Abstract
The common liberal understanding of reproductive autonomy – characterized by free choice and a principle of non-interference – serves as a useful way to analyse the normative appeal of having certain choices open to people in the reproductive realm, especially for issues like abortion rights. However, this liberal reading of reproductive autonomy only offers us a limited ethical understanding of what is at stake in many kinds of reproductive choices, particularly when it comes to different uses of reproductive technologies and third-party reproduction. This is because the liberal framework does not fully capture who benefits from which reproductive options, the extent of the risks and harms involved in various reproductive interventions, and the reasons for why people are driven to make certain reproductive choices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. A., M. C. Davies, and S. A. Lavery. 2020. Elective Egg Freezing for Non-Medical Reasons. BJOG 127 Scientific Impact Paper No 63: e113–e121. “.” ).
Arora, K. S., and V. Blake. 2014. Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges. Journal of Medical Ethics 40: 396–400. “.” ).
Berkhout, Suze. 2012. Relational Autonomy on the Cutting Edge. The American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7): 59–61. “.” ( .
Benedet, Susana. 2019. Uterus transplantation fact sheet. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 98 (9): 1205–1206. “.” ( .
Blazier, Jaden, and Rien Janssens. 2020. Regulating the international surrogacy market:the ethics of commercial surrogacy in the Netherlands and India. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 23: 621–630. “.” ).
Boyd, Susan B. 2010. Autonomy for Mothers? Relational Theory and Parenting Apart. Feminist Legal Studies 18: 137–158. “.” ).
Browne, Tamara. 2017. How sex selection undermines reproductive autonomy. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14: 195–204. “.” ).
Burrow, Sylvia. 2012. Feminism, Autonomy & Reproductive Technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1): 31–44. “.”, ).
Catsanos, R., W. Rogers, and M. Lotz. 2013. The Ethics of Uterus Transplantation. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 27: 65–73. “.” ).
Denbow, J. M., “Reproductive, and Autonomy. 2014. Counter-Conduct, and the Juridical. Constellations 21: 415–424. ” ).
De Proost, Michiel, and Gily Coene. 2019. Women’s autonomy, reproductive justice, and social egg freezing. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies 22 (4): 357–371. “.” ( .
Donchin, A. 2009. Toward a Gender-Sensitive Assisted Reproduction Policy. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 23: 28–38. “.” ).
El-Toukhy, T., S. Bhattacharya, and Akande and V.A.“Multiple Pregnancies Following Assisted Conception.” BJOG 2018 Scientific Impact Paper No. 22.
Fraser, Melissa E. Summer 1998. Gender Inequality in In Vitro Fertilization: Controlling Women’s Reproductive Autonomy. New York City Law Review 2 (2): 183–210. “.” ( .
Goering, Sara. 2009. Postnatal reproductive autonomy: Promotional relational autonomy and self-trust in new parents. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 12 (1): 9–19. “.” ( .
Gruben, Vanessa. 2017. Freezing as Freedom: A Regulatory Approach to Elective Egg Freezing and Women’s Reproductive Autonomy. Alberta Law Review 54 (3): 753–774. “.” ( .
Gupta, J. A., and A. Richters. 2008. Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination. Bioethical Inquiry 5: 239–249. “.” ).
Hester, D. 2002. Reproductive Technologies as Instruments of Meaningful Parenting: Ethics in the Age of ARTs. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4): 401–410. “.” ( .
Hewinson, Jenny. 2015. Psychological Aspects of Individualized Choice and Reproductive Autonomy in Prenatal Screening. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 29 (1): 9–18. “.” ( .
Hewson, Barbara. “Reproductive autonomy and the ethics of abortion.” Journal of Medical Ethics 27. 2001. suppl II:ii10–ii14.
Harris, John. 2005. Reproductive liberty, disease and disability. Ethics Law and Moral Philosophy of Reproductive Biomedicine 1 (1): 13–16. “.” ( .
Harwood, Karey. 2009. Egg freezing: A breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 23 (1): 39–46. “” ( .
Jackson, Emily. 2001. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Johnston, Josephine, and Rachel L. Zacharias. 2017. “The Future of Reproductive Autonomy,” Just Reproduction: Reimagining Autonomy in Reproductive Medicine, special report. Hastings Center Report 47 (6): S6–S11.
Kaliarnta, S., J. Nihlén-Fahlquist, and S. Roeser. 2011. Emotions and ethical considerations of women undergoing IVF-treatments. HEC forum: an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals’ ethical and legal issues 23 (4): 281–293. “.” ( .
Kisu, I., Y. Kato, H. Obara, K. Matsubara, Y. Matoba, K. Banno, and D. Aokia. 2018. Emerging problems in uterus transplantation. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 125 (11): 1352–1356. “.” ( .
Knight, Amber, and Joshua Miller. 2021. Prenatal Genetic Screening, Epistemic Justice, and Reproductive Autonomy. Hypatia 36 (1): 1–21. “.” ( .
Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela. 2011. Reproductive Choices and Informed Consent: Fetal Interests, Women’s Identity, and Relational Autonomy. American Journal of Law & Medicine 37 (4): 567–623. “.” ( .
Lucke, Jayne C. 2012. Reproductive Autonomy Is an Illusion. The American Journal of Bioethics 12 (6): 44–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.671893. “.” ( : .
Mackenzie, Catriona. 2013. “The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability.”. In Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, eds. By Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds, 33–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mcleod, Carolyn. 2009. Rich discussion about reproductive autonomy. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 23: no. 1. “.” .
Mertes, H. 2015. Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women’s reproductive autonomy?”. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 32: 1205–1209. </bvertical-align:super;> ( .
Mills, Susan. 2003. Exploring the boundaries of reproductive autonomy. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 9: 87–93. “.” ).
Mills, Catherine. 2011. Futures of Reproduction: Bioethics and Biopolitics. Dordrecht: Springer.
O’Donovan, L. 2018. Pushing the boundaries: Uterine transplantation and the limits of reproductive autonomy. Memoir - American Association Of Petroleum Geologists 32: 489–498. “.” ).
O’Donovan, L., N. J. Williams, and S. Wilkinson. 2019. Ethical and policy issues raised by uterus transplants. British Medical Bulletin 131 (1): 19–28. “.” ( .
Peterson, M. M. 2005. Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5): 280–285. “.” ( .
Purdy, L. 2006. Women’s reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5): 287–291. “.” ( .
Richards, Martin. 2009. “Which Children can we Choose? Boundaries of Reproductive Autonomy.”. In Regulating Autonomy: Sex, Reproduction and Family. Ed by. Shelley Day Sclater, Fatemeh Ebtehaj, Emily Jackson, and Martin Richards, 197–222. Portland: Hart Publishing.
Robertson, J. A. 1982. The right to procreate and in utero fetal therapy. The Journal of Legal Medicine 3 (3): 333–366. “.” ( .
Rozée, V., S. Unisa, and E. de La Rochebrochard. 2020. The social paradoxes of commercial surrogacy in developing countries: India before the new law of 2018. BMC Women’s Health 20: 234. “.” ( : 1–14.
Rueda, John. “From Self-Determination to Offspring-Determination? Reproductive Autonomy, Procrustean Parenting, and Genetic Enhancement.” Theoria, Early View. 2022.
Ruhl, P., and Lealle. 2002. Disarticulating Liberal Subjectivities: Abortion and Fetal Protection. Feminist Studies 28 (1): 37–60. “.” ( .
Søbirk Petersen, T. A. 2004. Woman’s Choice? — On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7: 81–90. “.” ).
Steinfeld, Rebecca. “Surrogacy – wish fulfilment or exploitation?” Maternity Action, February 2020. https://maternityaction.org.uk/2020/02/surrogacy-wish-fulfilment-or-exploitation/.
Thachuk, Angela. 2007. Midwifery, Informed Choice, and Reproductive Autonomy: A Relational Approach. Feminism & Psychology 17 (1): 39–56. “.” ( .
Tsu, Peter. 2012. Shiu-Hwa. “Reproductive Autonomy and Normalization of Cesarean Section. American Journal of Bioethics 12, no (7): 61–62. ” ).
Van Zyl, L. 2002. Intentional Parenthood and the Nuclear Family. Journal of Medical Humanities 23: 107–118. “.” ).
Van Zyl, Liezl, and Anton Van Niekerk. 2000. Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood. Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 404–409. “.” ).
Weller, Chris. “What you need to know about egg-freezing, the hot new perk at Google, Apple, and Facebook.” Business Insider, 17 September 2017. https://www.businessinsider.com/egg-freezing-at-facebook-apple-google-hot-new-perk- 2017-9?r = US&IR = T.
Wilkinson, Stephen. May 2016. Exploitation in International Paid Surrogacy Arrangements. Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2): 125–145. “.” ( .
Wilkinson, Stephen, and Nicola James Williams. 2016. Should uterus transplants be publicly funded? Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 559–565. “” ).
Zeiler, K. 2004. Reproductive autonomous choice — A cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7 : <bvertical-align:super;> </bvertical-align:super;>175–183. “.”.
Funding
This work was supported by a VELUX-funded grant, “The Future of Family Relationships” [Project number: 00026589]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J. The limitations of liberal reproductive autonomy. Med Health Care and Philos 25, 523–529 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10097-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10097-w