Skip to main content
Log in

Choice of time scale for analysis of recurrent events data

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recurrent events refer to events that over time can occur several times for each individual. Full use of such data in a clinical trial requires a method that addresses the dependence between events. For modelling this dependence, there are two time scales to consider, namely time since start of the study (running time) or time since most recent event (gap time). In the multi-state setup, it is possible to estimate parameters also in the case, where the hazard model allows for an effect of both time scales, making this an extremely flexible approach. However, for summarizing the effect of a treatment in a transparent and informative way, the choice of time scale and model requires much more care. This paper discusses these choices both from a theoretical and practical point of view. This is supported by a simulation study showing that in a frailty model with assumptions covered by both time scales, the gap time approach may give misleading results. A literature dataset is used for illustrating the issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen O, Cook R, Røysland K (2015) Does cox analysis of a randomized survival study yield a causal treatment effect? Lifetime Data Anal 21:579–593

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aalen O, Johansen S (1978) An empirical transition matrix for non-homogeneous markov chains based on censored observations. Scand J Statist 5:141–150

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook R, Lawless J (2007) The statistical analysis of recurrent events. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch A, Schlomer P, Mendolia F, Mutze T, Jahn-Eimermacher A, Roger J (2021) Efficiency comparison of analysis methods for recurrent event and time-to-first-event endpoints application to clinical trials in chronic heart failure. Statist Biopharm Res (online early). https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2021.1945488

  • Gonzalez J, Fernandez E, Moreno V, Ribes J, Peris M, Navarro M, Cambray M, Borras J (2005) Sex differences in hospital readmission among colorectal cancer patients. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:506–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2019) Addendum on estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials to the guideline on statistical principles for clinical trials E9(R1), International Council for Harmonisation

  • Lawless J, Nadeau C (1995) Some simple robust methods for the analysis of recurrent events. Technometrics 37:158–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Wei L (1989) The robust inference for the cox proportional hazards model. J Am Statist Assoc 84:1074–1078

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Wei L, Yang I, Ying Z (2000) Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events. J R Statist Soc B 62:711–730

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1982) A model for association in bivariate survival data. J R Statist Soc B 44:414–422

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1989) Bivariate survival models induced by frailties. J Am Statist Assoc 84:487–493

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice R, Williams B, Peterson A (1981) On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 68:373–379

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rondeau V, Mazroui Y, Gonzalez J (2012) frailtypack: an r package for the analysis of correlated survival data with frailty models using penalized likelihood estimation or parametrical estimation. J Statist Softw 47:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidli H, Roger J, Akacha M (2021) Estimands for recurrent event endpoints in the presence of a terminal event. Statist Biopharm Res (online early). https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2021.1895883

  • Therneau T, Grambsch P (2000) Modeling survival data. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Mutze T, Jahn-Eimermacher A, Roger J (2021) Properties of two while-alive estimands for recurrent events and their potential estimators. Statist Biopharm Res (online early). https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2021.1994457

Download references

Acknowledgements

The comments from Henrik Ravn on an earlier version of this paper are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Hougaard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hougaard, P. Choice of time scale for analysis of recurrent events data. Lifetime Data Anal 28, 700–722 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1

Keywords

Navigation