Abstract
Objective
To assess the preferences of women undergoing cesarean delivery regarding intraoperative conversations among healthcare personnel.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted by distribution of an open anonymous questionnaire on social media platforms during March 2022, targeting respondents with a history of cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was patients’ experience of “being disturbed by professional and casual conversations of the personnel”, rated on a 1–5 Likert scale.
Results
1203 participants completed the questionnaire, with 97.6% reporting intraoperative conversations among personnel. Casual conversations were perceived as “disturbing” by more respondents vs. professional talk (33.4% vs. 27.6%, respectively, p = 0.0077). Logistic regression analysis revealed associations between feeling disturbed and higher intraoperative stress and pain – adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–4.5, and OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.8–4.0, respectively, for professional conversations; OR 3.0, 95%CI 2.0–4.4, and OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1–2.7, respectively, for casual conversations. Feeling disturbed by professional conversations was also associated with urgent vs. elective operations (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.4-3.0). Direct personnel-patient communication was associated with significantly lower stress levels (60.8% vs. 72.5% in the remaining cohort, p < 0.001).
Discussion
Intraoperative conversations of the personnel occur during vast majority of cesarean deliveries. Given that a substantial proportion of patients find these conversations disturbing, it is advisable to conduct a preliminary assessment of maternal preferences. This proactive step can help tailor communication strategies to individual patient comfort and preferences, ultimately enhancing the birthing experience and maternal well-being.
Significance
This study delves into a crucial aspect of cesarean delivery - the impact of intraoperative conversations among healthcare personnel on women's experiences. The findings underscore the prevalence of such conversations during cesarean deliveries, with a notable proportion of women expressing disturbance, particularly by casual interactions. The association between feeling disturbed and increased intraoperative stress and pain highlights the potential implications for maternal well-being. Notably, the study emphasizes the positive role of direct personnel-patient communication in reducing stress levels, advocating for a more patient-centered approach.
Data Availability
The data is available on request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Abbott, J., & Abbott, P. (1995). Psychological and cardiovascular predictors of anaesthesia induction, operative and post-operative Complications in minor gynaecological Surgery. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1995.tb01495.x.
Bellani, M. L. (2008). Psychological aspects in day-case Surgery. International Journal of Surgery, 6 Suppl(1), 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.019.
Boeke, S., Stronks, D., Verhage, F., & Zwaveling, A. (1991). Psychological variables as predictors of the length of post-operative hospitalization. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 35(2–3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(91)90082-y.
Boerma, T., Ronsmans, C., Melesse, D. Y., Barros, A. J. D., Barros, F. C., Juan, L., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet, 392(10155), 1341–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
Bucklin, B. A., Hawkins, J. L., Anderson, J. R., & Ullrich, F. A. (2005). Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: Twenty-year update. Anesthesiology, 103(3), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030.
Caddick, J., Jawad, S., Southern, S., & Majumder, S. (2012). The power of words: Sources of anxiety in patients undergoing local anaesthetic plastic Surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 94(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221501267.
Chen, D. C., Nommsen-Rivers, L., Dewey, K. G., & Lonnerdal, B. (1998). Stress during labor and delivery and early lactation performance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68(2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/68.2.335.
Chit Ying, L., Levy, V., Oi Shan, C., Hung, W., T., & Wah, K., W (2001). A qualitative study of the perceptions of Hong Kong Chinese women during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. Midwifery, 17(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2000.0249.
Dimitraki, M., Tsikouras, P., Manav, B., Gioka, T., Koutlaki, N., Zervoudis, S., & Galazios, G. (2016). Evaluation of the effect of natural and emotional stress of labor on lactation and breast-feeding. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 293(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3783-1.
Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for reporting results of internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.
Gill, J., & Clark, J. P. (2010). Research Methods for Managers (p. 288). Sage Publications Ltd.
Grajeda, R., & Perez-Escamilla, R. (2002). Stress during labor and delivery is associated with delayed onset of lactation among urban Guatemalan women. Journal of Nutrition, 132(10), 3055–3060. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.10.3055.
Grisbrook, M. A., Dewey, D., Cuthbert, C., McDonald, S., Ntanda, H., Giesbrecht, G. F., & Letourneau, N. (2022). Associations among caesarean section birth, post-traumatic stress, and postpartum depression symptoms. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084900
Hansen, E., & Bejenke, C. (2010). [Negative and positive suggestions in anaesthesia: Improved communication with anxious surgical patients]. Der Anaesthesist, 59(3), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1679-9. 204 – 196, 208 – 199.
Haugen, A. S., Eide, G. E., Olsen, M. V., Haukeland, B., Remme, A. R., & Wahl, A. K. (2009). Anxiety in the operating theatre: A study of frequency and environmental impact in patients having local, plexus or regional anaesthesia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(16), 2301–2310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02792.x.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Page, G. G., Marucha, P. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Glaser, R. (1998). Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. American Psychologist, 53(11), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.53.11.1209.
Lester, G. W., & Smith, S. G. (1993). Listening and talking to patients. A remedy for malpractice suits? Western Journal of Medicine, 158(3), 268–272.
Levinson, W., Roter, D. L., Mullooly, J. P., Dull, V. T., & Frankel, R. M. (1997). Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(7), 553–559. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.7.553.
Osborn, T. M., & Sandler, N. A. (2004). The effects of preoperative anxiety on intravenous sedation. Anesthesia Progress, 51(2), 46–51.
Smith, C. S., Guyton, K., Pariser, J. J., Siegler, M., Schindler, N., & Langerman, A. (2017). Surgeon-patient communication during awake procedures. American Journal of Surgery, 213(6), 996–1002e1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.017.
Vusqa, U. T., Liaqat, H., Ejaz, T., & Safdar, S. A. (2019). The influence of operation theatre environment on patients’ perceptions during awake procedures: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 69(10), 1521–1525.
Williams, O. A. (1993). Patient knowledge of operative care. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 86(6), 328–331.
Acknowledgements
Sincere gratitude and appreciation are expressed to Mrs. Moran Echar from the Genetics Institute at Carmel Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, for her invaluable assistance in coding the open responses; to Mrs. Nilli Stein from Carmel Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, for her expertise in conducting the statistical analysis, and lastly, to all the women who participated in the survey, as their contributions played a pivotal role in this study.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LSD: Contributed to conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Ethical Approval
None (waived by the institutional review board).
Consent to Participate
None (waived by the institutional review board).
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sagi-Dain, L. “We hear and we fear” – Insights of 1203 Women on Personnel Conversations During Cesarean Delivery. Matern Child Health J 28, 198–205 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03852-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03852-9