Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The quantitative relation between ambient soundscapes and landscape development intensity in North Central Florida

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

It is widely accepted that wildlife is subjected to detrimental human noise within urban landscapes but little is known about how the intensity of land use changes soundscapes.

Objectives

The objective of this research was to produce quantitative associations between characteristics of ambient soundscapes and land use intensity. These relations were used to examine the 2 kHz demarcation between anthrophony and biophony and compare the impact of different sized contributing areas on ambient soundscape characteristics.

Methods

This study related the surrounding land use intensity of 67 sites in north central Florida (USA) to several metrics describing their recorded soundscapes. Land use intensity was measured remotely at three scales using the landscape development intensity index (LDI).

Results

The analysis revealed that the LDI index had a statistically significant effect on soundscape characteristics after controlling for important factors such as climate, season, and attenuation due to hard ground. The trends between LDI and soundscape confirmed that human generated sounds are loud, continuous, and occupy low frequencies. The evenness of the sound distribution decreased with landscape intensity and LDI correlated significantly with sound below 3 kHz. Land use intensity within a 100 and 500-m radius contributing area were most closely related to soundscape metrics.

Conclusions

LDI is a tool with the potential to predict the extent and intensity of anthropogenic noise disturbance on wildlife from remote sensing data. The utility of this tool allows for widespread application to identify and mitigate conflicts in the acoustic realm between human noise and wildlife.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25(3):180–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne EM, Habib L, Boutin S (2008) Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy-sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest. Conserv Biol 22(5):1186–1193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bee M, Swanson EM (2007) Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise. Anim Behav 74(6):1765–1776

    Google Scholar 

  • Bioacoustics Research Program (2011) Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 14) [Computer software]. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithica

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard M (2009) Wetland resources of Eastern South Dakota; drainage patterns, assessment techniques, and predicting future risks. South Dakota State University, South Dakota

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MT, Vivas MB (2005) Landscape development intensity index. Environ Monit Assess 101(1–3):289–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunni A, Daniel JM, Foote JR (2014) Dawn chorus start time variation in a temperate bird community: relationships with seasonality, weather, and ambient light. J Ornithol 155(4):877–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Can A, Leclercq L, Lelong J, Botteldooren D (2010) Traffic noise spectrum analysis: dynamic modeling vs experimental observations. Appl Acoust 71(8):764–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Charif RA, Waack AM, Strickman LM (2010) Raven pro 1.4 user’s manual. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithica

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen TS, Lin HJ (2011) Application of a landscape development intensity index for assessing wetlands in Taiwan. Wetlands 31(4):745–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Gasc A, Duvail S, Sueur J (2012) Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Ind 13(1):46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling RJ, Popper A (2007) The effects of highway noise on birds. Environmental BioAcoustics LLC, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2014) ArcGIS desktop: release 10.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina A, Pieretti N (2014) Sonic environment and vegetation structure: a methodological approach for a soundscape analysis of a Mediterranean maqui. Ecol Inform 21:120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • FGDL Metadata Explorer (2015) University of Florida GeoPlan Center, Gainesville

  • Fonseca PJ, Revez MA (2002) Temperature dependence of cicada songs (Homoptera, Cicadoidea). J Comp Physiol 187:971–976

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fore LS (2004) Development and testing of biomonitoring tools for macroinvertebrates in Florida streams. Statistical Design, Seattle, Washington. A report for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, p 62

  • Fore LS (2005) Assessing the biological condition of Florida lakes: development of the lake vegetation index (LDV). Statistical Design, Seattle, Washington. A report for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, p 29 & Appendixes

  • Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller S, Axel AC, Tucker D, Gage SH (2015) Connecting soundscape to landscape: which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration? Ecol Ind 58:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Axel AC (2014) Visualization of temporal change in soundscape power of a Michigan lake habitat over a 4-year period. Ecol Inform 21:100–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib L, Bayne EM, Boutin S (2007) Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. J Appl Ecol 44(1):176–184

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1993) Acoustics—Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors—part 1: calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere (Standard No. 9613-1). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1996) Acoustics—Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors—part 2: general method of calculation (Standard No. 9613-2). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo W (2009) Environmental acoustics as an ecological variable to understand the dynamics of ecosystems. Dissertation. Michigan State University

  • Joo W, Gage SH, Kasten EP (2011) Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urban–rural gradient. Landsc Urban Plan 103(3–4):259–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecol Inform 12:50–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kociolek AV, Clevenger AP, St Clair CC, Proppe DS (2011) Effects of road networks on bird populations. Conserv Biol 25(2):241–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause BL, Gage SH, Joo W (2011) Measuring and interpreting the temporal variability in the soundscape at four places in Sequoia National Park. Landsc Ecol 26(9):1247–1256

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiolo P (2010) The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biol Conserv 143(7):1635–1645

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane CR, Brown MT (2007) Diatoms as indicators of wetland condition. Ecol Ind 7:521–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack JJ (2006) Landscape as a predictor of wetland condition: an evaluation of the Landscape Development Index (LDI) with a large reference wetland dataset from Ohio. Environ Monit Assess 120:221–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makarewicz R, Sato Y (1996) Representative spectrum of road traffic noise. J Acoust Soc Jpn 5:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Margriter SC, Bruland GL, Kudray GM, Lepczyk CA (2014) Using indicators of land-use development intensity to assess the condition of coastal wetlands in Hawaii. Landsc Ecol 29(3):517–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (1955) Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsinos YG, Mazaris AD, Papadimitriou KD, Mniestris A, Hatzigiannidis G, Maioglou D, Pantis JD (2008) Spatio-temporal variability in human and natural sounds in a rural landscape. Landsc Ecol 23:945–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Chatzigianidis G, Papadimitriou K, Pantis JD (2009) Spatiotemporal analysis of an acoustic environment: interactions between landscape features and sounds. Landsc Ecol 24(6):817–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennitt DJ, Fristrup KM (2016) Influential factors and spatiotemporal patterns of environmental sound levels in the contiguous United States. Noise Control Eng 64(3):342–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoletano BM (2004) Measurement, quantification and interpretation of acoustic signals within an ecological context. Dissertation. Michigan State University

  • Nega T, Yaffe N, Stewart N, Fu WH (2013) The impact of road traffic noise on urban protected areas: a landscape modeling approach. Trans Res Part D 23:98–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver L, Lehrter J, Fisher W (2011) Relating landscape development intensity to coral reef condition in the watersheds of St. Croix, US Virgin Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 427:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieretti N, Farina A (2013) Application of a recently introduced index for acoustic complexity to an avian soundscape with traffic noise. J Acoust Soc Am 134(1):891–900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski BC, Farina A, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL (2011a) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol 26:1213–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Farina A, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Pieretti N (2011b) Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. Bioscience 61(3):203–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi J, Gage SH, Joo W, Napoletano BM, Biswas S (2008) Soundscape characteristics of an environment: a new ecological indicator of ecosystem Health. Wetland and water resource modeling and assessment: a watershed perspective. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, pp 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss KC, Brown MT, Lane CR (2010) Characteristic community structure of Florida’s subtropical wetlands: the Florida wetland condition index for depressional marshes, depressional forested, and flowing water forested wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manag 18(5):543–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer MR (1977) The tuning of the world. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SJRWMD (2012) St. Johns River water supply impact study (Technical Publication SJ2012-1). St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka

    Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester E (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17(1):72–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stacier CA, Spector DA, Horn AG (1996) The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signaling. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, pp 426–453

  • StataCorp (2013) Stata statistical software: release 13. StataCorp LP, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Suer J, Sanborn AF (2003) Ambient temperature and sound power of cicada calling songs (Hemiptera: cicadidae: Tibicini). Physiol Entomol 28:340–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S (2014) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 100(4):772–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax B (2001) Acoustic communication, 2nd edn. Ablex, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker D, Gage SH, Williamson I, Fuller S (2014) Linking ecological condition and the soundscape in fragmented Australian forests. Landsc Ecol 29(4):745–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware HE, McClure CJW, Carlisle JD, Barber JR (2015) A phantom road experiment reveals traffic noise is an invisible source of habitat degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(39):12105–12109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren PS, Katti M, Ermann M, Brazel A (2006) Urban bioacoustics: it’s not just noise. Anim Behav 71(3):491–502

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gary Siebein, Peter Frederick, Barron Henderson, Erica Hernandez, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research project received support from the HT Odum Center for Wetlands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment, Howard T. Odum Center for Wetlands, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Jenet M. Dooley

  2. Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Mark T. Brown

  3. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Jenet M. Dooley

Authors
  1. Jenet M. Dooley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark T. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenet M. Dooley.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dooley, J.M., Brown, M.T. The quantitative relation between ambient soundscapes and landscape development intensity in North Central Florida. Landscape Ecol 35, 113–127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00936-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00936-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation