Skip to main content
Log in

Our even

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss a phenomenon that appears when ‘even’ occurs in questions. Specifically, an inference of what we call “extreme ignorance” is projected onto the speaker. We argue that this effect arises when the known unlikelihood ‘even’ focuses an entire question, resulting in the focused question being the least likely to be asked. Specific implicatures then conspire to bring about the inference that the speaker does not know the answer to the question that is most expected to be known. The environments explored are Wh-questions and Y/N questions, and the languages looked at primarily English, Greek, German and Russian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, J. (2006). Generalized domain widening überhaupt. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 58–66). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1980). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buering, D. (2003). On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 511–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlow, N. (2011). Practical language: its meaning and use. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crnic, L. (2011). Getting even. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Crnic, L. (2013). How to get even with desires and imperatives. In E. Csipak, R. Eckardt, & M. Sailer (Eds.), Beyond any and ever (pp. 127–154). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D., & Roelofsen, F. (2015). Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. Unpublished ms.

  • Fillmore, Ch., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., & Hackl, M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, 537–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francescotti, R. (1995). Even: The conventional implicature approach reconsidered. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski, J. (2002). L-analyticity in natural language. Ms. MIT.

  • Giannakidou, A. (2007). The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 39–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Y. (2015). Even, comparative likelihood and gradability. In T. Brochhagen, F. Roelofsen, & N. Theiler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 147–156). Amsterdam: ILLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerzoni, E. (2004). Even-NPIs in yes/no questions. Natural Language Semantics, 12, 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerzoni, E., & Lim, D. (2007). Even if, factivity and focus. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu.

  • Haegeman, L. (2014). West flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica, 68, 116–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haida, A., & Repp, S. (2012). Only in imperatives. In A. Aguilar, A. Chernilovskaya, & R. Nouwen (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C.-H. (2002). Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua, 112, 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herburger, E. (2000). What counts: Focus and quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, V. (2007). Vocatives and the pragmatics–syntax interface. Lingua, 117, 2077–2105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In R. I. Binnick, A. Davison, G. Green, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Papers from the 5th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 4, pp. 97–108). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Horn, L. (2013). Licensing NPIs: Some negative (and positive) results. Ms., Yale University.

  • Karttunen, L. (1977). Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, F., & Karttunen, L. (1977). Even questions. NELS, 7, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L., & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. In C. Oh & D. Dineen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 11: Presuppositions (pp. 1–56). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, M. (2012). Interpreting imperatives. Studies in linguistics and philosophy 88. New York: Springer.

  • Kay, P. (1990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1992). A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Volume Sonderheft 4 of Linguistische Berichte (pp. 17–53). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

  • Krifka, M. (2001). Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (2012). Embedding speech acts. Ms.

  • Krifka, M. (2014). Embedding illocutionary acts. In T. Roeper & M. Speas (Eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition (pp. 59–87). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U. (1998). Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 57–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linebarger, M. (1987). Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, 325–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, P., Matthewson, L., & Peterson, T. (2010). On the semantics of conjectural questions. In T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence from evidentials (Vol. 28, pp. 89–104). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Lycan, W. G. (1991). Even and even if. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 115–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, J. (1999). Interrogative quantifiers within scope. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 255–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Esponda, T. (2014). A discourse model for überhaupt. Semantics and Pragmatics, 7, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Rullmann, H. (1997). Even, polarity, and scope. In M. Gibson, G. Wiebe, & G. Libben (Eds.), Papers in experimental and theoretical linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 40–64). Edmonton, AB: Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U. (2009). Decomposing question acts. Snippets, 20, 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U., & Yatsushiro, K. (2014). Remind-me presuppositions and Speech-Act Decomposition: Japanese kke and German wieder. Ms., ZAS Berlin.

  • Shanon, B. (1976). On the two kinds of presupposition in natural language. Foundations of Language, 14(2), 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197–213). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toosarvandandi, M. (2010). Letting negative polarity alone for let alone. In T. Friedman & S. Ito (Eds.), SALT XVIII. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kuppevelt, J. (1995a). Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 109–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kuppevelt, J. (1995b). Main structure and side structure in discourse. Linguistics, 33, 809–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kuppevelt, J. (1996). Inferring from topics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 393–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K. (1993). Exceptive constructions. Natural Language Semantics, 1(2), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K. (1999). NPI licensing, Strawson entailment, and context dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16(2), 97–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K. (2004). Would you believe it? The King of France is back! (presuppositions and truth-value intuitions). In M. Reimer & A. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Descriptions and beyond (pp. 315–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, A. (1991). Current issues in the theory of focus. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 804–825). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2014). Additivity and the syntax of Even. Ms., McGill University.

  • Wilkinson, K. (1996). The scope of even. Natural Language Semantics, 4, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Iatridou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iatridou, S., Tatevosov, S. Our even . Linguist and Philos 39, 295–331 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9190-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9190-7

Keywords

Navigation