Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ableism and Workplace Discrimination Among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities: A Systematic Review

  • Meta Review
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Young people with disabilities are persistently under-employed and experience concerning rates of discrimination and ableism in looking for work and within the workplace. Focusing on youth is salient because rates of ableism are often higher among younger ages compared to older. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the experiences and impact of workplace discrimination and ableism among youth and young adults with disabilities.

Methods

Systematic searches of seven databases from 2000 to 2021 were conducted. Four reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data and rated the study quality.

Results

Of the 39 studies meeting our inclusion criteria, they represented 516,281 participants across eight countries over a 20-year period. The findings highlight the rates of workplace ableism, factors affecting workplace ableism (i.e., type of disability, gender, education level, lack of employers’ knowledge about disability), ableism in job searching and anticipated ableism. The review also noted the impact of workplace ableism, which included pay discrimination, lack of job supports and social exclusion, job turnover and unemployment, and discrimination allegations and charges.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal the stark prevalence of workplace ableism among youth and young adults with disabilities. There is an urgent need for further in-depth research to understand youth’s lived experiences of ableism and the development of solutions to address it so they can be included in a meaningful and respectful way in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindsay S, et al. A systematic review of the benefits of hiring people with disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:634–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamtik M, Guenter M. Policy analysis of equity, diversity and inclusion strategies in Canadian universities: How far have we come? Can J High Educ. 2019;49(3):41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolbring G, Lillywhite A. Equity/equality, diversity, inclusion (EDI) in universities: The case of disabled people. Societies. 2021;11:1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris S, Fawcett G, Brisebois L. A demographic, employment and income profile of Canadians with disabilities aged 15 years and over. Statistics Canada: Ottawa; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown N, Leigh J. Ableism in academia: where are all the disabled and ill academics? Disability & Society, 2018. 33(6): pp. 985–9.

  6. Mellifont D, et al. The ableism elephant in the academy: a study examining academia as informed by Australian scholars with lived experience. Disabil Soc. 2019;3–4:1180–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman H, Lopez-Pulmarejo T, Friedman L, The largest minority group: the disabled. BQuest, 2006: p. 1–14.

  8. Harder J, Keller V, Chopik W. Demographic, experiential, and temporal variation in ableism. J Soc Issues. 2019;75(3):683–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn D. Outsider privileges can lead to insider disadvantages: Some psychosocial aspects of ableism. J Soc Issues. 2019;75(3):665–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw L, et al. Employee and employer characteristics associated with elevated risk of filing disability harassment charges. J Vocat Rehabil. 2012;36:187–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Branco C, Ramos M, Hewstone M. The association of a group-based discrimination with health and well-being: A comparison of ableism with other ‘isms’. J Soc Issues. 2019;75(3):814–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsay S. Discrimination and other barriers to employment for teens and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabilitation. 2011;33(15–16):1340–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsay S, et al. Disclosure and accommodation and workplace accommodations among youth with disabilities. Disabil Rehabilitation. 2019;41(16):1914–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roessler R, et al. Workplace discrimination outcomes and their predictive factors for adults with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Couns Bull. 2007;50(3):139–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw L, Chan F, McMahon B. Intersectionality and disability harassment: The interactive effects of disability, race, age and gender. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin. 2012;55(2):82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shier M, Graham J, Jones M. Barriers to employment as experienced by disabled people: a qualitative analysis in Calgary and Regina, Canada. Disability & Society, 2009. 24(1): pp. 63–75.

  17. Barnes C, Mercer G. Disability, work, and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work Employ Soc. 2005;19(3):527–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nations., U., Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, in GA Res. 2006. p. 106.

  19. Temple J, Kelaher M, Williams R. Discrimination and avoidance due to disability in Australia: evidence from a national cross sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1347–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindsay S, et al. Gender matters in the transition to employment for young adults with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabilitation. 2018;41(3):319–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arnett J. Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Dev Perspect. 2007;1(2):68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindsay S, et al. Career aspirations and workplace expectations among youth with physical disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation; 2020.

  23. Brennan S. Participation and activity limitation survey, 2006: Facts on learning limitations. Statistics Canada: Ottawa; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, et al. The workplace discrimination experiences of middle-age and younger adult workers with disabilities: Results from the national EEOC ADA research project. J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;45:365–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McMahon B, et al. Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA: characteristics of charging parties. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:122–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Canadian Human Rights Commission. Persons with disabilities continue to be marginalized in Canadian society. 2015, Government of Canada: Ottawa. p. https://www.canada.ca/en/human-rights-commission/news/2015/12/persons-with-disabilities-continue-to-be-marginalized-in-canadian-society-chrc.html.

  27. World Health Organization. International Classification and Functioning. 2007.

  28. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

  30. Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Vol. 22: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Edmonton; 2004.

  31. Baldwin M, Marcus S. Perceived and measured stigma among workers with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Serv. 2006;57(3):388–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiu M, Chan K. Community attitudes towards discriminatory practice against people with severe mental illness in Hong Kong. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007;53(2):159–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bjornshagen V. The mark of mental health problems: A field experiment on hiring discrimination before and during COVID-19. Soc Sci Med. 2021;283(114181):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Woodgate R, et al. The wicked problem of stigma for youth living with anxiety. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1491–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ballard L, et al. Experiences of adolescents living with Silver-Russell syndrome. Archives of Disability in Childhood. 2021;106(106):1195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Booth S, Price E, Walker E. Fluctuation, invisibility, fatigue: the barriers to maintaining employment with systemic lupus erythematous–results of an online survey. Lupus. 2018;27:2284–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Borg S, et al. Employment outcomes following spinal cord injury: a population-based cross-sectional study in Australia. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:1120–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chhabra G. Turning a blind eye to employers’ discrimination? Attitudinal barrier perceptions of vision impaired youth from Oslo and Delhi. 36: Disability & Society; 2021. pp. 1688–711.

  39. Crom D, et al. Workplace experiences and turnover intention among adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12:469–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Feuerstein M, et al. Pattern of workplace disputes in cancer survivors: a population study of ADA claims. J Cancer Survivors. 2007;1:185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Goodall J, et al. Stigma and functional disability in relation to marriage and employment in young people with epilepsy in rural Tanzania. Seizure. 2018;54:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hawley C, McMahon B, Roessler R. A comparison of workplace discrimination experiences for youth and adults with epilepsy. J Rehabilitation. 2012;78(2):27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gulik E, et al. Experiences, perspectives and expectations of adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis regarding future work participation; a qualitative study. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18:33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanson H, et al. Experiences of employment among people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative study. 40: Disability & Rehabilitation; 2018. pp. 1921–8.

  45. Shaw K, et al. The prevocational and early employment needs of adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the adolescent perspective. Br J Occup Therapy. 2006;69(3):98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lindsay S, McPherson A, Maxwell J. Perspectives of school-work transitions among youth with spina bifida, their parents and health care providers. Disabil Rehabilitation. 2017;39(7):641–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lindsay S, et al. Applying an ecological framework to understand transition pathways to post-secondary education for youth with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabilitation. 2018;40(3):277–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ripat J, Woodgate R. The importance of assistive technology in the productivity pursuits of young adults with disabilities. Work. 2017;57:455–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. West S, et al., Workplace discrimination and missing limbs: The national EEOC ADA research project. Work, 2005: p. 27–35.

  50. Murray P, et al. Impact of end-stage kidney disease on academic achievement and employment in young adults: A mixed methods study. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:502–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Merrells J, Buchanan A, Waters R. We feel left out: Experiences of social inclusion from the perspective of young adults with intellectual disability. J Intell Dev Disabil. 2019;44(1):13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Plexico L, et al. The influence of workplace discrimination and vigilance on job satisfaction with people who stutter. J Fluen Disord. 2019;62:105725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cramm J, et al., Comparison of barriers to employment among youth with and without disabilities in South Africa. Work, 2013: p. 19–24.

  54. Fabian E, et al., The road to work: Youth with disabilities and their views on employment and the ADA. Rehabilitation Research, Policy and Education, 2021;35(2): 70–83.

  55. Hernandez B, et al. Perspectives of people with disabilities on employment, vocational rehabilitation and Ticket to Work program. J Vocat Rehabil. 2007;27:191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jones A, Finkelstein R, Koehoorn M. Disability and workplace harassment and discrimination among Canadian federal public service employees. Can J Public Health. 2018;109:79–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Magee W. Effects of illness and disability on job separation. Social Science and Medicine, 2004. 58.

  58. McMahon M, et al. Workplace discrimination and learning disabilities in America: Characteristics of charging parties and employers. J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;45:295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Toldra R, Santos M. People with disabilities in the labor market: Facilitators and barriers. Work. 2013;45:553–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gunderson M, Lee B. Pay discrimination against persons with disabilities: Canadian evidence from PALS. Int J Hum Resource Manage. 2016;27(14):1531–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mann D, Wittenburg D. Starting behind: Wage and employment differentials between young adults with and without disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2015;26(2):89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Fabian E. Urban youth with disabilities: Factors affecting transition employment. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin. 2007;50(3):130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lindsay S, et al. An ecological approach to understanding barriers to employment for youth with disabilities compared to their typically developing peers: Views of youth, employers, and job counselors. Disabil Rehabilitation. 2015;37(8):701–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pace J, Shin M, Rasmussen S. Understanding attitudes toward people with Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2010;152A:2185–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Toldrá RC, Santos MC. People with disabilities in the labor market: facilitators and barriers. Work. 2013;45(4):553–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bjelland M, et al. Age and disability employment discrimination: Occupational rehabilitation implications. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:456–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Roessler R, Hawley C, McMahon B. Employment discrimination experiences of youth with epilepsy: A comparative analysis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2012;36:149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tomas V, Ahmed H, Lindsay S, Unravelling the complexities of workplace disability disclosure among persons with non-visible disabilities: A qualitative meta-ethnography. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2021. in press.

  69. Lindsay S, et al. A framework for developing employer’s disability confidence. Equality. Divers Inclusion. 2019;38(1):40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lindsay S, et al. Systematic review of the role of gender in finding and maintaining employment among youth and young adults with disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):232–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lindsay S, et al. An ecological approach to understanding barriers to employment for youth with disabilities compared to their typically developing peers: Views of youth, employers, and job counselors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):701–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Burchardt T. Aiming high: The educational and occupational aspirations of young disabled people. Support for Learning. 2004;19(4):181–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wilton R. Disability disclosure in the workplace. Just Labour. 2006;8:24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Harpur P. Rights of persons with disabilities and Australian anti-discrimination laws: What happened to the legal protections for people using guide or assistance dogs? Univ Tasmania Law Rev. 2010;29(1):49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Schur L, Ameri M, Kruse D. Telework after COVID: A silver lining for workers with disabilities? J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30:521–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Fuentes M, Houtrow A, Gutierrez V. Ableism and quality of life during the coronavirus pandemic. J Hosp Med. 2021;16(5):316–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. McDonald K, Keys C, Balcazar F. Disability, race/ethnicity and gender: themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39:145–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Sally Lindsay, Kristina Fuentes, Vanessa Tomas & Shaelynn Hsu

  2. Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Sally Lindsay

Authors
  1. Sally Lindsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristina Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vanessa Tomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaelynn Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Lindsay.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindsay, S., Fuentes, K., Tomas, V. et al. Ableism and Workplace Discrimination Among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities: A Systematic Review. J Occup Rehabil 33, 20–36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10049-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10049-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation