Skip to main content
Log in

A dynamic computational model of employees goal transformation: Using self-determination theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following self-determination theory, this paper investigates the relations of employees’ perceptions of supervisors’ autonomy-supportive or controlling environments to their intrinsic or extrinsic work goals using both a field study and a computational dynamics model (Vancouver and Weinhardt in Org Res Methods 15(4):602–623, 2012), which is a recent and innovative technique. In Study 1, we did an empirical study with 128 employees over a half-year period and found that employees’ perceptions of supervisors’ autonomy-supportive environments satisfied employees’ basic psychological needs and promoted their intrinsic goals; controlling environments frustrated their basic needs and promoted their extrinsic goals. In Study 2, we used a system dynamics model to simulate the change in employees’ extrinsic goals, and the results showed that perceptions of supervisors’ autonomy-supportive environments related to the transformation of employees’ extrinsic goals. The study contributes by demonstrating that employees’ perception of supervisors’ environments could be a reason for employees’ different goal orientations, and it contributes by simulating the use of the dynamic process of goal transformation in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, R., Polos, L., Ryall, M., & Sorenson, O. (2009). The case for formal theory. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, T., Yeo, G., Vancouver, J. B., & Neal, A. (2017). The dynamics of avoidance goal regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 41(6), 698–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296–3319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1459–1473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 440–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: PlenumPress.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, B. (2011). The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits revisited: The moderating role of general causality orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 684–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, B., Giletta, M., Kuppens, P., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits and peer dynamics: Selection and influence processes among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36(5), 925–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frodi, T., & O’Keane, V. (2016). Integrating the stress systems and neuroimaging in depression. In T. Frodi (Ed.) Systems neuroscience in depression (pp. 269–308). Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, N., Colombat, P., Michinov, E., Pronost, A. M., & Fouquereau, E. (2013). Procedural justice, supervisor autonomy support, work satisfaction, organizational identification and job performance: The mediating role of need satisfaction and perceived organizational support. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), 2560–2571.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, N., Gagne, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grouzet, F. M., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M. F., Kim, Y., Lau, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 800–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2009). Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: An intervention study. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(3), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C. L., & Ilgen, D. R. (2000). Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. In D. R. Ilgen & C. L. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J., Wanberg, C., Rubenstein, A., & Song, Z. (2013). Support, undermining, and newcomer socialization: Fitting in during the first 90 days. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1104–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Zax, M., & Sameroff, A. J. (1995). The relations of maternal and social environments to late adolescents’ materialistic and prosocial values. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1988). On time and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Powers, T. A., Milyavskaya, M., Carbonneau, N., & Hope, N. (2015). Goal internalization and persistence as a function of autonomous and directive forms of goal support. Journal of Personality, 83(2), 179–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (2008). The brighter side of human nature: Altruism and empathy in everyday life. New York: Basic Books Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, A. T., Kindlein, J., Trépanier, S., Forest, J., Zigarmi, D., Houson, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2016). Why individuals want money is what matters: Using self-determination theory to explain the differential relationship between motives for making money and employee psychological health. Motivation and Emotion, 40(2), 226–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekes, N., Gingras, I., Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., & Fang, J. (2010). Parental autonomy-support, intrinsic life goals, and well-being among adolescents in China and North America. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 858–869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2015). Can pursuit for material bring us happiness and well-being? Studies on materialistic values and its effects. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 15(4), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindwall, M., Weman-Josefsson, K., Sebire, S. J., & Standage, M. (2016). Viewing exercise goal content through a person-oriented lens: A self-determination perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 27, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well-being: Testing self-determination theory in a Chinese work organisation. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 245–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well being. American Psychologist (63), 397–427.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum, C. A., & Vancouver, J. B. (2010). If we produce discrepancies, then how? Testing a computational process model of positive goal revision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(9), 2201–2231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Gunz, A. (2009). Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1467–1492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S. (2015). Dynamics of well-being. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 2(1), 261–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, C. S., & Timpone, R. J. (1996). Computational modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H. (2008). The Chinese version of aspiration index: Reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Yperen, N. W., & Orehek, E. (2013). Achievement goals in the workplace: Conceptualization, prevalence, profiles, and outcomes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 38, 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes. Behavioral Science, 41(3), 165–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., & Purl, J. D. (2017). A computational model of self-efficacy’s various effects on performance: Moving the debate forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(4), 599–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Putka, D. J., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2005). Testing a computational model of the goal-level effect: An example of a neglected methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 100–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Tamanini, K. B., & Yoder, R. J. (2010). Using dynamic computational models to reconnect theory and research: Socialization by the proactive newcomer as example. Journal of Management, 36(3), 764–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., & Weinhardt, J. M. (2012). Modeling the mind and the milieu: Computational modeling for micro-level organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 602–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Weinhardt, J. M., & Vigo, R. (2014). Change one can believe in: Adding learning to computational models of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(1), 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., Witte, H., & Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Smeets, S., Soenens, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Duriez, B. (2008). Presenting a positive alternative to strivings for material success and the thin-ideal: Understanding the effects of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits. Positive Psychology: Exploring the Best in People, 4, 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Zhou, L., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Dynamic modeling. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., Hedberg, V. A., Cox, E. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Extrinsic life goals and health-risk behaviors in adolescents 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1756–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71771022), Basic research funding project of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Grant No. FRF-BR-18-001B) and China Scholarship Council (CSC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Employees’ perception of basic need = Basic need

Employees’ comparator for basic need = IF THEN ELSE(Employees’ perception of basic need < 0, -(Standard of basic need-Employees’ perception of basic need), IF THEN ELSE (Employees’ perception of basic need < 1, Standard of basic need-Employees’ perception of basic need, Employees’ perception of basic need-Standard of basic need/2))

Employees’ goal orientation = IF THEN ELSE (Employees’ comparator for basic need > 1, importance*EXP (Employees’ comparator for basic need), IF THEN ELSE (Employees’ comparator for basic need< − 1, -importance*SQRT (-Employees’ comparator for basic need), importance*Employees’ comparator for basic need))

$$\mathop {{\text{Well-being}}\;=\smallint }\nolimits^{} \left( {\text{bias}} \times {\text{employees' goal orientation}}\right) {\text{dt}}$$
$${\text{Basic need}}\;{\text{=}}\mathop \smallint \nolimits^{} \left( {{\text{employees' goal orientation}} \times 0.5+0.2 \times {\text{employees' perception of environment}}} \right){\text{dt}}$$

Employees’ perception of environment = − 3 + STEP (6, 5)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Forest, J. et al. A dynamic computational model of employees goal transformation: Using self-determination theory. Motiv Emot 43, 447–460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09753-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09753-1

Keywords

Navigation