Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Omnus et Singulatim’: Establishing the Relationship Between Transitional Justice and Neoliberalism

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First developed by human rights lawyers and activists, transitional justice emerged from the so-called third wave of democratisations in Latin America. Over the last 30 years, transitional justice has risen to become a ‘global project’ of global governance. Locating the emergence of transitional justice within the global rise of neoliberalism, this article shows that transitional justice serves an important function in regards to the particularly neoliberal contours of many transitions. Understanding this relation, the article argues, is best served with recourse to what Wendy Brown describes as neoliberalism’s practice of omnus et singulatim, a double process through which ‘communities’ are gathered together as stakeholders to take part in economic activities whilst simultaneously being individualised as ‘responsibilised’ and self-sufficient entrepreneurial units. Taking this concept, I argue that transitional justice also undertakes a process of omnus et singulatim that usefully prefigures and supports processes of neoliberalisation during ‘transition’. Transitional justice, it concludes, does the necessary work of bringing conflictual, traumatised, societies back together, whilst doing so on terms that do not threaten but instead prefigure the individualising demands made upon subjects at the sites of neoliberal transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Dardot and Laval (2013, pp. 40–55) show that the term ‘neo-liberalism’ was coined and deployed in the early part of the twentieth century by neoliberal intellectuals such as Louis Rougier and Gaëtan Pirou. The term ‘neo-liberalism’ eventually distinguished this body of thought from the ‘new’ liberalism, that is now mostly associated with the Keynesianism that dominated economic policy in the middle of the twentieth century.

  2. Foucault uses the spelling ‘Omnes’ rather than ‘Omnus’.

  3. Although, interestingly, the phrase, omnes et singulatim, is not used within the lecture apart from its title, making it one of Foucault’s less developed terms.

  4. Compounding this issue, as Mirowski points out, committed neoliberals might themselves reject this label.

  5. Although I alert the reader to the recent histories of human rights undertaken by Moyn (2012, 2014), which demonstrate that transitional justice and human rights emerged as a hardy ‘utopia’ that responded to the dramatic failures of the more programmatic visions of society offered by socialism, Keynesianism and so on. In this respect, one could certainly speculate that transitional justice became popular in policy circles because its own ‘pragmatic’ and ‘realistic’ micro-utopianism did not threaten, and, in fact, could compliment neoliberal policies which were often framed in terms of their own ‘realism’ or ‘pragmatism’.

  6. I use ‘sound’ here to denote competitive tax rates; a smaller, more efficient public sector; and so on. The point is that the Sierra Leonean TRC readily incorporated neoliberal assumptions that the economy is not a political but a technocratic formation that can be optimised to work for everyone.

  7. Socio-economic victimisation, for instance.

References

  • Andrieu, Kora. 2010. Civilizing peacebuilding: Transitional justice, civil society and the liberal paradigm. Security Dialogue 41(5): 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, Paige. 2009. How ‘transitions’ reshaped human rights: A conceptual history of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly 31: 321–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspen Institute. 1989. State crimes: Punishment or pardon? Maryland: Justice and Society Program of the Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, Alain. 2001. Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. (trans: Hallward, P.). London: Verson.

  • Bond, Patrick. 2000. Elite transition: From apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2006. Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2013. The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Greiff, Pablo. 2015. Transitional justice and development. Retrieved 11 May 2016, from Development Ideas http://www.developmentideas.info/website/wp-content/uploads/Ch24_TransitionalJustice_PablodeGreiff_2013.pdf.

  • de Greiff, Pablo. 2010. Transitional justice, security and development. Washington: World Bank. Retrieved 8 Sept 2015, from http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website01306/web/pdf/wdr%20background%20paper_de%20greiff_0.pdf.

  • Dukalskis, Alexander. 2011. Interactions in transition: How truth commissions and trials compliment or constrain each other. International Studies Review 13 (3): 432–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, Gérard, and Dominique Lévy. 2011. The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Karin. 2009. The influence of neoliberals in Chile before, during, and after Pinochet. In The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, ed. P. Mirowski, and D. Plehwe, 305–346. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1998 [1979]. The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

  • Foucault, Michel. 2000. Omnes et singulatim: Towards a critique of political reason. In Power: The essential works of Foucault, vol. 3, ed. J. Faubion. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2010. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzki, Hannah, and Maria Carolina Olarte. 2014. Understanding the political economy of transitional justice. In Transitional justice theories, ed. S. Buckley-Zistel, T.K. Beck, C. Braun, and F. Mieth, 201–221. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin Phelps, Teresa. 2004. Shattered voices: Language, violence and the work of truth commissions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, Alice H. 1989. Conference report. In State crimes: Punishment or pardon, ed. A. Institute, 1–9. Maryland: The Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Naomi. 2007. The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritz, Neil J. (ed.). 1995. Transitional justice: How emerging democracies reckon with former regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, Lisa J. 2009. Outlawing amnesty: The return of criminal justice in transitional justice schemes. Virginia Journal of International Law 50 (1): 916–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, Rama. 2002. Beyond retribution: Seeking justice in the shadows of war. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, Robert. 2011. After evil: A politics of human rights. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Zinaida. 2008. Effects of invisibility: In search of the ‘economic’ in transitional justice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 266–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minow, Martha. 1999. The work of re-membering: After genocide and mass atrocity. Fordham International Law Journal 23 (2): 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, Martha. 2000. The hope for healing: What can truth commissions do? In Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions, eds. R.I. Rotberg, and D. Thompson, 235–260. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 2013. Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Claire. 2008. Narrating political reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, Samuel. 2012. The last utopia: Human rights in history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, Samuel. 2014. Human rights and the uses of history. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutua, Makau Wa. 2001. Savages, victims and saviours: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal 24 (1): 201–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, Rosemary. 2008. Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly 29 (2): 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odysseos, Louiza. 2010. Human rights, liberal ontogenesis and freedom: Producing a subject for neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38: 747–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Aihwa. 2007. Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32 (1): 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, Michael. 2005. The political economy of peacebuilding: A political economy perspective. International Journal of Peace Studies 10 (2): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Jason. 2009. A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies 6: 25–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, Judith. 2015. Producing the subjects of reconciliation: The making of Sierra Leoneans as victims and perpetrators of past human rights violations. Third World Quarterly 36 (6): 1110–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, and Javier Mariezcurrena (eds.). 2006. Transitional justice in the 21st century: Beyond truth versus justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Leone Truth Reconciliation Commission (SLTRC). 2004. Witness to truth: The report of the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Volume 2. Retrieved 4 July 2014, from http://www.sierraleonetrc.org/index.php/view-the-final-report/download-table-of-contents.

  • Sriram, Chandra L. 2007. Justice as peace? Liberal peacebuilding and strategies of transitional justice. Global Society 21 (4): 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2013. The price of inequality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambling, Jeremy. 1990. Confession: Sexuality, sin, the subject. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Catherine. 2013. Deconstructing transitional justice. Law and Critique 24 (2): 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My thanks to Tom Harding and Stefanie Petschick, whose comments on an earlier draft of this article helped to sharpen its style and content. I also thank the reviewers for their helpful comments, which have greatly improved the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josh Bowsher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowsher, J. ‘Omnus et Singulatim’: Establishing the Relationship Between Transitional Justice and Neoliberalism. Law Critique 29, 83–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9198-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9198-3

Keywords

Navigation