Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore a new learning environment instrument which could be used by teaching practitioners and other educators to measure the language learning environment in the secondary science classroom. The science teacher is central in creating science classrooms conductive to the language needs of students and should be promoting the learning of language in the science curriculum and in the teaching strategies with English as second language learners. The data in this study were collected using a structured self-administered survey with a sample of 240 secondary school students from eight science classrooms. Factor analysis identified five dimensions, namely, Teacher Support, Vocabulary Development, Assessment, Motivation and Language for Learning Science. These five dimensions explained 56.9% of the variance in the language learning environment instrument. The internal reliability of the dimensions using Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.603 to 0.830. The study revealed significant differences in the dimensions of the language learning environment between what the students perceived to actually be occurring to what they would prefer. Implications from this preliminary research include the ability for measuring the language learning environment in the secondary science class and the potential for practitioners to use the information to develop teaching strategies conducive to learning for all students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. The British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.
Buck, G., Mast, C., Ehlers, N., & Franklin, E. (2005). Preparing teachers to create mainstream science classroom conductive to the needs of English language learners: A feminist action research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 1013–1031. doi:10.1002/tea.20085.
Claire, E., & Haynes, J. (1994). Classroom teacher’s ESL Survival Kit 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Facella, M. A., Rampino, K. M., & Shea, E. K. (2005). Effective teaching strategies for bilingual learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 209–220.
Fradd, S., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers’ roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 14–20.
Franklin, E., & Buck, G. (2002, April). Learning the language of science: A case study of second language learners in a science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Antecedents, consequences and evaluation (pp. 3–27). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33. doi:10.1023/A:1009932514731.
Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Science learning environments: Assessments effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 10.0 update (3rd ed.). Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1883). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrel, D. T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
Laplante, B. (1997). Teachers’ beliefs and instructional strategies in science: Pushing analysis further. Science Education, 81, 277–294. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199706)81:3<277::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-A.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language learning and values. Norward, NJ: Albex.
Lim, H. L., & Watson, D. (1993). Whole language content classes for second language learners. The Reading Teacher, 46, 384–393.
Logan, K. A., Crump, B. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2006). Measuring the computer classroom environment: Lessons learned from using a new instrument. Learning Environments Research, 9, 67–93. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-9004-2.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Kong, C. (2000). Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: Achievement growth in language and non-language subjects. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 203–346.
Moos, R. H. (1973). Conceptualisations of human environments. The American Psychologist, 28, 652–665. doi:10.1037/h0035722.
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. New York: Wiley.
Nunnally, T. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
Rice, D. C., Pappmihiel, N. W., & Lake, V. E. (2004). Lesson adaptations and accommodations: Working with native speakers and English language learners in the same science classroom. Childhood Education, 80, 121–127.
Short, D. J. (2000). The ESL standards: Bridging the academic gap for English language learners. ERIC Digest. ED447728, Washington, DC: ERIC Digest.
Sleeter, C. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 94–106. doi:10.1177/0022487101052002002.
Sutman, F., Guzman, A., & Schwartz, W. (1993). Teaching science effectively to limited English proficient students. ERIC/CUE Digest, 87.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Northridge, CA: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Taylor, P., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2.
Walberg, H., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419. doi:10.1037/h0026490.
Watson, S. (2004). Opening the science doorway. Science Teacher, 71(2), 32–35.
Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). Accounting for variation in science and mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of Australian data. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 339–360. doi:10.1076/0924-3453(200009)11:3;1-G;FT339.
Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). School-level environment and student outcomes in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 6, 309–326. doi:10.1023/A:1027383925394.
Yip, D. Y., Tsang, W. K., & Cheung, S. P. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong students: Performance on science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 295–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webster, B.J., Hazari, A. Measuring language learning environments in secondary science classrooms. Learning Environ Res 12, 131–142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9055-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9055-x