–35 |
7 | 10 | 5 | 400 | 4000 | 20,000 | 32–34 |
8 | 10 | 5.3 | 498 | 4980 | 26,394 | 31–33 |
9 | 16.6 | 4.3 | 315 | 5229 | 22,600 | 33–35 |
10 | 10 | 0.5 | 12.5 | 125 | 63 | 23–25 |
11 | 5.6 | 0.85 | 525.1 | 2941 | 1676 | 42–45 |
12 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 530 | 3074 | 10,508 | 39–42 |
13 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 885 | 2390 | 3669 | 33–36 |
14 | 3.14 | 1.52 | 786 | 2468 | 4341 | 30–33 |
15 | 2.95 | 1.6 | 784 | 2313 | 4518 | 34–37 |
16 | 6.2 | 2.8 | 835 | 5177 | 14,496 | 35–37 |
17 | 4.33 | 2.8 | 752 | 3256 | 9413 | 29–32 |
18 | 5 | 2.5 | 600 | 3000 | 7500 | 33–35 |
19 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 653 | 1633 | 4081 | 34–37 |
20 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 268 | 456 | 866 | 29–31 |
21 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 198 | 238 | 333 | 24–27 |
22 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 213 | 192 | 403 | 30–33 |
23 | 2.4 | 2 | 201 | 482 | 965 | 28–30 |
24 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 341 | 580 | 812 | 17–19 |
25 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 189 | 435 | 826 | 20–23 |
26 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 244 | 683 | 1161 | 26–29 |
27 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 196 | 372 | 447 | 31–34 |
28 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 204 | 490 | 734 | 15–18 |
29 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 302 | 846 | 1607 | 19–22 |
30 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 194 | 369 | 590 | 29–32 |
31 | 2.1 | 2 | 219 | 460 | 920 | 26–29 |
32 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 142 | 185 | 332 | 24–26 |
33 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 408 | 1102 | 2424 | 29–31 |
34 | 2.5 | 2 | 386 | 965 | 1930 | 34–37 |
35 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 125 | 200 | 180 | 26–29 |
36 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 184 | 313 | 657 | 20–23 |
37 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 296 | 710 | 1563 | 23–26 |
38 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 202 | 364 | 436 | 28–31 |
39 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 182 | 255 | 433 | 30–34 |
40 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 501 | 1353 | 2976 | 25–28 |
41 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 234 | 491 | 835 | 18–21 |
42 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 267 | 401 | 721 | 28–32 |
43 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 58 | 128 | 281 | 25–27 |
44 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 135 | 257 | 693 | 22–25 |
45 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 196 | 549 | 659 | 30–33 |
46 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 243 | 559 | 1062 | 28–31 |
47 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 55 | 231 | 208 | 26–30 |
48 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 129 | 374 | 412 | 33–35 |
49 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 231 | 739 | 517 | 29–32 |
50 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 89 | 276 | 221 | 20–22 |
51 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 197 | 552 | 1158 | 18–21 |
52 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 238 | 809 | 1376 | 17–19 |
53 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 345 | 1104 | 1325 | 32–34 |
54 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 118 | 330 | 264 | 16–18 |
55 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 102 | 184 | 202 | 18–20 |
56 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 189 | 680 | 1905 | 29–32 |
57 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 213 | 831 | 2575 | 25–28 |
58 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 96 | 307 | 829 | 27–29 |
59 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 47 | 85 | 102 | 22–25 |
60 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 66 | 79 | 63 | 20–22 |
61 | 5.9 | 2.1 | 138 | 814 | 1710 | 26–29 |
62 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 123 | 443 | 841 | 32–34 |
63 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 84 | 521 | 1667 | 29–32 |
64 | 7 | 1.7 | 73 | 511 | 869 | 23–25 |
65 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 144 | 605 | 786 | 27–30 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nseka, D., Kakembo, V., Bamutaze, Y. et al. Analysis of topographic parameters underpinning landslide occurrence in Kigezi highlands of southwestern Uganda. Nat Hazards 99, 973–989 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03787-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03787-x