Abstract
Schwartz and his colleagues have proposed individual differences in consumer decision goals. Maximizers are those who always strive to make the best possible decision, whereas satisficers are those who are usually willing to settle for a “good enough” option. In this study, we explore the influence of the maximizing trait in situations where consumers have to make quick purchase decisions. The context for our empirical study is online gift purchases made under a time constraint. The results support our predictions that maximizers (vs. satisficers) engage in more prepurchase browsing behavior and also perceive more decision time pressure. Furthermore, these effects are moderated by the size of the available choice assortment. The results also show that maximizers are more likely to change their initial time-constrained choices if given the opportunity to do so. We discuss the implications of the research for the study of individual differences in consumer behavior and also for customizing retail sales and Internet marketing tactics based on buyer segmentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, L. (1997). Late Xmas shoppers a boon to retailers. Marketing Magazine, 102(43), 2.
Boatwright, P., & Nunes, J. C. (2001). Reducing assortment: an attribute-based approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 50–63. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.3.50.18330.
Borle, S., Boatwright, P., Kadane, J. B., Nunes, J. C., & Shmueli, G. (2005). The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Science, 24(4), 616–622. doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0121.
Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. S. (2006). The dark side of choice: when choice impairs social welfare. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 24–38. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.1.24.
Broniarczyk, S. M. (2004). A deeper look at assortment. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 392–394.
Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D., & McAlister, L. (1998). Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: the impact of item reduction. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 166–176. doi:10.2307/3151845.
Chernev, A. (2006). Decision focus and consumer choice among assortments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 50–59. doi:10.1086/504135.
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231. doi:10.1086/209506.
Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 309–324. doi:10.1086/317587.
Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: evidence from a speed dating experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 673–697 (May). doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.673.
Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind. New York: Metropolitan.
Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety for sale: mass customization or mass confusion? Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 491–513. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80105-5.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143–150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x.
Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Kohn, C. A. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 63–69. doi:10.2307/3150994.
Kahn, B. E., & Lehmann, D. (1991). Modeling choice among assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67(3), 274–299.
Malhotra, N. (1982). Multi-stage information processing behavior: an experimental investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1, 54. doi:10.1007/BF02721899.
Maule, A. J., & Svenson, O. (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Springer.
Moorthy, S., Ratchford, B. T., & Talukdar, D. (1997). Consumer information search revisited: theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 263–277. doi:10.1086/209482.
Nowlis, S. M. (1995). The effect of time pressure on the choice between brands that differ in quality, price, and product features. Marketing Letters, 6, 287–295 (October). doi:10.1007/BF00996192.
Oppewal, H., & Koelemeijer, K. (1999). Assessing the effects of assortment and ambience: a choice experimental approach. Journal of Retailing, 75(3), 319–345. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00011-1.
Park, W. C., Iyer, E. S., & Smith, D. C. (1989). The effects of situational factors on in-store grocery shopping behavior: the role of store environment and time available for shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 422–433. doi:10.1086/209182.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1986). After the new wears off: the temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 280–285. doi:10.1086/209067.
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice—why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.
Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118. doi:10.2307/1884852.
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138. doi:10.1037/h0042769.
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49–68 (June). doi:10.1086/314308.
Urbany, J. E., Schmit, J. T., Butler, D. D., & Urbany, J. E. (1989). Buyer uncertainty and information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 208–215. doi:10.1086/209209.
Wright, P., & Weitz, B. (1977). Time horizon effects on product evaluation strategies. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 429–443 (November). doi:10.2307/3151184.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352 (December). doi:10.1086/208520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chowdhury, T.G., Ratneshwar, S. & Mohanty, P. The time-harried shopper: Exploring the differences between maximizers and satisficers. Mark Lett 20, 155–167 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9063-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9063-0