Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Wetting Properties of Three Commonly Used Simulated Intestinal Fluids Used as Dissolution Media in the Characterization of Drugs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulated intestinal fluids (SIFs) are described in the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) and the International Pharmacopoeia (IntPh) as recommended dissolution media for the characterization of solid drugs. This study was carried out to compare their wettability properties. Six different model substrates were used as surrogates for solid drugs. These surrogate solid substrates were characterized by the Lifshitz-van der Waals, electron donor and electron acceptor terms, which are the three components of the total surface energy obtained by the van Oss model, which is based upon Young’s equation. Contact angles of the SIFs on the surrogate solid-substrates were determined dynamically by image analysis up to five minutes after applying a drop of the fluid on the solid surface. Observed time-dependent spreading behavior was accounted for by a linear extrapolation of the experimental data to zero contact time to obtain the apparent equilibrium contact angle at zero time. Additionally, the pH, osmolality and buffer capacity of the SIFs were experimentally determined. Although some differences in osmolality and buffer capacity were observed, no statistically significant differences in the wetting properties of the three SIFs were detected. This confirms recent findings that there are no observed differences in dissolution behavior among these simulated intestinal fluids. Harmonization of these SIFs is thus recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dressman, J., Krämer, J.: Pharmaceutical Dissolution Testing. Taylor and Francis Informa, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Young, D., Devane, J., Butler, J.: In vitro–in vivo correlations. Plenum, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Pharmacopoeia, European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines of the Council of Europe (EDQM), Strassbourg, France, 5th edn. (2005)

  4. Stippler, E., Kopp, S., Dressman, J.B.: Comparison of US Pharmacopeia Simulated Intestinal Fluid TS (without pancreatin) and phosphate standard buffer pH 6.8, TS of the International Pharmacopoeia with respect to their use in in vitro dissolution testing. Dissol. Technol. 11, 6–10 (2004)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc., Rockville, USA, 26th edn. (2003)

  6. The International Pharmacopoeia, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 3rd (1979) and 5th (2003) edns.

  7. Amidon, G.L., Lennernas, H., Shah, V.P., Crison, J.R.: A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 12, 413–420 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parfitt, G.D.: Dispersion of powders in liquids, 2nd edn. Applied Science, London (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dove, J.W., Buckton, G., Doherty, C.: A comparison of two contact angle measurement methods and inverse gas chromatography to assess the surface energies of theophylline and caffeine. Int. J. Pharm. 138, 199–206 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Luner, P.E.: Wetting properties of bile salt solutions and dissolution media. J. Pharm. Sci. 89, 382–395 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu, Y.: In Encyclopedia of Surface and Colloid Science, 1st edn. Hubbard, A. ed., Dekker, New York, pp. 1213–1215 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Oss, C.J., Good, R.J., Chaudhury, M.K.: Additive and nonadditive surface-tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir 4, 884–891 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh, E., Luner, P.E.: Surface free energy of ethylcellulose films and the influence of plasticizers. Int. J. Pharm. 188, 203–219 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Muster, T.H., Prestidge, C.A.: Application of time-dependent sessile drop contact angles on compacts to characterize the surface energetics of sulfathiazole crystals. Int. J. Pharm. 234, 43–54 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Remoortere, P., Joos, P.: About the kinetics of partial wetting. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 160, 387–396 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi, J.Y., Lee, H.G.: Wetting of solid Al2O3 with molten CaO-Al2O3-SiO2. ISIJ Int. 43, 1348–1355 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Galet, L., Vu, T., Oulahna, D., Fages, J.: The wetting behaviour and dispersion rate of cocoa powder in water. Food Bioprod. Process. 82, 298–303 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Michel, T., Mock, U., Roisman, I.V., Ruhe, J., Tropea, C.: The hydrodynamics of drop impact onto chemically structured surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S607–S622 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luner, P.E., Vander Kamp, D.: Wetting behaviour of bile salt-lipid dispersions and dissolution media patterned after intestinal fluids. J. Pharm. Sci. 90, 348–359 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buckton, G.: Surface characterization—understanding sources of variability in the production and use of pharmaceuticals J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 47, 265–275 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, D., Flory, J.H., Panmai, S., Batra, U., Kaufman, M.J.: Wettability of pharmaceutical solids: its measurement and influence on wet granulation. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 206, 547–554 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Turunen, M.P.K., Laurila, T., Kivilahti, J.K.: Evaluation of the surface free energy of spin-coated photodefinable epoxy. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 40, 2137–2149 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart De Spiegeleer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Spiegeleer, B., Baert, B., Vangheluwe, E. et al. Comparison of the Wetting Properties of Three Commonly Used Simulated Intestinal Fluids Used as Dissolution Media in the Characterization of Drugs. J Solution Chem 36, 835–843 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-007-9150-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-007-9150-5

Keywords

Navigation