Abstract
Tissue folding is a frequently observed phenomenon, from the cerebral cortex gyrification, to the gut villi formation and even the crocodile head scales development. Although its causes are not yet well understood, some hypotheses suggest that it is related to the physical properties of the tissue and its growth under mechanical constraints. In order to study the underlying mechanisms affecting tissue folding, experimental models are developed where epithelium monolayers are cultured inside hydrogel microcapsules. In this work, we use a 2D vertex model of circular cross-sections of cell monolayers to investigate how cell mechanical properties and proliferation affect the shape of in-silico growing tissues. We observe that increasing the cells’ contractility and the intercellular adhesion reduces tissue buckling. This is found to coincide with smaller and thicker cross-sections that are characterized by shorter relaxation times following cell division. Finally, we show that the smooth or folded morphology of the simulated monolayers also depends on the combination of the cell proliferation rate and the tissue size.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
\(A^0\) of a cell \(\alpha\) is increased each 3000 iterations by \(\Delta {A^0} = {0.1\cdot A_{\alpha }\text {(before mitosis)}}\), which is enough time for a cell to reach equilibrium between each \(A^0\) increment in our simulations, with a time step \(\delta t\) and a damping \(\eta\) parameters equal to \(10^{-1}\) sec and 1 sec\(^{-1}\). The choice of the cell growth rate corresponds to the implementation of a multi-scale simulation technique (combining the relaxation time scale in the order of minutes and the proliferation time scale in the order of 10–20 h), and does not correspond to biologically realistic growth times. We artificially accelerate the cell growth to speed up the execution of our simulations. However, the quasi-static growth of cells insures that we get the same results as those we would have obtained with a slower and more biologically realistic cell growth.
As long as the tissue does not have the time to return to its equilibrium state between two cell divisions.
References
Alessandri K, Sarangi BR, Gurchenkov VV, Sinha B, Kiessling TR, Fetler L, Rico F, Scheuring S, Lamaze C, Simon A, Geraldo S, Vignjević D, Domejean H, Rolland L, Funfak A, Bibette J, Bremond N, Nassoy P (2013) Cellular capsules as a tool for multicellular spheroid production and for investigating the mechanics of tumor progression in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(37):14843. doi:10.1073/pnas.1309482110
Alessandri K, Feyeux M, Gurchenkov B, Delgado C, Trushko A, Krause KH, Vignjević D, Nassoy P, Roux A (2016) A 3D printed microfluidic device for production of functionalized hydrogel microcapsules for culture and differentiation of human neuronal stem cells (hNSC). Lab Chip 16(9):1593. doi:10.1039/C6LC00133E
Aliee M, Röper JC, Landsberg KP, Pentzold C, Widmann TJ, Jülicher F, Dahmann C (2012) Physical mechanisms shaping the Drosophila dorsoventral compartment boundary. Curr Biol 22(11):967. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.070
Alt S, Ganguly P, Salbreux G (2017) Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 372(1720):20150520. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0520
Bielmeier C, Alt S, Weichselberger V, La Fortezza M, Harz H, Jülicher F, Salbreux G, Classen AK (2016) Interface contractility between differently fated cells drives cell elimination and cyst formation. Curr Biol 26(5):563. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.063
Mota B, Herculano-Houzel S (2015) Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons. Science 349(6243):74. doi:10.1126/science.aaa9101
Simons BD (2013) Getting your gut into shape. Science 342(6155):203. doi:10.1126/science.1245288
Farhadifar R, Röper JC, Aigouy B, Eaton S, Jülicher F (2007) The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr Biol 17(24):2095. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.049
Fletcher AG, Osborne JM, Maini PK, Gavaghan DJ (2013) Implementing vertex dynamics models of cell populations in biology within a consistent computational framework. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 113(2):299. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.09.003
Fletcher AG, Osterfield M, Baker RE, Shvartsman SY (2014) Vertex models of epithelial morphogenesis. Biophys J 106(11):2291. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.4498
Štorgel N, Krajnc M, Mrak P, Štrus J, Ziherl P(2016) Quantitative morphology of epithelial folds. Biophys J 110(1):269. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.024
Merzouki A, Malaspinas O, Chopard B (2016) The mechanical properties of a cell-based numerical model of epithelium. Soft Matter 12(21):4745. doi:10.1039/C6SM00106H
Milinkovitch MC, Manukyan L, Debry A, Di-Poï N, Martin S, Singh D, Lambert D, Zwicker M (2013) Crocodile head scales are not developmental units but emerge from physical cracking. Science 339(6115):78. doi:10.1126/science.1226265
Misra M, Audoly B, Kevrekidis IG, Shvartsman SY (2016) Shape transformations of epithelial shells. Biophys J 110(7):1670. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.009
Monier B, Gettings M, Gay G, Mangeat T, Schott S, Guarner A, Suzanne M (2015) Apico-basal forces exerted by apoptotic cells drive epithelium folding. Nature 518(7538):245. doi:10.1038/nature14152
Mota B, Herculano-Houzel S (2015) Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons. Science 349(6243):74. doi:10.1126/science.aaa9101
Nagai T, Honda H (2009) Computer simulation of wound closure in epithelial tissues: cell basal-lamina adhesion. Phys Rev E 80(6):061903. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.061903
Polyakov O, He B, Swan M, Shaevitz JW, Kaschube M, Wieschaus E (2014) Passive mechanical forces control cell-shape change during Drosophila ventral furrow formation. Biophys J 107(4):998. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.013
Rauzi M, Hoevar Brezavek A, Ziherl P, Leptin M (2013) Physical models of mesoderm invagination in Drosophila embryo. Biophys J 105(1):3. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.039
Shyer A, Talline T, Nerurkar N, Wei Z, Kim E, Kaplan D, Tabin C, Mahadevan L (2013) Villification: how the gut gets its villi. Science 342:212
Simons BD (2013) Getting your gut into shape. Science 342(6155):203. doi:10.1126/science.1245288
Štorgel N, Krajnc M, Mrak P, Štrus J, Ziherl P, (2016) Quantitative morphology of epithelial folds. Biophys J 110(1):269. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.024
Tallinen T, Chung JY, Rousseau F, Girard N, Lefèvre J, Mahadevan L (2016) On the growth and form of cortical convolutions. Nat Phys 12(6):588. doi:10.1038/nphys3632
Brückner BR (1853) Janshoff A (2015), Elastic properties of epithelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res 11, Part B:3075. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.07.010
Tamulonis C, Postma M, Marlow HQ, Magie CR, de Jong J, Kaandorp J (2011) A cell-based model of Nematostella vectensis gastrulation including bottle cell formation, invagination and zippering. Dev Biol 351(1):217. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.10.017
Umetsu D, Aigouy B, Aliee M, Sui L, Eaton S, Jülicher F, Dahmann C (2014) Local increases in mechanical tension shape compartment boundaries by biasing cell intercalations. Curr Biol 24(15):1798. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.052
Acknowledgements
We thank the SystemsX.ch initiative who supported this work (project EpiPhysX).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merzouki, A., Malaspinas, O., Trushko, A. et al. Influence of cell mechanics and proliferation on the buckling of simulated tissues using a vertex model. Nat Comput 17, 511–519 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-017-9629-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-017-9629-y